Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum?

Brian A. O'Shaughnessy, Lawrence G. Lenke, Keith H. Bridwell, Woojin Cho, Lukas P. Zebala, Michael S. Chang, Joshua D. Auerbach, Charles H. Crawford, Linda A. Koester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, single-institution review of adult deformity patients who underwent iliac screw (IS) removal placed during fusion to the sacrum. OBJECTIVE.: To demonstrate whether IS removal offered benefit in terms of hip/buttock pain overlying the IS and whether IS could be removed without significant complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: ISs are effective at countering cantilever forces imparted on sacral pedicle screws. Despite the efficacy of IS fixation, pain or implant prominence can lead to elective IS removal. There has been no study about IS removal in adult spinal deformity patients. METHODS.: A total of 395 consecutive walking adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum with IS fixation and minimum 2-year follow-up met study inclusion criteria. Clinical/radiographical data were analyzed. Because there is no validated pain outcomes instrument specific to this situation, an 8-question IS removal questionnaire was designed and used for the sole purpose of this inquiry, within which a universally accepted numeric rating scale for pain was included. RESULTS.: Twenty-four of 395 (6.1%) patients (2 men and 22 women) with mean age of 50.5 ± 10.8 years underwent elective IS removal at mean 2.6 ±1.3 years from index surgery. Mean follow-up from initial surgery was 6.3 ± 4.0 years. Symptoms included hip/buttock pain in all 24 patients and IS prominence in 5 patients (20.8%). Screw removal was bilateral in 18 (75%) patients and unilateral in 6 (25%) patients. Using a numeric rating pain scale (0-10), hip/buttock pain improved after IS removal: preoperative 6.9 ± 1.8, postoperative 2.0 ± 2.7 (P < 0.05). Patients reported hip/buttock symptoms post-IS removal as "much improved" (78.3%), "somewhat improved" (8.7%), and "unchanged" (13.0%). Two of 24 (8.3%) patients sustained complications from IS removal (wound infection, n = 1; coronal/sagittal imbalance, n = 1). Presented with the same set of circumstances, 22 of 24 (91.7%) patients would have their IS removed again, including one of the patients who had a complication. CONCLUSION.: Of 395 consecutive walking patients who had ISs placed during fusion to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity, 24 (6.1%) underwent elective removal. Patients had a statistically significant improvement in hip/buttock pain after IS removal, and a low prevalence of complications after the procedure was observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1175-1181
Number of pages7
JournalSpine
Volume37
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sacrum
Buttocks
Pain
Hip
Walking
Wound Infection

Keywords

  • adult spinal deformity
  • fusion
  • iliac screw
  • sacrum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

O'Shaughnessy, B. A., Lenke, L. G., Bridwell, K. H., Cho, W., Zebala, L. P., Chang, M. S., ... Koester, L. A. (2012). Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum? Spine, 37(13), 1175-1181. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182426970

Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum? / O'Shaughnessy, Brian A.; Lenke, Lawrence G.; Bridwell, Keith H.; Cho, Woojin; Zebala, Lukas P.; Chang, Michael S.; Auerbach, Joshua D.; Crawford, Charles H.; Koester, Linda A.

In: Spine, Vol. 37, No. 13, 01.06.2012, p. 1175-1181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Shaughnessy, BA, Lenke, LG, Bridwell, KH, Cho, W, Zebala, LP, Chang, MS, Auerbach, JD, Crawford, CH & Koester, LA 2012, 'Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum?', Spine, vol. 37, no. 13, pp. 1175-1181. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182426970
O'Shaughnessy, Brian A. ; Lenke, Lawrence G. ; Bridwell, Keith H. ; Cho, Woojin ; Zebala, Lukas P. ; Chang, Michael S. ; Auerbach, Joshua D. ; Crawford, Charles H. ; Koester, Linda A. / Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum?. In: Spine. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 13. pp. 1175-1181.
@article{77bbd56b384d45dc820197f4a5122c5b,
title = "Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum?",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, single-institution review of adult deformity patients who underwent iliac screw (IS) removal placed during fusion to the sacrum. OBJECTIVE.: To demonstrate whether IS removal offered benefit in terms of hip/buttock pain overlying the IS and whether IS could be removed without significant complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: ISs are effective at countering cantilever forces imparted on sacral pedicle screws. Despite the efficacy of IS fixation, pain or implant prominence can lead to elective IS removal. There has been no study about IS removal in adult spinal deformity patients. METHODS.: A total of 395 consecutive walking adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum with IS fixation and minimum 2-year follow-up met study inclusion criteria. Clinical/radiographical data were analyzed. Because there is no validated pain outcomes instrument specific to this situation, an 8-question IS removal questionnaire was designed and used for the sole purpose of this inquiry, within which a universally accepted numeric rating scale for pain was included. RESULTS.: Twenty-four of 395 (6.1{\%}) patients (2 men and 22 women) with mean age of 50.5 ± 10.8 years underwent elective IS removal at mean 2.6 ±1.3 years from index surgery. Mean follow-up from initial surgery was 6.3 ± 4.0 years. Symptoms included hip/buttock pain in all 24 patients and IS prominence in 5 patients (20.8{\%}). Screw removal was bilateral in 18 (75{\%}) patients and unilateral in 6 (25{\%}) patients. Using a numeric rating pain scale (0-10), hip/buttock pain improved after IS removal: preoperative 6.9 ± 1.8, postoperative 2.0 ± 2.7 (P < 0.05). Patients reported hip/buttock symptoms post-IS removal as {"}much improved{"} (78.3{\%}), {"}somewhat improved{"} (8.7{\%}), and {"}unchanged{"} (13.0{\%}). Two of 24 (8.3{\%}) patients sustained complications from IS removal (wound infection, n = 1; coronal/sagittal imbalance, n = 1). Presented with the same set of circumstances, 22 of 24 (91.7{\%}) patients would have their IS removed again, including one of the patients who had a complication. CONCLUSION.: Of 395 consecutive walking patients who had ISs placed during fusion to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity, 24 (6.1{\%}) underwent elective removal. Patients had a statistically significant improvement in hip/buttock pain after IS removal, and a low prevalence of complications after the procedure was observed.",
keywords = "adult spinal deformity, fusion, iliac screw, sacrum",
author = "O'Shaughnessy, {Brian A.} and Lenke, {Lawrence G.} and Bridwell, {Keith H.} and Woojin Cho and Zebala, {Lukas P.} and Chang, {Michael S.} and Auerbach, {Joshua D.} and Crawford, {Charles H.} and Koester, {Linda A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182426970",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1175--1181",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should symptomatic iliac screws be electively removed in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum?

AU - O'Shaughnessy, Brian A.

AU - Lenke, Lawrence G.

AU - Bridwell, Keith H.

AU - Cho, Woojin

AU - Zebala, Lukas P.

AU - Chang, Michael S.

AU - Auerbach, Joshua D.

AU - Crawford, Charles H.

AU - Koester, Linda A.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, single-institution review of adult deformity patients who underwent iliac screw (IS) removal placed during fusion to the sacrum. OBJECTIVE.: To demonstrate whether IS removal offered benefit in terms of hip/buttock pain overlying the IS and whether IS could be removed without significant complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: ISs are effective at countering cantilever forces imparted on sacral pedicle screws. Despite the efficacy of IS fixation, pain or implant prominence can lead to elective IS removal. There has been no study about IS removal in adult spinal deformity patients. METHODS.: A total of 395 consecutive walking adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum with IS fixation and minimum 2-year follow-up met study inclusion criteria. Clinical/radiographical data were analyzed. Because there is no validated pain outcomes instrument specific to this situation, an 8-question IS removal questionnaire was designed and used for the sole purpose of this inquiry, within which a universally accepted numeric rating scale for pain was included. RESULTS.: Twenty-four of 395 (6.1%) patients (2 men and 22 women) with mean age of 50.5 ± 10.8 years underwent elective IS removal at mean 2.6 ±1.3 years from index surgery. Mean follow-up from initial surgery was 6.3 ± 4.0 years. Symptoms included hip/buttock pain in all 24 patients and IS prominence in 5 patients (20.8%). Screw removal was bilateral in 18 (75%) patients and unilateral in 6 (25%) patients. Using a numeric rating pain scale (0-10), hip/buttock pain improved after IS removal: preoperative 6.9 ± 1.8, postoperative 2.0 ± 2.7 (P < 0.05). Patients reported hip/buttock symptoms post-IS removal as "much improved" (78.3%), "somewhat improved" (8.7%), and "unchanged" (13.0%). Two of 24 (8.3%) patients sustained complications from IS removal (wound infection, n = 1; coronal/sagittal imbalance, n = 1). Presented with the same set of circumstances, 22 of 24 (91.7%) patients would have their IS removed again, including one of the patients who had a complication. CONCLUSION.: Of 395 consecutive walking patients who had ISs placed during fusion to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity, 24 (6.1%) underwent elective removal. Patients had a statistically significant improvement in hip/buttock pain after IS removal, and a low prevalence of complications after the procedure was observed.

AB - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, single-institution review of adult deformity patients who underwent iliac screw (IS) removal placed during fusion to the sacrum. OBJECTIVE.: To demonstrate whether IS removal offered benefit in terms of hip/buttock pain overlying the IS and whether IS could be removed without significant complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: ISs are effective at countering cantilever forces imparted on sacral pedicle screws. Despite the efficacy of IS fixation, pain or implant prominence can lead to elective IS removal. There has been no study about IS removal in adult spinal deformity patients. METHODS.: A total of 395 consecutive walking adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum with IS fixation and minimum 2-year follow-up met study inclusion criteria. Clinical/radiographical data were analyzed. Because there is no validated pain outcomes instrument specific to this situation, an 8-question IS removal questionnaire was designed and used for the sole purpose of this inquiry, within which a universally accepted numeric rating scale for pain was included. RESULTS.: Twenty-four of 395 (6.1%) patients (2 men and 22 women) with mean age of 50.5 ± 10.8 years underwent elective IS removal at mean 2.6 ±1.3 years from index surgery. Mean follow-up from initial surgery was 6.3 ± 4.0 years. Symptoms included hip/buttock pain in all 24 patients and IS prominence in 5 patients (20.8%). Screw removal was bilateral in 18 (75%) patients and unilateral in 6 (25%) patients. Using a numeric rating pain scale (0-10), hip/buttock pain improved after IS removal: preoperative 6.9 ± 1.8, postoperative 2.0 ± 2.7 (P < 0.05). Patients reported hip/buttock symptoms post-IS removal as "much improved" (78.3%), "somewhat improved" (8.7%), and "unchanged" (13.0%). Two of 24 (8.3%) patients sustained complications from IS removal (wound infection, n = 1; coronal/sagittal imbalance, n = 1). Presented with the same set of circumstances, 22 of 24 (91.7%) patients would have their IS removed again, including one of the patients who had a complication. CONCLUSION.: Of 395 consecutive walking patients who had ISs placed during fusion to the sacrum for adult spinal deformity, 24 (6.1%) underwent elective removal. Patients had a statistically significant improvement in hip/buttock pain after IS removal, and a low prevalence of complications after the procedure was observed.

KW - adult spinal deformity

KW - fusion

KW - iliac screw

KW - sacrum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862223782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862223782&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182426970

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182426970

M3 - Article

C2 - 22146291

AN - SCOPUS:84862223782

VL - 37

SP - 1175

EP - 1181

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 13

ER -