Unconventional approaches to cardiac pacing in patients with inaccessible cardiac chambers

Daniel J. Goldstein, David Rabkin, Henry M. Spotnitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Transvenous endocardial implantation can be impossible or contraindicated in patients with inaccessible fight cardiac chambers. These patients usually undergo epicardial implantation, which has been associated with frequent rising thresholds and limited lead survival. We have used the following two alternative approaches in these patients: (1) transatrial puncture and passage of pacing leads for patients with no access to the right atrium and (2) ventricular pacing from the coronary sinus or its tributaries for patients with inaccessible ventricles. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in 9 patients who had those procedures. Five patients had pacing from the coronary sinus, and 4 by transatrial puncture. Results. Seven of the 9 patients had DDD pacing. Low acute pacing thresholds and satisfactory sensing levels were obtained with both approaches. One instance of high stimulation threshold (20%) occurred in the coronary sinus group and none in the transatrial puncture group. One patient in the transatrial puncture group died from unrelated causes. No malignant arrhythmias, pneumothorax, diaphragmatic pacing, or infectious complications have been observed. Conclusion. These unconventional approaches are safe, relatively simple, and reliable. Although the short-term follow-up is favorable, long- term follow-up is necessary to ascertain the relative merit of these approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)952-958
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Thoracic Surgery
Volume67
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Punctures
Coronary Sinus
Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane
Pneumothorax
Heart Atria
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Unconventional approaches to cardiac pacing in patients with inaccessible cardiac chambers. / Goldstein, Daniel J.; Rabkin, David; Spotnitz, Henry M.

In: Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Vol. 67, No. 4, 04.1999, p. 952-958.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92afd2f11e674cfcaafbdce6701726da,
title = "Unconventional approaches to cardiac pacing in patients with inaccessible cardiac chambers",
abstract = "Background. Transvenous endocardial implantation can be impossible or contraindicated in patients with inaccessible fight cardiac chambers. These patients usually undergo epicardial implantation, which has been associated with frequent rising thresholds and limited lead survival. We have used the following two alternative approaches in these patients: (1) transatrial puncture and passage of pacing leads for patients with no access to the right atrium and (2) ventricular pacing from the coronary sinus or its tributaries for patients with inaccessible ventricles. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in 9 patients who had those procedures. Five patients had pacing from the coronary sinus, and 4 by transatrial puncture. Results. Seven of the 9 patients had DDD pacing. Low acute pacing thresholds and satisfactory sensing levels were obtained with both approaches. One instance of high stimulation threshold (20{\%}) occurred in the coronary sinus group and none in the transatrial puncture group. One patient in the transatrial puncture group died from unrelated causes. No malignant arrhythmias, pneumothorax, diaphragmatic pacing, or infectious complications have been observed. Conclusion. These unconventional approaches are safe, relatively simple, and reliable. Although the short-term follow-up is favorable, long- term follow-up is necessary to ascertain the relative merit of these approaches.",
author = "Goldstein, {Daniel J.} and David Rabkin and Spotnitz, {Henry M.}",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00150-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "952--958",
journal = "Annals of Thoracic Surgery",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unconventional approaches to cardiac pacing in patients with inaccessible cardiac chambers

AU - Goldstein, Daniel J.

AU - Rabkin, David

AU - Spotnitz, Henry M.

PY - 1999/4

Y1 - 1999/4

N2 - Background. Transvenous endocardial implantation can be impossible or contraindicated in patients with inaccessible fight cardiac chambers. These patients usually undergo epicardial implantation, which has been associated with frequent rising thresholds and limited lead survival. We have used the following two alternative approaches in these patients: (1) transatrial puncture and passage of pacing leads for patients with no access to the right atrium and (2) ventricular pacing from the coronary sinus or its tributaries for patients with inaccessible ventricles. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in 9 patients who had those procedures. Five patients had pacing from the coronary sinus, and 4 by transatrial puncture. Results. Seven of the 9 patients had DDD pacing. Low acute pacing thresholds and satisfactory sensing levels were obtained with both approaches. One instance of high stimulation threshold (20%) occurred in the coronary sinus group and none in the transatrial puncture group. One patient in the transatrial puncture group died from unrelated causes. No malignant arrhythmias, pneumothorax, diaphragmatic pacing, or infectious complications have been observed. Conclusion. These unconventional approaches are safe, relatively simple, and reliable. Although the short-term follow-up is favorable, long- term follow-up is necessary to ascertain the relative merit of these approaches.

AB - Background. Transvenous endocardial implantation can be impossible or contraindicated in patients with inaccessible fight cardiac chambers. These patients usually undergo epicardial implantation, which has been associated with frequent rising thresholds and limited lead survival. We have used the following two alternative approaches in these patients: (1) transatrial puncture and passage of pacing leads for patients with no access to the right atrium and (2) ventricular pacing from the coronary sinus or its tributaries for patients with inaccessible ventricles. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in 9 patients who had those procedures. Five patients had pacing from the coronary sinus, and 4 by transatrial puncture. Results. Seven of the 9 patients had DDD pacing. Low acute pacing thresholds and satisfactory sensing levels were obtained with both approaches. One instance of high stimulation threshold (20%) occurred in the coronary sinus group and none in the transatrial puncture group. One patient in the transatrial puncture group died from unrelated causes. No malignant arrhythmias, pneumothorax, diaphragmatic pacing, or infectious complications have been observed. Conclusion. These unconventional approaches are safe, relatively simple, and reliable. Although the short-term follow-up is favorable, long- term follow-up is necessary to ascertain the relative merit of these approaches.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032957988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032957988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00150-2

DO - 10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00150-2

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 952

EP - 958

JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 4

ER -