The readability, suitability, and content features of eczema action plans in the United States

Thomas Stringer, H. Shonna Yin, Julia Gittler, Paul Curtiss, Amanda Schneider, Vikash S. Oza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Little is known about the reading grade level (readability), appropriateness of design (suitability), and content variability of written eczema action plans (EAPs), which can impact the effectiveness of these patient education tools. Here, we assess the readability, suitability, and content of EAPs currently used by pediatric dermatologists in the United States. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of EAPs submitted by members of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (n = 26). Readability, suitability, and content of sampled plans were systematically assessed. Results: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 9.0 (2.1); one in five was written at the recommended level of 6th grade or lower. While the majority of EAPs were found to be adequately suitable, one in five was unsuitable and only two superior. Documents scored most poorly in layout/design and learning stimulation. Plans scored best in the categories of content and literacy demand. EAPs focused on similar content themes, though specific recommendations and descriptors of atopic dermatitis (AD) disease states varied considerably. Conclusions: The health literacy burden of EAPs in the United States could be lowered by improving their readability, incorporating graphics, stimulating reader engagement, and developing standards for how AD flares are defined.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)800-807
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Dermatology
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Reading
Health Literacy
Patient Education
Cross-Sectional Studies
Learning
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • atopic dermatitis
  • eczema
  • health care delivery
  • inflammatory disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Dermatology

Cite this

The readability, suitability, and content features of eczema action plans in the United States. / Stringer, Thomas; Yin, H. Shonna; Gittler, Julia; Curtiss, Paul; Schneider, Amanda; Oza, Vikash S.

In: Pediatric Dermatology, Vol. 35, No. 6, 01.11.2018, p. 800-807.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stringer, Thomas ; Yin, H. Shonna ; Gittler, Julia ; Curtiss, Paul ; Schneider, Amanda ; Oza, Vikash S. / The readability, suitability, and content features of eczema action plans in the United States. In: Pediatric Dermatology. 2018 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 800-807.
@article{c6ee9bf6ec834393b8e5d50946c1661d,
title = "The readability, suitability, and content features of eczema action plans in the United States",
abstract = "Background/Objectives: Little is known about the reading grade level (readability), appropriateness of design (suitability), and content variability of written eczema action plans (EAPs), which can impact the effectiveness of these patient education tools. Here, we assess the readability, suitability, and content of EAPs currently used by pediatric dermatologists in the United States. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of EAPs submitted by members of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (n = 26). Readability, suitability, and content of sampled plans were systematically assessed. Results: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 9.0 (2.1); one in five was written at the recommended level of 6th grade or lower. While the majority of EAPs were found to be adequately suitable, one in five was unsuitable and only two superior. Documents scored most poorly in layout/design and learning stimulation. Plans scored best in the categories of content and literacy demand. EAPs focused on similar content themes, though specific recommendations and descriptors of atopic dermatitis (AD) disease states varied considerably. Conclusions: The health literacy burden of EAPs in the United States could be lowered by improving their readability, incorporating graphics, stimulating reader engagement, and developing standards for how AD flares are defined.",
keywords = "atopic dermatitis, eczema, health care delivery, inflammatory disorders",
author = "Thomas Stringer and Yin, {H. Shonna} and Julia Gittler and Paul Curtiss and Amanda Schneider and Oza, {Vikash S.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pde.13682",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "800--807",
journal = "Pediatric Dermatology",
issn = "0736-8046",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The readability, suitability, and content features of eczema action plans in the United States

AU - Stringer, Thomas

AU - Yin, H. Shonna

AU - Gittler, Julia

AU - Curtiss, Paul

AU - Schneider, Amanda

AU - Oza, Vikash S.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Background/Objectives: Little is known about the reading grade level (readability), appropriateness of design (suitability), and content variability of written eczema action plans (EAPs), which can impact the effectiveness of these patient education tools. Here, we assess the readability, suitability, and content of EAPs currently used by pediatric dermatologists in the United States. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of EAPs submitted by members of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (n = 26). Readability, suitability, and content of sampled plans were systematically assessed. Results: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 9.0 (2.1); one in five was written at the recommended level of 6th grade or lower. While the majority of EAPs were found to be adequately suitable, one in five was unsuitable and only two superior. Documents scored most poorly in layout/design and learning stimulation. Plans scored best in the categories of content and literacy demand. EAPs focused on similar content themes, though specific recommendations and descriptors of atopic dermatitis (AD) disease states varied considerably. Conclusions: The health literacy burden of EAPs in the United States could be lowered by improving their readability, incorporating graphics, stimulating reader engagement, and developing standards for how AD flares are defined.

AB - Background/Objectives: Little is known about the reading grade level (readability), appropriateness of design (suitability), and content variability of written eczema action plans (EAPs), which can impact the effectiveness of these patient education tools. Here, we assess the readability, suitability, and content of EAPs currently used by pediatric dermatologists in the United States. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of EAPs submitted by members of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (n = 26). Readability, suitability, and content of sampled plans were systematically assessed. Results: Mean (SD) reading grade level was 9.0 (2.1); one in five was written at the recommended level of 6th grade or lower. While the majority of EAPs were found to be adequately suitable, one in five was unsuitable and only two superior. Documents scored most poorly in layout/design and learning stimulation. Plans scored best in the categories of content and literacy demand. EAPs focused on similar content themes, though specific recommendations and descriptors of atopic dermatitis (AD) disease states varied considerably. Conclusions: The health literacy burden of EAPs in the United States could be lowered by improving their readability, incorporating graphics, stimulating reader engagement, and developing standards for how AD flares are defined.

KW - atopic dermatitis

KW - eczema

KW - health care delivery

KW - inflammatory disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054917521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054917521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pde.13682

DO - 10.1111/pde.13682

M3 - Article

C2 - 30318631

AN - SCOPUS:85054917521

VL - 35

SP - 800

EP - 807

JO - Pediatric Dermatology

JF - Pediatric Dermatology

SN - 0736-8046

IS - 6

ER -