The cost of improving care: A multisite economic analysis of hospital resource use for implementing recommended postpartum contraception programmes

Vivian B. Ling, Erika E. Levi, Amy R. Harrington, Nikki B. Zite, Saul D. Rivas, Vanessa K. Dalton, Roger Smith, Michelle H. Moniz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The costs of quality improvement efforts in real-world settings are often unquantified. Better understanding could guide appropriate resource utilisation and drive efficiency. Immediate postpartum contraceptive care (ie, placement of an intrauterine device or contraceptive implant during hospitalisation for childbirth) represents an excellent case study for examining costs, because recommended services are largely unavailable and adoption requires significant effort. We therefore evaluated the cost of implementing immediate postpartum contraceptive services at four academic centres and one private hospital in USA. Methods In this mixed-methods cost analysis, implementation activities were retrospectively identified using standardised data collection. Activities were categorised as preimplementation activities (infrastructure building, tool creation and stakeholder engagement) or execution activities (workforce training and process refinement). Costs were assigned based on national median salaries for the roles of individuals involved. Cross-case comparison and rapid qualitative analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research were used to identify factors driving cost variation observed across sites. Results On average, implementation activities required 204 hours (range 119-368), with this time costing $14 433.94 (range $9955.61-$23 690.49), and involving 9 (range 7-11) key team members per site. Preimplementation activities required more resources than execution activities (preimplementation: average 173 hours, $11 573.25; execution: average 31 hours, $2860.67). Sites that used lower-cost employees (eg, shifting tasks from a physician to a project manager) observed lower costs per hour for implementation activities. Implementation activities and costs were associated with local contextual factors, including stakeholder acceptance, integration of employees and infrastructure readiness for the change effort. Conclusions Our findings provide the first estimates of health system costs for adopting recommended contraceptive care in maternity units in USA. More broadly, our findings suggest that the budget impact of improvement efforts may vary widely depending on local context.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)658-667
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2021

Keywords

  • cost-effectiveness
  • implementation science
  • obstetrics and gynecology
  • quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The cost of improving care: A multisite economic analysis of hospital resource use for implementing recommended postpartum contraception programmes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this