Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals: Example lists & criteria for their selection & use

Michael Aschner, Sandra Ceccatelli, Mardas Daneshian, Ellen Fritsche, Nina Hasiwa, Thomas Hartung, Helena T. Hogberg, Marcel Leist, Abby Li, William R. Mundy, Stephanie Padilla, Aldert H. Piersma, Anna Bal-Price, Andrea Seiler, Remco H. Westerink, Bastian Zimmer, Pamela J. Lein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a paucity of information concerning the developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) hazard posed by industrial and environmental chemicals. New testing approaches will most likely be based on batteries of alternative and complementary (non-Animal) tests. As DNT is assumed to result from the modulation of fundamental neurodevelopmental processes (such as neuronal differentiation, precursor cell migration or neuronal network formation) by chemicals, the first generation of alternative DNT tests target these processes. The advantage of such types of assays is that they capture toxicants with multiple targets and modes-of-Action. Moreover, the processes modelled by the assays can be linked to toxicity endophenotypes, i.e., alterations in neural connectivity that form the basis for neurofunctional deficits in man. The authors of this review convened in a workshop to define criteria for the selection of positive/negative controls, to prepare recommendations on their use, and to initiate the setup of a directory of reference chemicals. For initial technical optimization of tests, a set of > 50 endpoint-specific control compounds was identified. For further test development, an additional "test" set of 33 chemicals considered to act directly as bona fide DNT toxicants is proposed, and each chemical is annotated to the extent it fulfills these criteria. A tabular compilation of the original literature used to select the test set chemicals provides information on statistical procedures, and toxic/non-Toxic doses (both for pups and dams). Suggestions are provided on how to use the > 100 compounds (including negative controls) compiled here to address specificity, adversity and use of alternative test systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-74
Number of pages26
JournalAltex
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Endophenotypes
Directories
Poisons
Patient Selection
Cell Movement
Education

Keywords

  • AOP
  • Neurotoxicity
  • Specificity
  • Test development
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Pharmacology
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals : Example lists & criteria for their selection & use. / Aschner, Michael; Ceccatelli, Sandra; Daneshian, Mardas; Fritsche, Ellen; Hasiwa, Nina; Hartung, Thomas; Hogberg, Helena T.; Leist, Marcel; Li, Abby; Mundy, William R.; Padilla, Stephanie; Piersma, Aldert H.; Bal-Price, Anna; Seiler, Andrea; Westerink, Remco H.; Zimmer, Bastian; Lein, Pamela J.

In: Altex, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2017, p. 49-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Aschner, M, Ceccatelli, S, Daneshian, M, Fritsche, E, Hasiwa, N, Hartung, T, Hogberg, HT, Leist, M, Li, A, Mundy, WR, Padilla, S, Piersma, AH, Bal-Price, A, Seiler, A, Westerink, RH, Zimmer, B & Lein, PJ 2017, 'Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals: Example lists & criteria for their selection & use', Altex, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 49-74. https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1604201
Aschner, Michael ; Ceccatelli, Sandra ; Daneshian, Mardas ; Fritsche, Ellen ; Hasiwa, Nina ; Hartung, Thomas ; Hogberg, Helena T. ; Leist, Marcel ; Li, Abby ; Mundy, William R. ; Padilla, Stephanie ; Piersma, Aldert H. ; Bal-Price, Anna ; Seiler, Andrea ; Westerink, Remco H. ; Zimmer, Bastian ; Lein, Pamela J. / Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals : Example lists & criteria for their selection & use. In: Altex. 2017 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 49-74.
@article{769153263e6e40218f909a33dff22335,
title = "Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals: Example lists & criteria for their selection & use",
abstract = "There is a paucity of information concerning the developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) hazard posed by industrial and environmental chemicals. New testing approaches will most likely be based on batteries of alternative and complementary (non-Animal) tests. As DNT is assumed to result from the modulation of fundamental neurodevelopmental processes (such as neuronal differentiation, precursor cell migration or neuronal network formation) by chemicals, the first generation of alternative DNT tests target these processes. The advantage of such types of assays is that they capture toxicants with multiple targets and modes-of-Action. Moreover, the processes modelled by the assays can be linked to toxicity endophenotypes, i.e., alterations in neural connectivity that form the basis for neurofunctional deficits in man. The authors of this review convened in a workshop to define criteria for the selection of positive/negative controls, to prepare recommendations on their use, and to initiate the setup of a directory of reference chemicals. For initial technical optimization of tests, a set of > 50 endpoint-specific control compounds was identified. For further test development, an additional {"}test{"} set of 33 chemicals considered to act directly as bona fide DNT toxicants is proposed, and each chemical is annotated to the extent it fulfills these criteria. A tabular compilation of the original literature used to select the test set chemicals provides information on statistical procedures, and toxic/non-Toxic doses (both for pups and dams). Suggestions are provided on how to use the > 100 compounds (including negative controls) compiled here to address specificity, adversity and use of alternative test systems.",
keywords = "AOP, Neurotoxicity, Specificity, Test development, Validation",
author = "Michael Aschner and Sandra Ceccatelli and Mardas Daneshian and Ellen Fritsche and Nina Hasiwa and Thomas Hartung and Hogberg, {Helena T.} and Marcel Leist and Abby Li and Mundy, {William R.} and Stephanie Padilla and Piersma, {Aldert H.} and Anna Bal-Price and Andrea Seiler and Westerink, {Remco H.} and Bastian Zimmer and Lein, {Pamela J.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.14573/altex.1604201",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "49--74",
journal = "Altex",
issn = "1868-596X",
publisher = "Elsevier GmbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reference compounds for alternative test methods to indicate developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) potential of chemicals

