Survey of current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education in the United States

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education across various medical specialties in the United States. Materials and methods: A survey regarding musculoskeletal ultrasound education was sent to all program directors for diagnostic radiology and physical medicine rehabilitation residency programs, as well as adult rheumatology and sports medicine fellowship programs in the United States. The survey, sent in July 2015, queried the presence of formal musculoskeletal ultrasound training, the components of such training and case volume for trainees. Results: Response rates were 23, 25, 28 and 33 % for physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, rheumatology and sports medicine programs, respectively. Among respondents, musculoskeletal ultrasound training was present in 65 % of radiology programs, 88 % of sports medicine programs, 90 % of rheumatology programs, and 100 % of physical medicine and rehabilitation programs. Most programs utilized didactic lectures, followed by hands-on scanning. The majority of programs without current training intend to implement such training within 5 years, although radiology programs reported the lowest likelihood of this happening. Most program directors believed that musculoskeletal ultrasound education is important for their trainees, and is of greater importance than it was 10 years ago. Case volume was lowest for radiology trainees and highest for sports medicine trainees. Conclusion: Among respondents, the majority of diagnostic radiology programs offer musculoskeletal ultrasound training. However, this experience is even more widespread in other medical specialties, and hands-on training and experience tend to be greater in other specialties than in radiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)475-482
Number of pages8
JournalSkeletal Radiology
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Fingerprint

Radiology
Sports Medicine
Education
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Rheumatology
Medicine
Internship and Residency
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Curriculum
  • Education
  • Fellowship
  • Musculoskeletal ultrasound
  • Residency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{2a0484b1006f4b7087f437b36c7c78dd,
title = "Survey of current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education in the United States",
abstract = "Objective: To determine current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education across various medical specialties in the United States. Materials and methods: A survey regarding musculoskeletal ultrasound education was sent to all program directors for diagnostic radiology and physical medicine rehabilitation residency programs, as well as adult rheumatology and sports medicine fellowship programs in the United States. The survey, sent in July 2015, queried the presence of formal musculoskeletal ultrasound training, the components of such training and case volume for trainees. Results: Response rates were 23, 25, 28 and 33 {\%} for physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, rheumatology and sports medicine programs, respectively. Among respondents, musculoskeletal ultrasound training was present in 65 {\%} of radiology programs, 88 {\%} of sports medicine programs, 90 {\%} of rheumatology programs, and 100 {\%} of physical medicine and rehabilitation programs. Most programs utilized didactic lectures, followed by hands-on scanning. The majority of programs without current training intend to implement such training within 5 years, although radiology programs reported the lowest likelihood of this happening. Most program directors believed that musculoskeletal ultrasound education is important for their trainees, and is of greater importance than it was 10 years ago. Case volume was lowest for radiology trainees and highest for sports medicine trainees. Conclusion: Among respondents, the majority of diagnostic radiology programs offer musculoskeletal ultrasound training. However, this experience is even more widespread in other medical specialties, and hands-on training and experience tend to be greater in other specialties than in radiology.",
keywords = "Curriculum, Education, Fellowship, Musculoskeletal ultrasound, Residency",
author = "Berko, {Netanel S.} and Goldberg-Stein, {Shlomit A.} and Thornhill, {Beverly Ann} and Mordecai Koenigsberg",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00256-015-2324-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "475--482",
journal = "Skeletal Radiology",
issn = "0364-2348",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Survey of current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education in the United States

AU - Berko, Netanel S.

AU - Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit A.

AU - Thornhill, Beverly Ann

AU - Koenigsberg, Mordecai

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Objective: To determine current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education across various medical specialties in the United States. Materials and methods: A survey regarding musculoskeletal ultrasound education was sent to all program directors for diagnostic radiology and physical medicine rehabilitation residency programs, as well as adult rheumatology and sports medicine fellowship programs in the United States. The survey, sent in July 2015, queried the presence of formal musculoskeletal ultrasound training, the components of such training and case volume for trainees. Results: Response rates were 23, 25, 28 and 33 % for physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, rheumatology and sports medicine programs, respectively. Among respondents, musculoskeletal ultrasound training was present in 65 % of radiology programs, 88 % of sports medicine programs, 90 % of rheumatology programs, and 100 % of physical medicine and rehabilitation programs. Most programs utilized didactic lectures, followed by hands-on scanning. The majority of programs without current training intend to implement such training within 5 years, although radiology programs reported the lowest likelihood of this happening. Most program directors believed that musculoskeletal ultrasound education is important for their trainees, and is of greater importance than it was 10 years ago. Case volume was lowest for radiology trainees and highest for sports medicine trainees. Conclusion: Among respondents, the majority of diagnostic radiology programs offer musculoskeletal ultrasound training. However, this experience is even more widespread in other medical specialties, and hands-on training and experience tend to be greater in other specialties than in radiology.

AB - Objective: To determine current trends in postgraduate musculoskeletal ultrasound education across various medical specialties in the United States. Materials and methods: A survey regarding musculoskeletal ultrasound education was sent to all program directors for diagnostic radiology and physical medicine rehabilitation residency programs, as well as adult rheumatology and sports medicine fellowship programs in the United States. The survey, sent in July 2015, queried the presence of formal musculoskeletal ultrasound training, the components of such training and case volume for trainees. Results: Response rates were 23, 25, 28 and 33 % for physical medicine and rehabilitation, radiology, rheumatology and sports medicine programs, respectively. Among respondents, musculoskeletal ultrasound training was present in 65 % of radiology programs, 88 % of sports medicine programs, 90 % of rheumatology programs, and 100 % of physical medicine and rehabilitation programs. Most programs utilized didactic lectures, followed by hands-on scanning. The majority of programs without current training intend to implement such training within 5 years, although radiology programs reported the lowest likelihood of this happening. Most program directors believed that musculoskeletal ultrasound education is important for their trainees, and is of greater importance than it was 10 years ago. Case volume was lowest for radiology trainees and highest for sports medicine trainees. Conclusion: Among respondents, the majority of diagnostic radiology programs offer musculoskeletal ultrasound training. However, this experience is even more widespread in other medical specialties, and hands-on training and experience tend to be greater in other specialties than in radiology.

KW - Curriculum

KW - Education

KW - Fellowship

KW - Musculoskeletal ultrasound

KW - Residency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958171012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958171012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00256-015-2324-0

DO - 10.1007/s00256-015-2324-0

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 475

EP - 482

JO - Skeletal Radiology

JF - Skeletal Radiology

SN - 0364-2348

IS - 4

ER -