The effect of physician solicitation approaches on ability to identify patient concerns

Lawrence Dyche, Deborah M. Swiderski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

CONTEXT: Studies showing that physicians often interrupt the patient's opening statement assume that this compromises data collection. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between such interruptions and physician accuracy in identifying patient concerns. DESIGN: This study replicates the Beckman-Frankel methodology and adds exit interviews to assess physician understanding. The authors audiotaped a convenience sample of 70 encounters and surveyed both parties following the visit. SETTING: A community-based ambulatory clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residents (77%) and attending physicians and their adult, English-speaking patients who were primarily low income and ethnic minority. OUTCOME MEASURE: The Index of Understanding measures patient-physician problem list concordance. It is the percentage of patient problems, obtained on exit, that the physician correctly identifies. RESULTS: In 26% of the visits, patients were allowed to complete their agenda without interruption; in 37% the physicians interrupted; and in 37% no inquiry about agenda was made in the first 5 minutes. Neither physician experience nor their assessment of time pressure or medical difficulty was associated with these rates. Exit interviews showed no significant difference in Index of Understanding between those involving completion of agenda (84.6%) and those involving patient interruption (82.4%) (P=.83). But when the physician did not solicit an agenda, the concordance was 59.2%, significantly lower than either the completion (P=.014) or the interruption group (P=.013). CONCLUSION: Interruption as defined by Beckman-Frankel does not curtail ability to identify patient concerns, but failure to ask for the patient's agenda associates with a 24% reduction in physician understanding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-270
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Physicians
Interviews
Internal Medicine

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Problem list concordance
  • Solicitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

The effect of physician solicitation approaches on ability to identify patient concerns. / Dyche, Lawrence; Swiderski, Deborah M.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 267-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cccc4a4612b34635836b537158bb93aa,
title = "The effect of physician solicitation approaches on ability to identify patient concerns",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Studies showing that physicians often interrupt the patient's opening statement assume that this compromises data collection. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between such interruptions and physician accuracy in identifying patient concerns. DESIGN: This study replicates the Beckman-Frankel methodology and adds exit interviews to assess physician understanding. The authors audiotaped a convenience sample of 70 encounters and surveyed both parties following the visit. SETTING: A community-based ambulatory clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residents (77{\%}) and attending physicians and their adult, English-speaking patients who were primarily low income and ethnic minority. OUTCOME MEASURE: The Index of Understanding measures patient-physician problem list concordance. It is the percentage of patient problems, obtained on exit, that the physician correctly identifies. RESULTS: In 26{\%} of the visits, patients were allowed to complete their agenda without interruption; in 37{\%} the physicians interrupted; and in 37{\%} no inquiry about agenda was made in the first 5 minutes. Neither physician experience nor their assessment of time pressure or medical difficulty was associated with these rates. Exit interviews showed no significant difference in Index of Understanding between those involving completion of agenda (84.6{\%}) and those involving patient interruption (82.4{\%}) (P=.83). But when the physician did not solicit an agenda, the concordance was 59.2{\%}, significantly lower than either the completion (P=.014) or the interruption group (P=.013). CONCLUSION: Interruption as defined by Beckman-Frankel does not curtail ability to identify patient concerns, but failure to ask for the patient's agenda associates with a 24{\%} reduction in physician understanding.",
keywords = "Communication, Problem list concordance, Solicitation",
author = "Lawrence Dyche and Swiderski, {Deborah M.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40266.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "267--270",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of physician solicitation approaches on ability to identify patient concerns

AU - Dyche, Lawrence

AU - Swiderski, Deborah M.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - CONTEXT: Studies showing that physicians often interrupt the patient's opening statement assume that this compromises data collection. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between such interruptions and physician accuracy in identifying patient concerns. DESIGN: This study replicates the Beckman-Frankel methodology and adds exit interviews to assess physician understanding. The authors audiotaped a convenience sample of 70 encounters and surveyed both parties following the visit. SETTING: A community-based ambulatory clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residents (77%) and attending physicians and their adult, English-speaking patients who were primarily low income and ethnic minority. OUTCOME MEASURE: The Index of Understanding measures patient-physician problem list concordance. It is the percentage of patient problems, obtained on exit, that the physician correctly identifies. RESULTS: In 26% of the visits, patients were allowed to complete their agenda without interruption; in 37% the physicians interrupted; and in 37% no inquiry about agenda was made in the first 5 minutes. Neither physician experience nor their assessment of time pressure or medical difficulty was associated with these rates. Exit interviews showed no significant difference in Index of Understanding between those involving completion of agenda (84.6%) and those involving patient interruption (82.4%) (P=.83). But when the physician did not solicit an agenda, the concordance was 59.2%, significantly lower than either the completion (P=.014) or the interruption group (P=.013). CONCLUSION: Interruption as defined by Beckman-Frankel does not curtail ability to identify patient concerns, but failure to ask for the patient's agenda associates with a 24% reduction in physician understanding.

AB - CONTEXT: Studies showing that physicians often interrupt the patient's opening statement assume that this compromises data collection. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between such interruptions and physician accuracy in identifying patient concerns. DESIGN: This study replicates the Beckman-Frankel methodology and adds exit interviews to assess physician understanding. The authors audiotaped a convenience sample of 70 encounters and surveyed both parties following the visit. SETTING: A community-based ambulatory clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Internal medicine residents (77%) and attending physicians and their adult, English-speaking patients who were primarily low income and ethnic minority. OUTCOME MEASURE: The Index of Understanding measures patient-physician problem list concordance. It is the percentage of patient problems, obtained on exit, that the physician correctly identifies. RESULTS: In 26% of the visits, patients were allowed to complete their agenda without interruption; in 37% the physicians interrupted; and in 37% no inquiry about agenda was made in the first 5 minutes. Neither physician experience nor their assessment of time pressure or medical difficulty was associated with these rates. Exit interviews showed no significant difference in Index of Understanding between those involving completion of agenda (84.6%) and those involving patient interruption (82.4%) (P=.83). But when the physician did not solicit an agenda, the concordance was 59.2%, significantly lower than either the completion (P=.014) or the interruption group (P=.013). CONCLUSION: Interruption as defined by Beckman-Frankel does not curtail ability to identify patient concerns, but failure to ask for the patient's agenda associates with a 24% reduction in physician understanding.

KW - Communication

KW - Problem list concordance

KW - Solicitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18244378235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18244378235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40266.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40266.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 15836531

AN - SCOPUS:18244378235

VL - 20

SP - 267

EP - 270

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 3

ER -