YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information

Peter L. Steinberg, Shaun Wason, Joshua M. Stern, Levi Deters, Brian Kowal, John Seigne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

114 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Patients can search the Internet for prostate cancer information, and YouTube is a popular Web site that they may consult. We analyzed the prostate cancer videos on YouTube for information content and the presence of bias. Methods: YouTube was searched for videos about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, radiotherapy, and surgery for prostate cancer. The included videos were in English and <10 minutes long. Two physician viewers watched each video and assigned a score for information content (excellent, fair, poor) and bias (for, against, neutral, or balanced). A third viewer arbitrated any discrepancies. The kappa statistic was used to measure interobserver variability, and Pearson's test was used to assess correlation. Results: A total of 14 PSA videos, 5 radiotherapy videos, and 32 surgery videos were analyzed. The PSA testing videos averaged 1480 ± 2196 views and 146 ± 174 s long and had an average viewer rating of 3.1 ± 2.1 (viewer rating scale 0-5). The surgery videos averaged 2044 ± 3740 views and 172 ± 122 s long and had an average viewer rating of scored 3 ± 2.2. The radiotherapy videos averaged 287 ± 255 views and 97 ± 45 s long and had a score of 1.8 ± 2.5. The information content was fair or poor for 73% of all videos. The bias for surgery, radiotherapy, or PSA testing was present in 69% of videos; 0% of videos were biased against treatment or PSA testing. The interobserver variability was well above than expected by chance alone. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that although some videos are robust sources of information, given the preponderance of modest and unbalanced information among reviewed videos, YouTube is an inadequate source of prostate cancer information for patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)619-622
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostatic Neoplasms
Radiotherapy
Observer Variation
Internet
Physicians
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Steinberg, P. L., Wason, S., Stern, J. M., Deters, L., Kowal, B., & Seigne, J. (2010). YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information. Urology, 75(3), 619-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059

YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information. / Steinberg, Peter L.; Wason, Shaun; Stern, Joshua M.; Deters, Levi; Kowal, Brian; Seigne, John.

In: Urology, Vol. 75, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 619-622.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Steinberg, PL, Wason, S, Stern, JM, Deters, L, Kowal, B & Seigne, J 2010, 'YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information', Urology, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 619-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059
Steinberg PL, Wason S, Stern JM, Deters L, Kowal B, Seigne J. YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information. Urology. 2010 Mar;75(3):619-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059
Steinberg, Peter L. ; Wason, Shaun ; Stern, Joshua M. ; Deters, Levi ; Kowal, Brian ; Seigne, John. / YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information. In: Urology. 2010 ; Vol. 75, No. 3. pp. 619-622.
@article{9d5ae10cf01b446096fa20acf91fbb56,
title = "YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information",
abstract = "Objectives: Patients can search the Internet for prostate cancer information, and YouTube is a popular Web site that they may consult. We analyzed the prostate cancer videos on YouTube for information content and the presence of bias. Methods: YouTube was searched for videos about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, radiotherapy, and surgery for prostate cancer. The included videos were in English and <10 minutes long. Two physician viewers watched each video and assigned a score for information content (excellent, fair, poor) and bias (for, against, neutral, or balanced). A third viewer arbitrated any discrepancies. The kappa statistic was used to measure interobserver variability, and Pearson's test was used to assess correlation. Results: A total of 14 PSA videos, 5 radiotherapy videos, and 32 surgery videos were analyzed. The PSA testing videos averaged 1480 ± 2196 views and 146 ± 174 s long and had an average viewer rating of 3.1 ± 2.1 (viewer rating scale 0-5). The surgery videos averaged 2044 ± 3740 views and 172 ± 122 s long and had an average viewer rating of scored 3 ± 2.2. The radiotherapy videos averaged 287 ± 255 views and 97 ± 45 s long and had a score of 1.8 ± 2.5. The information content was fair or poor for 73{\%} of all videos. The bias for surgery, radiotherapy, or PSA testing was present in 69{\%} of videos; 0{\%} of videos were biased against treatment or PSA testing. The interobserver variability was well above than expected by chance alone. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that although some videos are robust sources of information, given the preponderance of modest and unbalanced information among reviewed videos, YouTube is an inadequate source of prostate cancer information for patients.",
author = "Steinberg, {Peter L.} and Shaun Wason and Stern, {Joshua M.} and Levi Deters and Brian Kowal and John Seigne",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "619--622",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - YouTube as Source of Prostate Cancer Information

AU - Steinberg, Peter L.

AU - Wason, Shaun

AU - Stern, Joshua M.

AU - Deters, Levi

AU - Kowal, Brian

AU - Seigne, John

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Objectives: Patients can search the Internet for prostate cancer information, and YouTube is a popular Web site that they may consult. We analyzed the prostate cancer videos on YouTube for information content and the presence of bias. Methods: YouTube was searched for videos about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, radiotherapy, and surgery for prostate cancer. The included videos were in English and <10 minutes long. Two physician viewers watched each video and assigned a score for information content (excellent, fair, poor) and bias (for, against, neutral, or balanced). A third viewer arbitrated any discrepancies. The kappa statistic was used to measure interobserver variability, and Pearson's test was used to assess correlation. Results: A total of 14 PSA videos, 5 radiotherapy videos, and 32 surgery videos were analyzed. The PSA testing videos averaged 1480 ± 2196 views and 146 ± 174 s long and had an average viewer rating of 3.1 ± 2.1 (viewer rating scale 0-5). The surgery videos averaged 2044 ± 3740 views and 172 ± 122 s long and had an average viewer rating of scored 3 ± 2.2. The radiotherapy videos averaged 287 ± 255 views and 97 ± 45 s long and had a score of 1.8 ± 2.5. The information content was fair or poor for 73% of all videos. The bias for surgery, radiotherapy, or PSA testing was present in 69% of videos; 0% of videos were biased against treatment or PSA testing. The interobserver variability was well above than expected by chance alone. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that although some videos are robust sources of information, given the preponderance of modest and unbalanced information among reviewed videos, YouTube is an inadequate source of prostate cancer information for patients.

AB - Objectives: Patients can search the Internet for prostate cancer information, and YouTube is a popular Web site that they may consult. We analyzed the prostate cancer videos on YouTube for information content and the presence of bias. Methods: YouTube was searched for videos about prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, radiotherapy, and surgery for prostate cancer. The included videos were in English and <10 minutes long. Two physician viewers watched each video and assigned a score for information content (excellent, fair, poor) and bias (for, against, neutral, or balanced). A third viewer arbitrated any discrepancies. The kappa statistic was used to measure interobserver variability, and Pearson's test was used to assess correlation. Results: A total of 14 PSA videos, 5 radiotherapy videos, and 32 surgery videos were analyzed. The PSA testing videos averaged 1480 ± 2196 views and 146 ± 174 s long and had an average viewer rating of 3.1 ± 2.1 (viewer rating scale 0-5). The surgery videos averaged 2044 ± 3740 views and 172 ± 122 s long and had an average viewer rating of scored 3 ± 2.2. The radiotherapy videos averaged 287 ± 255 views and 97 ± 45 s long and had a score of 1.8 ± 2.5. The information content was fair or poor for 73% of all videos. The bias for surgery, radiotherapy, or PSA testing was present in 69% of videos; 0% of videos were biased against treatment or PSA testing. The interobserver variability was well above than expected by chance alone. Conclusions: The results of our study have shown that although some videos are robust sources of information, given the preponderance of modest and unbalanced information among reviewed videos, YouTube is an inadequate source of prostate cancer information for patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649185317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649185317&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.059

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 619

EP - 622

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 3

ER -