T2 - Example lists & criteria for their selection & use

AU - Aschner, Michael

AU - Ceccatelli, Sandra

AU - Daneshian, Mardas

AU - Fritsche, Ellen

AU - Hasiwa, Nina

AU - Hartung, Thomas

AU - Hogberg, Helena T.

AU - Leist, Marcel

AU - Li, Abby

AU - Mundy, William R.

AU - Padilla, Stephanie

AU - Piersma, Aldert H.

AU - Bal-Price, Anna

AU - Seiler, Andrea

AU - Westerink, Remco H.

AU - Zimmer, Bastian

AU - Lein, Pamela J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - There is a paucity of information concerning the developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) hazard posed by industrial and environmental chemicals. New testing approaches will most likely be based on batteries of alternative and complementary (non-Animal) tests. As DNT is assumed to result from the modulation of fundamental neurodevelopmental processes (such as neuronal differentiation, precursor cell migration or neuronal network formation) by chemicals, the first generation of alternative DNT tests target these processes. The advantage of such types of assays is that they capture toxicants with multiple targets and modes-of-Action. Moreover, the processes modelled by the assays can be linked to toxicity endophenotypes, i.e., alterations in neural connectivity that form the basis for neurofunctional deficits in man. The authors of this review convened in a workshop to define criteria for the selection of positive/negative controls, to prepare recommendations on their use, and to initiate the setup of a directory of reference chemicals. For initial technical optimization of tests, a set of > 50 endpoint-specific control compounds was identified. For further test development, an additional "test" set of 33 chemicals considered to act directly as bona fide DNT toxicants is proposed, and each chemical is annotated to the extent it fulfills these criteria. A tabular compilation of the original literature used to select the test set chemicals provides information on statistical procedures, and toxic/non-Toxic doses (both for pups and dams). Suggestions are provided on how to use the > 100 compounds (including negative controls) compiled here to address specificity, adversity and use of alternative test systems.

AB - There is a paucity of information concerning the developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) hazard posed by industrial and environmental chemicals. New testing approaches will most likely be based on batteries of alternative and complementary (non-Animal) tests. As DNT is assumed to result from the modulation of fundamental neurodevelopmental processes (such as neuronal differentiation, precursor cell migration or neuronal network formation) by chemicals, the first generation of alternative DNT tests target these processes. The advantage of such types of assays is that they capture toxicants with multiple targets and modes-of-Action. Moreover, the processes modelled by the assays can be linked to toxicity endophenotypes, i.e., alterations in neural connectivity that form the basis for neurofunctional deficits in man. The authors of this review convened in a workshop to define criteria for the selection of positive/negative controls, to prepare recommendations on their use, and to initiate the setup of a directory of reference chemicals. For initial technical optimization of tests, a set of > 50 endpoint-specific control compounds was identified. For further test development, an additional "test" set of 33 chemicals considered to act directly as bona fide DNT toxicants is proposed, and each chemical is annotated to the extent it fulfills these criteria. A tabular compilation of the original literature used to select the test set chemicals provides information on statistical procedures, and toxic/non-Toxic doses (both for pups and dams). Suggestions are provided on how to use the > 100 compounds (including negative controls) compiled here to address specificity, adversity and use of alternative test systems.

KW - AOP

KW - Neurotoxicity

KW - Specificity

KW - Test development

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011999800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011999800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14573/altex.1604201

DO - 10.14573/altex.1604201

M3 - Article

C2 - 27452664

AN - SCOPUS:85011999800

VL - 34

SP - 49

EP - 74

JO - Altex

JF - Altex

SN - 1868-596X

IS - 1

ER -