Who Can Stay at Home? Assessing the Capacity to Choose to Live in the Community

Leo M. Cooney, Gary J. Kennedy, Keith A. Hawkins, Sally Balch Hurme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While the courts have final responsibility, physicians are often asked to evaluate the ability of an older individual to remain living alone in the community. A person's capacity to make this decision can be more difficult to assess than the capacity to make medical decisions. Unsafe actions alone do not restrict the choice of individuals. Inability to understand the implications of these actions may also limit this choice. Decision-making ability is not well measured by global tests of cognitive function. Deficits in executive function resulting in impaired insight, problem-solving ability, and goal-directed planning limit one's ability to make and carry out decisions. Unsafe actions and deficits in executive function, combined with the refusal to accept help from family and social agencies, may indicate that independent living in the community presents unacceptable risks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-360
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Internal Medicine
Volume164
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 23 2004

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Executive Function
Independent Living
Cognition
Decision Making
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Who Can Stay at Home? Assessing the Capacity to Choose to Live in the Community. / Cooney, Leo M.; Kennedy, Gary J.; Hawkins, Keith A.; Hurme, Sally Balch.

In: Archives of Internal Medicine, Vol. 164, No. 4, 23.02.2004, p. 357-360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cooney, Leo M. ; Kennedy, Gary J. ; Hawkins, Keith A. ; Hurme, Sally Balch. / Who Can Stay at Home? Assessing the Capacity to Choose to Live in the Community. In: Archives of Internal Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 164, No. 4. pp. 357-360.
@article{28b8af24d76b40ab92c9ea6fa8cd4a59,
title = "Who Can Stay at Home? Assessing the Capacity to Choose to Live in the Community",
abstract = "While the courts have final responsibility, physicians are often asked to evaluate the ability of an older individual to remain living alone in the community. A person's capacity to make this decision can be more difficult to assess than the capacity to make medical decisions. Unsafe actions alone do not restrict the choice of individuals. Inability to understand the implications of these actions may also limit this choice. Decision-making ability is not well measured by global tests of cognitive function. Deficits in executive function resulting in impaired insight, problem-solving ability, and goal-directed planning limit one's ability to make and carry out decisions. Unsafe actions and deficits in executive function, combined with the refusal to accept help from family and social agencies, may indicate that independent living in the community presents unacceptable risks.",
author = "Cooney, {Leo M.} and Kennedy, {Gary J.} and Hawkins, {Keith A.} and Hurme, {Sally Balch}",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1001/archinte.164.4.357",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "164",
pages = "357--360",
journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",
issn = "2168-6106",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who Can Stay at Home? Assessing the Capacity to Choose to Live in the Community

AU - Cooney, Leo M.

AU - Kennedy, Gary J.

AU - Hawkins, Keith A.

AU - Hurme, Sally Balch

PY - 2004/2/23

Y1 - 2004/2/23

N2 - While the courts have final responsibility, physicians are often asked to evaluate the ability of an older individual to remain living alone in the community. A person's capacity to make this decision can be more difficult to assess than the capacity to make medical decisions. Unsafe actions alone do not restrict the choice of individuals. Inability to understand the implications of these actions may also limit this choice. Decision-making ability is not well measured by global tests of cognitive function. Deficits in executive function resulting in impaired insight, problem-solving ability, and goal-directed planning limit one's ability to make and carry out decisions. Unsafe actions and deficits in executive function, combined with the refusal to accept help from family and social agencies, may indicate that independent living in the community presents unacceptable risks.

AB - While the courts have final responsibility, physicians are often asked to evaluate the ability of an older individual to remain living alone in the community. A person's capacity to make this decision can be more difficult to assess than the capacity to make medical decisions. Unsafe actions alone do not restrict the choice of individuals. Inability to understand the implications of these actions may also limit this choice. Decision-making ability is not well measured by global tests of cognitive function. Deficits in executive function resulting in impaired insight, problem-solving ability, and goal-directed planning limit one's ability to make and carry out decisions. Unsafe actions and deficits in executive function, combined with the refusal to accept help from family and social agencies, may indicate that independent living in the community presents unacceptable risks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1242275229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1242275229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinte.164.4.357

DO - 10.1001/archinte.164.4.357

M3 - Article

VL - 164

SP - 357

EP - 360

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 4

ER -