Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes

Sejal N. Patel, Victoria L. Mango, Priya Jadeja, Lauren Friedlander, Elise Desperito, Ralph Wynn, Sheldon M. Feldman, Richard Ha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm3 vs. WL-16.3 cm3), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5% vs. WL-7.1%), close margin rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-11.9%) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-9.5%). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-17
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume47
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Segmental Mastectomy
Tumor Burden
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Tumor localization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies : A comparison of surgical outcomes. / Patel, Sejal N.; Mango, Victoria L.; Jadeja, Priya; Friedlander, Lauren; Desperito, Elise; Wynn, Ralph; Feldman, Sheldon M.; Ha, Richard.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 47, 01.01.2018, p. 14-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, Sejal N. ; Mango, Victoria L. ; Jadeja, Priya ; Friedlander, Lauren ; Desperito, Elise ; Wynn, Ralph ; Feldman, Sheldon M. ; Ha, Richard. / Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies : A comparison of surgical outcomes. In: Clinical Imaging. 2018 ; Vol. 47. pp. 14-17.
@article{29e84c26290e4ee4a17b42ad587c40a2,
title = "Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies: A comparison of surgical outcomes",
abstract = "Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm3 vs. WL-16.3 cm3), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5{\%} vs. WL-7.1{\%}), close margin rate (SSL-7.1{\%} vs. WL-11.9{\%}) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1{\%} vs. WL-9.5{\%}). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Tumor localization",
author = "Patel, {Sejal N.} and Mango, {Victoria L.} and Priya Jadeja and Lauren Friedlander and Elise Desperito and Ralph Wynn and Feldman, {Sheldon M.} and Richard Ha",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "14--17",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflector-guided breast tumor localization versus wire localization for lumpectomies

T2 - A comparison of surgical outcomes

AU - Patel, Sejal N.

AU - Mango, Victoria L.

AU - Jadeja, Priya

AU - Friedlander, Lauren

AU - Desperito, Elise

AU - Wynn, Ralph

AU - Feldman, Sheldon M.

AU - Ha, Richard

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm3 vs. WL-16.3 cm3), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5% vs. WL-7.1%), close margin rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-11.9%) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-9.5%). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.

AB - Purpose To compare surgical outcomes of SAVI SCOUT reflector localization (SSL) versus wire localization (WL) for breast tumors. Methods Retrospective review of 42 SSL cases and 42 WL cases. WL patients were consecutively matched for clinical-pathologic features. Final surgical outcome measures were tumor specimen volume, margin status, and re-excision rates. Results No significant differences were present in median specimen volumes (SSL-15.2 cm3 vs. WL-16.3 cm3), positive margin rate (SSL-9.5% vs. WL-7.1%), close margin rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-11.9%) or re-excision rate (SSL-7.1% vs. WL-9.5%). Conclusion SSL is an acceptable alternative to WL with no significant differences in surgical outcomes.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Tumor localization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038211802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038211802&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.07.020

M3 - Article

C2 - 28818762

AN - SCOPUS:85038211802

VL - 47

SP - 14

EP - 17

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

ER -