Urban female patients' perceptions of the family medicine clinic as a site for abortion care

Susan E. Rubin, Emily M. Godfrey, Miriam Shapiro, Marji Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Induced abortion is common in the US, yet there is a lack of providers. We surveyed female patients asking why they would or would not (a) accept early abortion offered by their family physician (FP) in their family medicine clinic (FMC) and (b) prefer to access abortion services in the FMC. Study Design: An anonymous survey with open- and closed-ended questions was conducted at three FMCs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Four hundred forty-nine women completed the survey. Respondents supported offering medication (68.8%) and suction (43.1%) abortion in the FMC. Sixty-seven percent of the respondents who identified themselves as possibly having a future abortion (n=231) would prefer to have the abortion in their FMC. Comfort with either their provider or the FMC was the most frequently cited reason for preferring the FMC. Concern about preserving comfort at the FMC was mentioned by others as a reason for not choosing the FMC. "Expertise" was the most commonly cited reason by those who preferred a specialized abortion clinic. Anonymity or privacy was mentioned by different respondents as a benefit of care at both sites. Conclusion: In order to address patient preferences and concerns, early abortion services should be offered in the FMC as well as in specialty clinics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)174-179
Number of pages6
JournalContraception
Volume80
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Medicine
Induced Abortion
Patient Preference
Privacy
Family Physicians
Suction
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Abortion, induced
  • Abortion, medical
  • Abortion, surgical
  • Patient acceptance of health care
  • Patient-centered care
  • Reproductive health services

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Urban female patients' perceptions of the family medicine clinic as a site for abortion care. / Rubin, Susan E.; Godfrey, Emily M.; Shapiro, Miriam; Gold, Marji.

In: Contraception, Vol. 80, No. 2, 08.2009, p. 174-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rubin, Susan E. ; Godfrey, Emily M. ; Shapiro, Miriam ; Gold, Marji. / Urban female patients' perceptions of the family medicine clinic as a site for abortion care. In: Contraception. 2009 ; Vol. 80, No. 2. pp. 174-179.
@article{3f65845e5cf54e20be53a23892a4bfdd,
title = "Urban female patients' perceptions of the family medicine clinic as a site for abortion care",
abstract = "Background: Induced abortion is common in the US, yet there is a lack of providers. We surveyed female patients asking why they would or would not (a) accept early abortion offered by their family physician (FP) in their family medicine clinic (FMC) and (b) prefer to access abortion services in the FMC. Study Design: An anonymous survey with open- and closed-ended questions was conducted at three FMCs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Four hundred forty-nine women completed the survey. Respondents supported offering medication (68.8{\%}) and suction (43.1{\%}) abortion in the FMC. Sixty-seven percent of the respondents who identified themselves as possibly having a future abortion (n=231) would prefer to have the abortion in their FMC. Comfort with either their provider or the FMC was the most frequently cited reason for preferring the FMC. Concern about preserving comfort at the FMC was mentioned by others as a reason for not choosing the FMC. {"}Expertise{"} was the most commonly cited reason by those who preferred a specialized abortion clinic. Anonymity or privacy was mentioned by different respondents as a benefit of care at both sites. Conclusion: In order to address patient preferences and concerns, early abortion services should be offered in the FMC as well as in specialty clinics.",
keywords = "Abortion, induced, Abortion, medical, Abortion, surgical, Patient acceptance of health care, Patient-centered care, Reproductive health services",
author = "Rubin, {Susan E.} and Godfrey, {Emily M.} and Miriam Shapiro and Marji Gold",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2009.01.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "174--179",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urban female patients' perceptions of the family medicine clinic as a site for abortion care

AU - Rubin, Susan E.

AU - Godfrey, Emily M.

AU - Shapiro, Miriam

AU - Gold, Marji

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Background: Induced abortion is common in the US, yet there is a lack of providers. We surveyed female patients asking why they would or would not (a) accept early abortion offered by their family physician (FP) in their family medicine clinic (FMC) and (b) prefer to access abortion services in the FMC. Study Design: An anonymous survey with open- and closed-ended questions was conducted at three FMCs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Four hundred forty-nine women completed the survey. Respondents supported offering medication (68.8%) and suction (43.1%) abortion in the FMC. Sixty-seven percent of the respondents who identified themselves as possibly having a future abortion (n=231) would prefer to have the abortion in their FMC. Comfort with either their provider or the FMC was the most frequently cited reason for preferring the FMC. Concern about preserving comfort at the FMC was mentioned by others as a reason for not choosing the FMC. "Expertise" was the most commonly cited reason by those who preferred a specialized abortion clinic. Anonymity or privacy was mentioned by different respondents as a benefit of care at both sites. Conclusion: In order to address patient preferences and concerns, early abortion services should be offered in the FMC as well as in specialty clinics.

AB - Background: Induced abortion is common in the US, yet there is a lack of providers. We surveyed female patients asking why they would or would not (a) accept early abortion offered by their family physician (FP) in their family medicine clinic (FMC) and (b) prefer to access abortion services in the FMC. Study Design: An anonymous survey with open- and closed-ended questions was conducted at three FMCs. Results were analyzed using qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: Four hundred forty-nine women completed the survey. Respondents supported offering medication (68.8%) and suction (43.1%) abortion in the FMC. Sixty-seven percent of the respondents who identified themselves as possibly having a future abortion (n=231) would prefer to have the abortion in their FMC. Comfort with either their provider or the FMC was the most frequently cited reason for preferring the FMC. Concern about preserving comfort at the FMC was mentioned by others as a reason for not choosing the FMC. "Expertise" was the most commonly cited reason by those who preferred a specialized abortion clinic. Anonymity or privacy was mentioned by different respondents as a benefit of care at both sites. Conclusion: In order to address patient preferences and concerns, early abortion services should be offered in the FMC as well as in specialty clinics.

KW - Abortion, induced

KW - Abortion, medical

KW - Abortion, surgical

KW - Patient acceptance of health care

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Reproductive health services

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650885481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650885481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.01.017

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.01.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 19631794

AN - SCOPUS:67650885481

VL - 80

SP - 174

EP - 179

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 2

ER -