Who Should Be at the Bedside 24/7

Doctors, Families, Nurses?

Hayley B. Gershengorn, Allan Garland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Critical illness does not keep to regular, daytime business hours; we must provide high-quality care and support for intensive care unit (ICU) patients 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Whether this mandates the presence of similar numbers and types of personnel throughout all hours of the day, however, has been the subject of much debate and substantial research. In this article, we review the available literature on the consequences of having three groups of care providers at a patient's bedside overnight: physicians, visitors, and nurses. Though few of the studies on this topic are randomized and prospective, several themes have emerged from the existing data. First, there is dramatic variation in practice between and within countries. Second, the weight of evidence does not indicate that patient outcomes are improved by having an intensivist present overnight in ICUs that are staffed by intensivists during the daytime hours. Third, although visitation is highly restricted in many ICUs-out of concerns for disruption of care and a negative physiological or psychological impact on patients-the available data suggest that patients and their families generally benefit from open visitation policies. And finally, although there is little debate that nurses are (and should be) available in the ICU 24/7, existing data do not provide much of a consensus about the details. Uncertainties include whether outcomes are better when each nurse is assigned only one patient (or, more generally, the optimal patient:nurse ratio), who these nurses should be (e.g., registered nurses vs. other personnel), and what their roles should entail (e.g., managing ventilators). As such, we cannot yet identify the optimal overnight nurse staffing strategy. What is clear is that the critical care community needs more and better data to further define these aspects of the relationship between ICU structure and ICU outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-118
Number of pages12
JournalSeminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Nurses
Intensive Care Units
Quality of Health Care
Mechanical Ventilators
Critical Care
Critical Illness
Uncertainty
Consensus
Psychology
Physicians
Weights and Measures
Research

Keywords

  • critical care
  • ICU telemedicine
  • intensive care unit
  • intensivists
  • optimal staffing
  • outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Who Should Be at the Bedside 24/7 : Doctors, Families, Nurses? / Gershengorn, Hayley B.; Garland, Allan.

In: Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 107-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gershengorn, Hayley B. ; Garland, Allan. / Who Should Be at the Bedside 24/7 : Doctors, Families, Nurses?. In: Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 107-118.
@article{99a6c496201a4fbb94cc009234de8a6f,
title = "Who Should Be at the Bedside 24/7: Doctors, Families, Nurses?",
abstract = "Critical illness does not keep to regular, daytime business hours; we must provide high-quality care and support for intensive care unit (ICU) patients 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Whether this mandates the presence of similar numbers and types of personnel throughout all hours of the day, however, has been the subject of much debate and substantial research. In this article, we review the available literature on the consequences of having three groups of care providers at a patient's bedside overnight: physicians, visitors, and nurses. Though few of the studies on this topic are randomized and prospective, several themes have emerged from the existing data. First, there is dramatic variation in practice between and within countries. Second, the weight of evidence does not indicate that patient outcomes are improved by having an intensivist present overnight in ICUs that are staffed by intensivists during the daytime hours. Third, although visitation is highly restricted in many ICUs-out of concerns for disruption of care and a negative physiological or psychological impact on patients-the available data suggest that patients and their families generally benefit from open visitation policies. And finally, although there is little debate that nurses are (and should be) available in the ICU 24/7, existing data do not provide much of a consensus about the details. Uncertainties include whether outcomes are better when each nurse is assigned only one patient (or, more generally, the optimal patient:nurse ratio), who these nurses should be (e.g., registered nurses vs. other personnel), and what their roles should entail (e.g., managing ventilators). As such, we cannot yet identify the optimal overnight nurse staffing strategy. What is clear is that the critical care community needs more and better data to further define these aspects of the relationship between ICU structure and ICU outcomes.",
keywords = "critical care, ICU telemedicine, intensive care unit, intensivists, optimal staffing, outcomes",
author = "Gershengorn, {Hayley B.} and Allan Garland",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1570350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "107--118",
journal = "Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1069-3424",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Should Be at the Bedside 24/7

T2 - Doctors, Families, Nurses?

AU - Gershengorn, Hayley B.

AU - Garland, Allan

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Critical illness does not keep to regular, daytime business hours; we must provide high-quality care and support for intensive care unit (ICU) patients 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Whether this mandates the presence of similar numbers and types of personnel throughout all hours of the day, however, has been the subject of much debate and substantial research. In this article, we review the available literature on the consequences of having three groups of care providers at a patient's bedside overnight: physicians, visitors, and nurses. Though few of the studies on this topic are randomized and prospective, several themes have emerged from the existing data. First, there is dramatic variation in practice between and within countries. Second, the weight of evidence does not indicate that patient outcomes are improved by having an intensivist present overnight in ICUs that are staffed by intensivists during the daytime hours. Third, although visitation is highly restricted in many ICUs-out of concerns for disruption of care and a negative physiological or psychological impact on patients-the available data suggest that patients and their families generally benefit from open visitation policies. And finally, although there is little debate that nurses are (and should be) available in the ICU 24/7, existing data do not provide much of a consensus about the details. Uncertainties include whether outcomes are better when each nurse is assigned only one patient (or, more generally, the optimal patient:nurse ratio), who these nurses should be (e.g., registered nurses vs. other personnel), and what their roles should entail (e.g., managing ventilators). As such, we cannot yet identify the optimal overnight nurse staffing strategy. What is clear is that the critical care community needs more and better data to further define these aspects of the relationship between ICU structure and ICU outcomes.

AB - Critical illness does not keep to regular, daytime business hours; we must provide high-quality care and support for intensive care unit (ICU) patients 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Whether this mandates the presence of similar numbers and types of personnel throughout all hours of the day, however, has been the subject of much debate and substantial research. In this article, we review the available literature on the consequences of having three groups of care providers at a patient's bedside overnight: physicians, visitors, and nurses. Though few of the studies on this topic are randomized and prospective, several themes have emerged from the existing data. First, there is dramatic variation in practice between and within countries. Second, the weight of evidence does not indicate that patient outcomes are improved by having an intensivist present overnight in ICUs that are staffed by intensivists during the daytime hours. Third, although visitation is highly restricted in many ICUs-out of concerns for disruption of care and a negative physiological or psychological impact on patients-the available data suggest that patients and their families generally benefit from open visitation policies. And finally, although there is little debate that nurses are (and should be) available in the ICU 24/7, existing data do not provide much of a consensus about the details. Uncertainties include whether outcomes are better when each nurse is assigned only one patient (or, more generally, the optimal patient:nurse ratio), who these nurses should be (e.g., registered nurses vs. other personnel), and what their roles should entail (e.g., managing ventilators). As such, we cannot yet identify the optimal overnight nurse staffing strategy. What is clear is that the critical care community needs more and better data to further define these aspects of the relationship between ICU structure and ICU outcomes.

KW - critical care

KW - ICU telemedicine

KW - intensive care unit

KW - intensivists

KW - optimal staffing

KW - outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956483475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956483475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1570350

DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1570350

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 107

EP - 118

JO - Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1069-3424

IS - 1

ER -