Stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator replacement

Douglas Labar, Laura Ponticello, Blagovest Nikolov, Sowdhamani Bellapu, Theodore H. Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. This study aims to assess tolerability and efficacy of stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) pulse generator replacement. Materials and Methods. We carried out an observational, retrospective study, reviewing our experience with VNS generator replacements in 28 epilepsy patients. Results. Seven patients had actual end of battery life (EOBL) (with symptoms), and 21 patients had asymptomatic projected EOBL. When we reprogrammed stimulation parameters postoperatively, 17 of the 28 patients could not tolerate the preoperative baseline current settings, even one year later. There were no differences in pre- vs. postoperative seizure rates between patients who did or did not return to baseline settings. Failure to return to baseline current was not related to previous VNS duration, same- vs. different-battery generator replacements, or antiepileptic medication changes. Conclusions. After VNS generator replacement, patients' common inability to tolerate preoperative current settings does not lead to more seizures. A chronic modification of the vagus nerve system's sensitivity to stimulation changes may be hypothesized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-134
Number of pages3
JournalNeuromodulation
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vagus Nerve
Seizures
Anticonvulsants
Observational Studies
Epilepsy
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Epilepsy
  • Generator replacement
  • Stimulation parameters
  • Vagus nerve stimulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator replacement. / Labar, Douglas; Ponticello, Laura; Nikolov, Blagovest; Bellapu, Sowdhamani; Schwartz, Theodore H.

In: Neuromodulation, Vol. 11, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 132-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Labar, D, Ponticello, L, Nikolov, B, Bellapu, S & Schwartz, TH 2008, 'Stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator replacement', Neuromodulation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 132-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1403.2008.00155.x
Labar, Douglas ; Ponticello, Laura ; Nikolov, Blagovest ; Bellapu, Sowdhamani ; Schwartz, Theodore H. / Stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator replacement. In: Neuromodulation. 2008 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 132-134.
@article{42eaf0f24df241c194f4f87a5e25d84e,
title = "Stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator replacement",
abstract = "Objectives. This study aims to assess tolerability and efficacy of stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) pulse generator replacement. Materials and Methods. We carried out an observational, retrospective study, reviewing our experience with VNS generator replacements in 28 epilepsy patients. Results. Seven patients had actual end of battery life (EOBL) (with symptoms), and 21 patients had asymptomatic projected EOBL. When we reprogrammed stimulation parameters postoperatively, 17 of the 28 patients could not tolerate the preoperative baseline current settings, even one year later. There were no differences in pre- vs. postoperative seizure rates between patients who did or did not return to baseline settings. Failure to return to baseline current was not related to previous VNS duration, same- vs. different-battery generator replacements, or antiepileptic medication changes. Conclusions. After VNS generator replacement, patients' common inability to tolerate preoperative current settings does not lead to more seizures. A chronic modification of the vagus nerve system's sensitivity to stimulation changes may be hypothesized.",
keywords = "Epilepsy, Generator replacement, Stimulation parameters, Vagus nerve stimulation",
author = "Douglas Labar and Laura Ponticello and Blagovest Nikolov and Sowdhamani Bellapu and Schwartz, {Theodore H.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1525-1403.2008.00155.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "132--134",
journal = "Neuromodulation",
issn = "1094-7159",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator replacement

AU - Labar, Douglas

AU - Ponticello, Laura

AU - Nikolov, Blagovest

AU - Bellapu, Sowdhamani

AU - Schwartz, Theodore H.

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Objectives. This study aims to assess tolerability and efficacy of stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) pulse generator replacement. Materials and Methods. We carried out an observational, retrospective study, reviewing our experience with VNS generator replacements in 28 epilepsy patients. Results. Seven patients had actual end of battery life (EOBL) (with symptoms), and 21 patients had asymptomatic projected EOBL. When we reprogrammed stimulation parameters postoperatively, 17 of the 28 patients could not tolerate the preoperative baseline current settings, even one year later. There were no differences in pre- vs. postoperative seizure rates between patients who did or did not return to baseline settings. Failure to return to baseline current was not related to previous VNS duration, same- vs. different-battery generator replacements, or antiepileptic medication changes. Conclusions. After VNS generator replacement, patients' common inability to tolerate preoperative current settings does not lead to more seizures. A chronic modification of the vagus nerve system's sensitivity to stimulation changes may be hypothesized.

AB - Objectives. This study aims to assess tolerability and efficacy of stimulation parameters after vagus nerve stimulator (VNS) pulse generator replacement. Materials and Methods. We carried out an observational, retrospective study, reviewing our experience with VNS generator replacements in 28 epilepsy patients. Results. Seven patients had actual end of battery life (EOBL) (with symptoms), and 21 patients had asymptomatic projected EOBL. When we reprogrammed stimulation parameters postoperatively, 17 of the 28 patients could not tolerate the preoperative baseline current settings, even one year later. There were no differences in pre- vs. postoperative seizure rates between patients who did or did not return to baseline settings. Failure to return to baseline current was not related to previous VNS duration, same- vs. different-battery generator replacements, or antiepileptic medication changes. Conclusions. After VNS generator replacement, patients' common inability to tolerate preoperative current settings does not lead to more seizures. A chronic modification of the vagus nerve system's sensitivity to stimulation changes may be hypothesized.

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Generator replacement

KW - Stimulation parameters

KW - Vagus nerve stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=41749124116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=41749124116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2008.00155.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2008.00155.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 22151047

AN - SCOPUS:41749124116

VL - 11

SP - 132

EP - 134

JO - Neuromodulation

JF - Neuromodulation

SN - 1094-7159

IS - 2

ER -