Timing of onset and rate of decline in learning and retention in the pre-dementia phase of Alzheimer's disease

Ellen Grober, Yang An, Richard B. Lipton, Claudia Kawas, Susan M. Resnick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To examine trajectories of declines in learning and retention during the predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (pFCSRT+IR). Method: Learning was defined by the sum of free recall over three test trials. Retention was defined in two ways: by delayed free recall (DFR) and by savings; DFR adjusted for learning. The performances of 217 incident AD cases from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) were aligned based on the time that AD was first diagnosed. The predementia phase of learning and retention decline was assessed using change point models in which cognitive trajectories are described by a series of linear components with knots delineating times of accelerating decline. Results: Trajectories for both learning and DFR had two change points: the first at 6.58 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.56, 6.60) to 7.29 (95% CI: 6.13, 8.46) years before diagnosis followed by gradual decline over the next 4 years, and a second acceleration of decline 1.89 (0.56, 3.24) to 2.93 (95% CI: 1.56, 4.30) years before diagnosis. The change points for DFR were not significantly earlier in the predementia phase than the change points for learning. Savings had one change point, 5.3 (95% CI: 3.56, 7.04) years before diagnosis. Conclusion: Both learning and DFR showed similar profiles of decline in the years prior to the clinical diagnosis of AD. When delayed recall was adjusted for initial learning, the measure was less sensitive to early disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Dementia
Alzheimer Disease
Learning
Confidence Intervals
Baltimore
Retention (Psychology)
Short-Term Memory
Longitudinal Studies

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • free and cued selective reminding test
  • memory disorders
  • preclinical dementia
  • prospective studies
  • retention
  • verbal learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Timing of onset and rate of decline in learning and retention in the pre-dementia phase of Alzheimer's disease. / Grober, Ellen; An, Yang; Lipton, Richard B.; Kawas, Claudia; Resnick, Susan M.

In: Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4584be4603db4aadb43ea06c382679a3,
title = "Timing of onset and rate of decline in learning and retention in the pre-dementia phase of Alzheimer's disease",
abstract = "Objective: To examine trajectories of declines in learning and retention during the predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (pFCSRT+IR). Method: Learning was defined by the sum of free recall over three test trials. Retention was defined in two ways: by delayed free recall (DFR) and by savings; DFR adjusted for learning. The performances of 217 incident AD cases from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) were aligned based on the time that AD was first diagnosed. The predementia phase of learning and retention decline was assessed using change point models in which cognitive trajectories are described by a series of linear components with knots delineating times of accelerating decline. Results: Trajectories for both learning and DFR had two change points: the first at 6.58 (95{\%} confidence intervals (CI): 6.56, 6.60) to 7.29 (95{\%} CI: 6.13, 8.46) years before diagnosis followed by gradual decline over the next 4 years, and a second acceleration of decline 1.89 (0.56, 3.24) to 2.93 (95{\%} CI: 1.56, 4.30) years before diagnosis. The change points for DFR were not significantly earlier in the predementia phase than the change points for learning. Savings had one change point, 5.3 (95{\%} CI: 3.56, 7.04) years before diagnosis. Conclusion: Both learning and DFR showed similar profiles of decline in the years prior to the clinical diagnosis of AD. When delayed recall was adjusted for initial learning, the measure was less sensitive to early disease.",
keywords = "Alzheimer's disease, free and cued selective reminding test, memory disorders, preclinical dementia, prospective studies, retention, verbal learning",
author = "Ellen Grober and Yang An and Lipton, {Richard B.} and Claudia Kawas and Resnick, {Susan M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1355617719000304",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society",
issn = "1355-6177",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Timing of onset and rate of decline in learning and retention in the pre-dementia phase of Alzheimer's disease

AU - Grober, Ellen

AU - An, Yang

AU - Lipton, Richard B.

AU - Kawas, Claudia

AU - Resnick, Susan M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Objective: To examine trajectories of declines in learning and retention during the predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (pFCSRT+IR). Method: Learning was defined by the sum of free recall over three test trials. Retention was defined in two ways: by delayed free recall (DFR) and by savings; DFR adjusted for learning. The performances of 217 incident AD cases from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) were aligned based on the time that AD was first diagnosed. The predementia phase of learning and retention decline was assessed using change point models in which cognitive trajectories are described by a series of linear components with knots delineating times of accelerating decline. Results: Trajectories for both learning and DFR had two change points: the first at 6.58 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.56, 6.60) to 7.29 (95% CI: 6.13, 8.46) years before diagnosis followed by gradual decline over the next 4 years, and a second acceleration of decline 1.89 (0.56, 3.24) to 2.93 (95% CI: 1.56, 4.30) years before diagnosis. The change points for DFR were not significantly earlier in the predementia phase than the change points for learning. Savings had one change point, 5.3 (95% CI: 3.56, 7.04) years before diagnosis. Conclusion: Both learning and DFR showed similar profiles of decline in the years prior to the clinical diagnosis of AD. When delayed recall was adjusted for initial learning, the measure was less sensitive to early disease.

AB - Objective: To examine trajectories of declines in learning and retention during the predementia phase of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (pFCSRT+IR). Method: Learning was defined by the sum of free recall over three test trials. Retention was defined in two ways: by delayed free recall (DFR) and by savings; DFR adjusted for learning. The performances of 217 incident AD cases from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) were aligned based on the time that AD was first diagnosed. The predementia phase of learning and retention decline was assessed using change point models in which cognitive trajectories are described by a series of linear components with knots delineating times of accelerating decline. Results: Trajectories for both learning and DFR had two change points: the first at 6.58 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 6.56, 6.60) to 7.29 (95% CI: 6.13, 8.46) years before diagnosis followed by gradual decline over the next 4 years, and a second acceleration of decline 1.89 (0.56, 3.24) to 2.93 (95% CI: 1.56, 4.30) years before diagnosis. The change points for DFR were not significantly earlier in the predementia phase than the change points for learning. Savings had one change point, 5.3 (95% CI: 3.56, 7.04) years before diagnosis. Conclusion: Both learning and DFR showed similar profiles of decline in the years prior to the clinical diagnosis of AD. When delayed recall was adjusted for initial learning, the measure was less sensitive to early disease.

KW - Alzheimer's disease

KW - free and cued selective reminding test

KW - memory disorders

KW - preclinical dementia

KW - prospective studies

KW - retention

KW - verbal learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065843244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065843244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1355617719000304

DO - 10.1017/S1355617719000304

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

JF - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

SN - 1355-6177

ER -