SU‐FF‐J‐42

Phase Lag Measurements of Abdominal Organs Relative to An External Marker Block Using Retrospective 4D CT Imaging

E. Brandner, A. wu, H. Chen, D. Heron, K. Komanduri, Shalom Kalnicki, K. Gerszten, S. Burton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to quantify the phase lag of superior‐inferior abdominal organ motion relative to an external marker block used to monitor respiratory motion. The diaphragm, liver, spleen, and kidneys were studied. Method and Materials: A 4DCT (GE Medical System, Waukesha, Wisconsin) scan correlated with respiratory motion using the Real‐Time Position Management (RPM) Respiratory Gating System (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was used to acquire scans of 10 patients. Up to 10 images at each slice location within one breathing cycle were acquired and sorted into respiratory phases evenly distributed in time. The superior and inferior edge of each organ was identified, and the average of these positions was used as the S‐I position of the organ. The anterior edge of the external marker block was also recorded. These positions were identified for all respiratory phases. The data was then fit with a cosine squared function. The argument of the function was the observed respiratory phase plus a starting phase. The starting phase was then adjusted until the value generating the least square deviation among all measurements of the particular organ, diaphragm, or marker block for all phases was found. The difference of starting phase minus that of the marker block is then recorded as the phase lag relative to the marker block. Results: No phase lag is greater than 36° which is the minimum difference between successive phase for a respiratory cycle divided into 10 phases. Conclusion: The external marker block used to monitor respiration is observed to be in phase the motion of the abdominal organs and diaphragm within the measurement accuracy. Conflict of Interest: Software provided by GE Medical Systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1929
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
Diaphragm
Respiration
Conflict of Interest
Least-Squares Analysis
Respiratory System
Software
Spleen
Kidney
Liver

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐J‐42 : Phase Lag Measurements of Abdominal Organs Relative to An External Marker Block Using Retrospective 4D CT Imaging. / Brandner, E.; wu, A.; Chen, H.; Heron, D.; Komanduri, K.; Kalnicki, Shalom; Gerszten, K.; Burton, S.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2005, p. 1929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brandner, E. ; wu, A. ; Chen, H. ; Heron, D. ; Komanduri, K. ; Kalnicki, Shalom ; Gerszten, K. ; Burton, S. / SU‐FF‐J‐42 : Phase Lag Measurements of Abdominal Organs Relative to An External Marker Block Using Retrospective 4D CT Imaging. In: Medical Physics. 2005 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 1929.
@article{ad88202f84f6430187d22c923d2c8c15,
title = "SU‐FF‐J‐42: Phase Lag Measurements of Abdominal Organs Relative to An External Marker Block Using Retrospective 4D CT Imaging",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study is to quantify the phase lag of superior‐inferior abdominal organ motion relative to an external marker block used to monitor respiratory motion. The diaphragm, liver, spleen, and kidneys were studied. Method and Materials: A 4DCT (GE Medical System, Waukesha, Wisconsin) scan correlated with respiratory motion using the Real‐Time Position Management (RPM) Respiratory Gating System (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was used to acquire scans of 10 patients. Up to 10 images at each slice location within one breathing cycle were acquired and sorted into respiratory phases evenly distributed in time. The superior and inferior edge of each organ was identified, and the average of these positions was used as the S‐I position of the organ. The anterior edge of the external marker block was also recorded. These positions were identified for all respiratory phases. The data was then fit with a cosine squared function. The argument of the function was the observed respiratory phase plus a starting phase. The starting phase was then adjusted until the value generating the least square deviation among all measurements of the particular organ, diaphragm, or marker block for all phases was found. The difference of starting phase minus that of the marker block is then recorded as the phase lag relative to the marker block. Results: No phase lag is greater than 36° which is the minimum difference between successive phase for a respiratory cycle divided into 10 phases. Conclusion: The external marker block used to monitor respiration is observed to be in phase the motion of the abdominal organs and diaphragm within the measurement accuracy. Conflict of Interest: Software provided by GE Medical Systems.",
author = "E. Brandner and A. wu and H. Chen and D. Heron and K. Komanduri and Shalom Kalnicki and K. Gerszten and S. Burton",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1118/1.1997588",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1929",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐J‐42

T2 - Phase Lag Measurements of Abdominal Organs Relative to An External Marker Block Using Retrospective 4D CT Imaging

AU - Brandner, E.

AU - wu, A.

AU - Chen, H.

AU - Heron, D.

AU - Komanduri, K.

AU - Kalnicki, Shalom

AU - Gerszten, K.

AU - Burton, S.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to quantify the phase lag of superior‐inferior abdominal organ motion relative to an external marker block used to monitor respiratory motion. The diaphragm, liver, spleen, and kidneys were studied. Method and Materials: A 4DCT (GE Medical System, Waukesha, Wisconsin) scan correlated with respiratory motion using the Real‐Time Position Management (RPM) Respiratory Gating System (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was used to acquire scans of 10 patients. Up to 10 images at each slice location within one breathing cycle were acquired and sorted into respiratory phases evenly distributed in time. The superior and inferior edge of each organ was identified, and the average of these positions was used as the S‐I position of the organ. The anterior edge of the external marker block was also recorded. These positions were identified for all respiratory phases. The data was then fit with a cosine squared function. The argument of the function was the observed respiratory phase plus a starting phase. The starting phase was then adjusted until the value generating the least square deviation among all measurements of the particular organ, diaphragm, or marker block for all phases was found. The difference of starting phase minus that of the marker block is then recorded as the phase lag relative to the marker block. Results: No phase lag is greater than 36° which is the minimum difference between successive phase for a respiratory cycle divided into 10 phases. Conclusion: The external marker block used to monitor respiration is observed to be in phase the motion of the abdominal organs and diaphragm within the measurement accuracy. Conflict of Interest: Software provided by GE Medical Systems.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to quantify the phase lag of superior‐inferior abdominal organ motion relative to an external marker block used to monitor respiratory motion. The diaphragm, liver, spleen, and kidneys were studied. Method and Materials: A 4DCT (GE Medical System, Waukesha, Wisconsin) scan correlated with respiratory motion using the Real‐Time Position Management (RPM) Respiratory Gating System (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was used to acquire scans of 10 patients. Up to 10 images at each slice location within one breathing cycle were acquired and sorted into respiratory phases evenly distributed in time. The superior and inferior edge of each organ was identified, and the average of these positions was used as the S‐I position of the organ. The anterior edge of the external marker block was also recorded. These positions were identified for all respiratory phases. The data was then fit with a cosine squared function. The argument of the function was the observed respiratory phase plus a starting phase. The starting phase was then adjusted until the value generating the least square deviation among all measurements of the particular organ, diaphragm, or marker block for all phases was found. The difference of starting phase minus that of the marker block is then recorded as the phase lag relative to the marker block. Results: No phase lag is greater than 36° which is the minimum difference between successive phase for a respiratory cycle divided into 10 phases. Conclusion: The external marker block used to monitor respiration is observed to be in phase the motion of the abdominal organs and diaphragm within the measurement accuracy. Conflict of Interest: Software provided by GE Medical Systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024775870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024775870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1997588

DO - 10.1118/1.1997588

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 1929

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -