Reporting in vitro fertilization cycles to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database: Where have all the cycles gone?

David Kulak, Sangita K. Jindal, Cheongeun Oh, Sara S. Morelli, Scott Kratka, Peter G. McGovern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relationship between live birth rates (LBRs) and the incidence of under-reported cycles by IVF clinics. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): All patients undergoing IVF cycles in the aforementioned clinics. Intervention(s): Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure(s): The reporting percentage (RP), defined as number of cycles with reported pregnancy rates divided by total cycles performed. Results from cryopreservation cycles are only presented by SART if an embryo transfer occurs. Thus, RP decreases as incidence of embryo or oocyte banking cycles increases. The LBRs in women aged

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalFertility and Sterility
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 8 2015

Keywords

  • Clinic summary report
  • Egg freezing
  • Embryo banking
  • In vitro fertilization
  • SART

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting in vitro fertilization cycles to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology database: Where have all the cycles gone?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this