Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: A mixed methods investigation

Carolyn E. Schwartz, Bruce D. Rapkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Mixed methods investigated the cognitive processes reflected in retrospective pretest (thentest) discrepancy scores [i.e., recalibration response shift (RS)]. Methods: People with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune disease syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (n = 521) were interviewed at baseline and 6 months using the Quality of Life (QOL) Appraisal Profile, the Rand-36, General Health thentest, and recall items. Open-ended appraisal questions were coded, and factor analyses reduced the data. Ipsative (based on the then-minus-pretest) and normative (based on regression residuals) discrepancy scores were compared. Hypothesis testing related to recall bias and relationships among appraisal parameters and ipsative discrepancies, after covariate adjustment. Results: Coded frame of reference themes were distinct from experience sampling, standards of comparison, and combinatory algorithm. There was convergence between the ipsative and normative discrepancy scores (r = 0.30), but the former were associated with more appraisal changes and goal-related appraisals than the latter. Thentest effect sizes (ES) were larger than standard change scores, even controlling for recall bias. Multivariate models including appraisal parameters explained 9% more variance over the standard (unadjusted for RS) model. Conclusions: Ipsative and normative discrepancy scores measure distinct constructs, represent different configurations of appraisal change, and are not invalidated or explained by recall bias. The thentest does not imply recalibration alone but rather a host of health- and selfcare-related concerns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-388
Number of pages8
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Immune System Diseases
Health
Statistical Factor Analysis
Quality of Life
HIV
Ecological Momentary Assessment

Keywords

  • Appraisal
  • HIV/AIDS
  • Ipsative
  • Longitudinal
  • Normative
  • Qualitative
  • Quantitative
  • Response shift

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest : A mixed methods investigation. / Schwartz, Carolyn E.; Rapkin, Bruce D.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, 04.2012, p. 381-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b86fc89a85c42c497cd26846a1926e7,
title = "Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest: A mixed methods investigation",
abstract = "Aims: Mixed methods investigated the cognitive processes reflected in retrospective pretest (thentest) discrepancy scores [i.e., recalibration response shift (RS)]. Methods: People with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune disease syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (n = 521) were interviewed at baseline and 6 months using the Quality of Life (QOL) Appraisal Profile, the Rand-36, General Health thentest, and recall items. Open-ended appraisal questions were coded, and factor analyses reduced the data. Ipsative (based on the then-minus-pretest) and normative (based on regression residuals) discrepancy scores were compared. Hypothesis testing related to recall bias and relationships among appraisal parameters and ipsative discrepancies, after covariate adjustment. Results: Coded frame of reference themes were distinct from experience sampling, standards of comparison, and combinatory algorithm. There was convergence between the ipsative and normative discrepancy scores (r = 0.30), but the former were associated with more appraisal changes and goal-related appraisals than the latter. Thentest effect sizes (ES) were larger than standard change scores, even controlling for recall bias. Multivariate models including appraisal parameters explained 9{\%} more variance over the standard (unadjusted for RS) model. Conclusions: Ipsative and normative discrepancy scores measure distinct constructs, represent different configurations of appraisal change, and are not invalidated or explained by recall bias. The thentest does not imply recalibration alone but rather a host of health- and selfcare-related concerns.",
keywords = "Appraisal, HIV/AIDS, Ipsative, Longitudinal, Normative, Qualitative, Quantitative, Response shift",
author = "Schwartz, {Carolyn E.} and Rapkin, {Bruce D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-011-0023-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "381--388",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding appraisal processes underlying the thentest

T2 - A mixed methods investigation

AU - Schwartz, Carolyn E.

AU - Rapkin, Bruce D.

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - Aims: Mixed methods investigated the cognitive processes reflected in retrospective pretest (thentest) discrepancy scores [i.e., recalibration response shift (RS)]. Methods: People with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune disease syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (n = 521) were interviewed at baseline and 6 months using the Quality of Life (QOL) Appraisal Profile, the Rand-36, General Health thentest, and recall items. Open-ended appraisal questions were coded, and factor analyses reduced the data. Ipsative (based on the then-minus-pretest) and normative (based on regression residuals) discrepancy scores were compared. Hypothesis testing related to recall bias and relationships among appraisal parameters and ipsative discrepancies, after covariate adjustment. Results: Coded frame of reference themes were distinct from experience sampling, standards of comparison, and combinatory algorithm. There was convergence between the ipsative and normative discrepancy scores (r = 0.30), but the former were associated with more appraisal changes and goal-related appraisals than the latter. Thentest effect sizes (ES) were larger than standard change scores, even controlling for recall bias. Multivariate models including appraisal parameters explained 9% more variance over the standard (unadjusted for RS) model. Conclusions: Ipsative and normative discrepancy scores measure distinct constructs, represent different configurations of appraisal change, and are not invalidated or explained by recall bias. The thentest does not imply recalibration alone but rather a host of health- and selfcare-related concerns.

AB - Aims: Mixed methods investigated the cognitive processes reflected in retrospective pretest (thentest) discrepancy scores [i.e., recalibration response shift (RS)]. Methods: People with human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune disease syndrome (HIV/AIDS) (n = 521) were interviewed at baseline and 6 months using the Quality of Life (QOL) Appraisal Profile, the Rand-36, General Health thentest, and recall items. Open-ended appraisal questions were coded, and factor analyses reduced the data. Ipsative (based on the then-minus-pretest) and normative (based on regression residuals) discrepancy scores were compared. Hypothesis testing related to recall bias and relationships among appraisal parameters and ipsative discrepancies, after covariate adjustment. Results: Coded frame of reference themes were distinct from experience sampling, standards of comparison, and combinatory algorithm. There was convergence between the ipsative and normative discrepancy scores (r = 0.30), but the former were associated with more appraisal changes and goal-related appraisals than the latter. Thentest effect sizes (ES) were larger than standard change scores, even controlling for recall bias. Multivariate models including appraisal parameters explained 9% more variance over the standard (unadjusted for RS) model. Conclusions: Ipsative and normative discrepancy scores measure distinct constructs, represent different configurations of appraisal change, and are not invalidated or explained by recall bias. The thentest does not imply recalibration alone but rather a host of health- and selfcare-related concerns.

KW - Appraisal

KW - HIV/AIDS

KW - Ipsative

KW - Longitudinal

KW - Normative

KW - Qualitative

KW - Quantitative

KW - Response shift

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863633509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863633509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-011-0023-4

DO - 10.1007/s11136-011-0023-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 21969088

AN - SCOPUS:84863633509

VL - 21

SP - 381

EP - 388

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 3

ER -