Relationship between the hamilton depression rating scale and the montgomery-...sberg depression rating scale in depressed elderly

A meta-manalysis

Moonseong Heo, Christopher F. Murphy, Barnett S. Meyers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sensitivity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to treatment effects are comparable in geriatric antidepressant randomized controlled trials by developing and validating an equation that links between the two instruments. METHODS: Literature search for this meta-analysis was based on three sources: MEDLINE, a recent related meta-analysis, and experts in geriatric antidepressant trials. The search resulted in 11 relevant geriatric antidepressant trial studies that administered both instruments for symptom ratings. The authors used baseline ratings as a model-building sample and postrandomization ratings as a validation sample. HDRS scores were prorated into HDRS17, a 17-item HDRS, for analysis. The development and validation was based on a total number of 1,874 subjects. RESULTS: The correlations were high between baseline mean HDRS17 and MADRS ratings (r = 0.80; Fisher1/4s z = 1.09, N = 25, p <0.0001) and between postrandomization ratings (r = 0.88, Fisher1/4s z = 1.39, N = 65, p <0.0001). The following equation was derived: HDRS17 = -1.58 + 0.86 x MADRS. The difference between observed and estimated HDRS17 in a validation sample consisting of postrandomization follow-up means did not depend on magnitudes of HDRS17. CONCLUSION: Although generalizability of findings into a broader population could be limited, and the authors could not assess concordance of changes of particular item constructs between HDRS and MADRS ratings, both ratings are comparable in assessing changes in overall depressive symptom severity in response to antidepressants in depressed elderly at aggregated group mean levels.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)899-905
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Antidepressive Agents
Geriatrics
Meta-Analysis
Depression
MEDLINE
Randomized Controlled Trials
Population
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • depression
  • elderly
  • Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
  • meta-analysis
  • Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale
  • randomized controlled trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Relationship between the hamilton depression rating scale and the montgomery-...sberg depression rating scale in depressed elderly : A meta-manalysis. / Heo, Moonseong; Murphy, Christopher F.; Meyers, Barnett S.

In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 15, No. 10, 10.2007, p. 899-905.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bdc165a4de63472daf579bcc27e9033c,
title = "Relationship between the hamilton depression rating scale and the montgomery-...sberg depression rating scale in depressed elderly: A meta-manalysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sensitivity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Montgomery-{\AA}sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to treatment effects are comparable in geriatric antidepressant randomized controlled trials by developing and validating an equation that links between the two instruments. METHODS: Literature search for this meta-analysis was based on three sources: MEDLINE, a recent related meta-analysis, and experts in geriatric antidepressant trials. The search resulted in 11 relevant geriatric antidepressant trial studies that administered both instruments for symptom ratings. The authors used baseline ratings as a model-building sample and postrandomization ratings as a validation sample. HDRS scores were prorated into HDRS17, a 17-item HDRS, for analysis. The development and validation was based on a total number of 1,874 subjects. RESULTS: The correlations were high between baseline mean HDRS17 and MADRS ratings (r = 0.80; Fisher1/4s z = 1.09, N = 25, p <0.0001) and between postrandomization ratings (r = 0.88, Fisher1/4s z = 1.39, N = 65, p <0.0001). The following equation was derived: HDRS17 = -1.58 + 0.86 x MADRS. The difference between observed and estimated HDRS17 in a validation sample consisting of postrandomization follow-up means did not depend on magnitudes of HDRS17. CONCLUSION: Although generalizability of findings into a broader population could be limited, and the authors could not assess concordance of changes of particular item constructs between HDRS and MADRS ratings, both ratings are comparable in assessing changes in overall depressive symptom severity in response to antidepressants in depressed elderly at aggregated group mean levels.",
keywords = "depression, elderly, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, meta-analysis, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, randomized controlled trial",
author = "Moonseong Heo and Murphy, {Christopher F.} and Meyers, {Barnett S.}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/JGP.0b013e318098614e",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "899--905",
journal = "American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "1064-7481",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between the hamilton depression rating scale and the montgomery-...sberg depression rating scale in depressed elderly

T2 - A meta-manalysis

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Murphy, Christopher F.

AU - Meyers, Barnett S.

PY - 2007/10

Y1 - 2007/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sensitivity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to treatment effects are comparable in geriatric antidepressant randomized controlled trials by developing and validating an equation that links between the two instruments. METHODS: Literature search for this meta-analysis was based on three sources: MEDLINE, a recent related meta-analysis, and experts in geriatric antidepressant trials. The search resulted in 11 relevant geriatric antidepressant trial studies that administered both instruments for symptom ratings. The authors used baseline ratings as a model-building sample and postrandomization ratings as a validation sample. HDRS scores were prorated into HDRS17, a 17-item HDRS, for analysis. The development and validation was based on a total number of 1,874 subjects. RESULTS: The correlations were high between baseline mean HDRS17 and MADRS ratings (r = 0.80; Fisher1/4s z = 1.09, N = 25, p <0.0001) and between postrandomization ratings (r = 0.88, Fisher1/4s z = 1.39, N = 65, p <0.0001). The following equation was derived: HDRS17 = -1.58 + 0.86 x MADRS. The difference between observed and estimated HDRS17 in a validation sample consisting of postrandomization follow-up means did not depend on magnitudes of HDRS17. CONCLUSION: Although generalizability of findings into a broader population could be limited, and the authors could not assess concordance of changes of particular item constructs between HDRS and MADRS ratings, both ratings are comparable in assessing changes in overall depressive symptom severity in response to antidepressants in depressed elderly at aggregated group mean levels.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the sensitivity of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to treatment effects are comparable in geriatric antidepressant randomized controlled trials by developing and validating an equation that links between the two instruments. METHODS: Literature search for this meta-analysis was based on three sources: MEDLINE, a recent related meta-analysis, and experts in geriatric antidepressant trials. The search resulted in 11 relevant geriatric antidepressant trial studies that administered both instruments for symptom ratings. The authors used baseline ratings as a model-building sample and postrandomization ratings as a validation sample. HDRS scores were prorated into HDRS17, a 17-item HDRS, for analysis. The development and validation was based on a total number of 1,874 subjects. RESULTS: The correlations were high between baseline mean HDRS17 and MADRS ratings (r = 0.80; Fisher1/4s z = 1.09, N = 25, p <0.0001) and between postrandomization ratings (r = 0.88, Fisher1/4s z = 1.39, N = 65, p <0.0001). The following equation was derived: HDRS17 = -1.58 + 0.86 x MADRS. The difference between observed and estimated HDRS17 in a validation sample consisting of postrandomization follow-up means did not depend on magnitudes of HDRS17. CONCLUSION: Although generalizability of findings into a broader population could be limited, and the authors could not assess concordance of changes of particular item constructs between HDRS and MADRS ratings, both ratings are comparable in assessing changes in overall depressive symptom severity in response to antidepressants in depressed elderly at aggregated group mean levels.

KW - depression

KW - elderly

KW - Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

KW - meta-analysis

KW - Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale

KW - randomized controlled trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38449111725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38449111725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318098614e

DO - 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318098614e

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 899

EP - 905

JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 1064-7481

IS - 10

ER -