Throwing out the rules: Anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations

John J. Foxe, Jeremy W. Murphy, Pierfilippo De Sanctis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We assessed the role of alpha-band oscillatory activity during a task-switching design that required participants to switch between an auditory and a visual task, while task-relevant audiovisual inputs were simultaneously presented. Instructional cues informed participants which task to perform on a given trial and we assessed alpha-band power in the short 1.35-s period intervening between the cue and the task-imperative stimuli, on the premise that attentional biasing mechanisms would be deployed to resolve competition between the auditory and visual inputs. Prior work had shown that alpha-band activity was differentially deployed depending on the modality of the cued task. Here, we asked whether this activity would, in turn, be differentially deployed depending on whether participants had just made a switch of task or were being asked to simply repeat the task. It is well established that performance speed and accuracy are poorer on switch than on repeat trials. Here, however, the use of instructional cues completely mitigated these classic switch-costs. Measures of alpha-band synchronisation and desynchronisation showed that there was indeed greater and earlier differential deployment of alpha-band activity on switch vs. repeat trials. Contrary to our hypothesis, this differential effect was entirely due to changes in the amount of desynchronisation observed during switch and repeat trials of the visual task, with more desynchronisation over both posterior and frontal scalp regions during switch-visual trials. These data imply that particularly vigorous, and essentially fully effective, anticipatory biasing mechanisms resolved the competition between competing auditory and visual inputs when a rapid switch of task was required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1960-1972
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Journal of Neuroscience
Volume39
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Cues
Scalp
Costs and Cost Analysis
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Biasing
  • Cueing
  • EEG
  • Suppression
  • Task-switching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Throwing out the rules : Anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations. / Foxe, John J.; Murphy, Jeremy W.; De Sanctis, Pierfilippo.

In: European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 39, No. 11, 2014, p. 1960-1972.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Foxe, John J. ; Murphy, Jeremy W. ; De Sanctis, Pierfilippo. / Throwing out the rules : Anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations. In: European Journal of Neuroscience. 2014 ; Vol. 39, No. 11. pp. 1960-1972.
@article{e494085d023e4c9fa4b3556cbfabb00e,
title = "Throwing out the rules: Anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations",
abstract = "We assessed the role of alpha-band oscillatory activity during a task-switching design that required participants to switch between an auditory and a visual task, while task-relevant audiovisual inputs were simultaneously presented. Instructional cues informed participants which task to perform on a given trial and we assessed alpha-band power in the short 1.35-s period intervening between the cue and the task-imperative stimuli, on the premise that attentional biasing mechanisms would be deployed to resolve competition between the auditory and visual inputs. Prior work had shown that alpha-band activity was differentially deployed depending on the modality of the cued task. Here, we asked whether this activity would, in turn, be differentially deployed depending on whether participants had just made a switch of task or were being asked to simply repeat the task. It is well established that performance speed and accuracy are poorer on switch than on repeat trials. Here, however, the use of instructional cues completely mitigated these classic switch-costs. Measures of alpha-band synchronisation and desynchronisation showed that there was indeed greater and earlier differential deployment of alpha-band activity on switch vs. repeat trials. Contrary to our hypothesis, this differential effect was entirely due to changes in the amount of desynchronisation observed during switch and repeat trials of the visual task, with more desynchronisation over both posterior and frontal scalp regions during switch-visual trials. These data imply that particularly vigorous, and essentially fully effective, anticipatory biasing mechanisms resolved the competition between competing auditory and visual inputs when a rapid switch of task was required.",
keywords = "Attention, Biasing, Cueing, EEG, Suppression, Task-switching",
author = "Foxe, {John J.} and Murphy, {Jeremy W.} and {De Sanctis}, Pierfilippo",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/ejn.12577",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1960--1972",
journal = "European Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0953-816X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Throwing out the rules

T2 - Anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations

AU - Foxe, John J.

AU - Murphy, Jeremy W.

AU - De Sanctis, Pierfilippo

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We assessed the role of alpha-band oscillatory activity during a task-switching design that required participants to switch between an auditory and a visual task, while task-relevant audiovisual inputs were simultaneously presented. Instructional cues informed participants which task to perform on a given trial and we assessed alpha-band power in the short 1.35-s period intervening between the cue and the task-imperative stimuli, on the premise that attentional biasing mechanisms would be deployed to resolve competition between the auditory and visual inputs. Prior work had shown that alpha-band activity was differentially deployed depending on the modality of the cued task. Here, we asked whether this activity would, in turn, be differentially deployed depending on whether participants had just made a switch of task or were being asked to simply repeat the task. It is well established that performance speed and accuracy are poorer on switch than on repeat trials. Here, however, the use of instructional cues completely mitigated these classic switch-costs. Measures of alpha-band synchronisation and desynchronisation showed that there was indeed greater and earlier differential deployment of alpha-band activity on switch vs. repeat trials. Contrary to our hypothesis, this differential effect was entirely due to changes in the amount of desynchronisation observed during switch and repeat trials of the visual task, with more desynchronisation over both posterior and frontal scalp regions during switch-visual trials. These data imply that particularly vigorous, and essentially fully effective, anticipatory biasing mechanisms resolved the competition between competing auditory and visual inputs when a rapid switch of task was required.

AB - We assessed the role of alpha-band oscillatory activity during a task-switching design that required participants to switch between an auditory and a visual task, while task-relevant audiovisual inputs were simultaneously presented. Instructional cues informed participants which task to perform on a given trial and we assessed alpha-band power in the short 1.35-s period intervening between the cue and the task-imperative stimuli, on the premise that attentional biasing mechanisms would be deployed to resolve competition between the auditory and visual inputs. Prior work had shown that alpha-band activity was differentially deployed depending on the modality of the cued task. Here, we asked whether this activity would, in turn, be differentially deployed depending on whether participants had just made a switch of task or were being asked to simply repeat the task. It is well established that performance speed and accuracy are poorer on switch than on repeat trials. Here, however, the use of instructional cues completely mitigated these classic switch-costs. Measures of alpha-band synchronisation and desynchronisation showed that there was indeed greater and earlier differential deployment of alpha-band activity on switch vs. repeat trials. Contrary to our hypothesis, this differential effect was entirely due to changes in the amount of desynchronisation observed during switch and repeat trials of the visual task, with more desynchronisation over both posterior and frontal scalp regions during switch-visual trials. These data imply that particularly vigorous, and essentially fully effective, anticipatory biasing mechanisms resolved the competition between competing auditory and visual inputs when a rapid switch of task was required.

KW - Attention

KW - Biasing

KW - Cueing

KW - EEG

KW - Suppression

KW - Task-switching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901693953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901693953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ejn.12577

DO - 10.1111/ejn.12577

M3 - Article

C2 - 24689983

AN - SCOPUS:84901693953

VL - 39

SP - 1960

EP - 1972

JO - European Journal of Neuroscience

JF - European Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0953-816X

IS - 11

ER -