What is a social medicine doctor?

Arati Karnik, Asiya Tschannerl, Matthew R. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In 1970 Montefiore Medical Center created the Residency Program in Social Medicine (RPSM) to train physicians to provide care for the underserved. We investigated the characteristics identified by RPSM residents, faculty, and alumni to be those of a “social medicine doctor.” Methods: Current residents, faculty, and alumni of the RPSM were eligible to participate in the survey, which was sent via email. The survey had seven items: status (resident, faculty, or alumni); specialty (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics); the role of social medicine in their clinical practice, how social medicine doctors differed from other primary care physicians (PCP), and questions regarding the RPSM curriculum. Demographic data was tabulated, and comments were grouped into themes and investigated via textual and qualitative analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 173 respondents (29% of 590 potential participants). Forty-seven percent were in Family Medicine, 30% in Internal Medicine, and 24% in Pediatrics. Fiftyfour percent were alumni, 28% were faculty, and 22% were current residents. There were three main themes: social medicine doctors have a broad knowledge of the social determinants of health, they have the ability to translate this broad knowledge of health into a specific treatment plan, and they promote social justice in their work. Sub-themes provided a richer description of social medicine concepts and how social medicine practice contrasted with the practice of other primary care physicians. Conclusions: Within the model adopted by the RPSM social conditions are seen as integral to clinical care. This model was viewed as fundamentally different from the practice of other primary care physicians.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-62
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Medicine
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

social medicine
Social Medicine
Internship and Residency
alumni
Primary Care Physicians
physician
medicine
resident
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Social Determinants of Health
Pediatrics
Aptitude
Social Conditions
Social Justice
health
Curriculum
social justice
social factors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Karnik, A., Tschannerl, A., & Anderson, M. R. (2015). What is a social medicine doctor? Social Medicine, 9(2), 56-62.

What is a social medicine doctor? / Karnik, Arati; Tschannerl, Asiya; Anderson, Matthew R.

In: Social Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.10.2015, p. 56-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karnik, A, Tschannerl, A & Anderson, MR 2015, 'What is a social medicine doctor?', Social Medicine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 56-62.
Karnik A, Tschannerl A, Anderson MR. What is a social medicine doctor? Social Medicine. 2015 Oct 1;9(2):56-62.
Karnik, Arati ; Tschannerl, Asiya ; Anderson, Matthew R. / What is a social medicine doctor?. In: Social Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 56-62.
@article{fb46ae954be34dba8ae264be8c3c1965,
title = "What is a social medicine doctor?",
abstract = "Background: In 1970 Montefiore Medical Center created the Residency Program in Social Medicine (RPSM) to train physicians to provide care for the underserved. We investigated the characteristics identified by RPSM residents, faculty, and alumni to be those of a “social medicine doctor.” Methods: Current residents, faculty, and alumni of the RPSM were eligible to participate in the survey, which was sent via email. The survey had seven items: status (resident, faculty, or alumni); specialty (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics); the role of social medicine in their clinical practice, how social medicine doctors differed from other primary care physicians (PCP), and questions regarding the RPSM curriculum. Demographic data was tabulated, and comments were grouped into themes and investigated via textual and qualitative analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 173 respondents (29{\%} of 590 potential participants). Forty-seven percent were in Family Medicine, 30{\%} in Internal Medicine, and 24{\%} in Pediatrics. Fiftyfour percent were alumni, 28{\%} were faculty, and 22{\%} were current residents. There were three main themes: social medicine doctors have a broad knowledge of the social determinants of health, they have the ability to translate this broad knowledge of health into a specific treatment plan, and they promote social justice in their work. Sub-themes provided a richer description of social medicine concepts and how social medicine practice contrasted with the practice of other primary care physicians. Conclusions: Within the model adopted by the RPSM social conditions are seen as integral to clinical care. This model was viewed as fundamentally different from the practice of other primary care physicians.",
author = "Arati Karnik and Asiya Tschannerl and Anderson, {Matthew R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "56--62",
journal = "Social Medicine",
issn = "1557-7112",
publisher = "Social Medicine Publication Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is a social medicine doctor?

AU - Karnik, Arati

AU - Tschannerl, Asiya

AU - Anderson, Matthew R.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Background: In 1970 Montefiore Medical Center created the Residency Program in Social Medicine (RPSM) to train physicians to provide care for the underserved. We investigated the characteristics identified by RPSM residents, faculty, and alumni to be those of a “social medicine doctor.” Methods: Current residents, faculty, and alumni of the RPSM were eligible to participate in the survey, which was sent via email. The survey had seven items: status (resident, faculty, or alumni); specialty (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics); the role of social medicine in their clinical practice, how social medicine doctors differed from other primary care physicians (PCP), and questions regarding the RPSM curriculum. Demographic data was tabulated, and comments were grouped into themes and investigated via textual and qualitative analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 173 respondents (29% of 590 potential participants). Forty-seven percent were in Family Medicine, 30% in Internal Medicine, and 24% in Pediatrics. Fiftyfour percent were alumni, 28% were faculty, and 22% were current residents. There were three main themes: social medicine doctors have a broad knowledge of the social determinants of health, they have the ability to translate this broad knowledge of health into a specific treatment plan, and they promote social justice in their work. Sub-themes provided a richer description of social medicine concepts and how social medicine practice contrasted with the practice of other primary care physicians. Conclusions: Within the model adopted by the RPSM social conditions are seen as integral to clinical care. This model was viewed as fundamentally different from the practice of other primary care physicians.

AB - Background: In 1970 Montefiore Medical Center created the Residency Program in Social Medicine (RPSM) to train physicians to provide care for the underserved. We investigated the characteristics identified by RPSM residents, faculty, and alumni to be those of a “social medicine doctor.” Methods: Current residents, faculty, and alumni of the RPSM were eligible to participate in the survey, which was sent via email. The survey had seven items: status (resident, faculty, or alumni); specialty (Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatrics); the role of social medicine in their clinical practice, how social medicine doctors differed from other primary care physicians (PCP), and questions regarding the RPSM curriculum. Demographic data was tabulated, and comments were grouped into themes and investigated via textual and qualitative analysis. Results: The survey was completed by 173 respondents (29% of 590 potential participants). Forty-seven percent were in Family Medicine, 30% in Internal Medicine, and 24% in Pediatrics. Fiftyfour percent were alumni, 28% were faculty, and 22% were current residents. There were three main themes: social medicine doctors have a broad knowledge of the social determinants of health, they have the ability to translate this broad knowledge of health into a specific treatment plan, and they promote social justice in their work. Sub-themes provided a richer description of social medicine concepts and how social medicine practice contrasted with the practice of other primary care physicians. Conclusions: Within the model adopted by the RPSM social conditions are seen as integral to clinical care. This model was viewed as fundamentally different from the practice of other primary care physicians.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953265402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953265402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 56

EP - 62

JO - Social Medicine

JF - Social Medicine

SN - 1557-7112

IS - 2

ER -