Proneural enhancement by Notch overcomes suppressor-of-hairless repressor function in the developing Drosophila eye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The receptor protein Notch plays a conserved role in restricting neural-fate specification during lateral inhibition. Lateral inhibition requires the Notch intracellular domain to coactivate Su(H)-mediated transcription of the Enhancer-of-split Complex. During Drosophila eye development, Notch plays an additional role in promoting neural fate independently of Su(H) and E(spl)-C, and this finding suggests an alternative mechanism of Notch signal transduction. Results: We used genetic mosaics to analyze the proneural enhancement pathway. As in lateral inhibition, the metalloprotease Kuzbanian, the EGF repeat 12 region of the Notch extracellular domain, Presenilin, and the Notch intracellular domain were required. By contrast, proneural enhancement became constitutive in the absence of Su(H), and this led to premature differentiation and upregulation of the Atonal and Senseless proteins. Ectopic Notch signaling by Delta expression ahead of the morphogenetic furrow also caused premature differentiation. Conclusions: Proneural enhancement and lateral inhibition use similar ligand binding and receptor processing but differ in the nuclear role of Su(H). Prior to Notch signaling, Su(H) represses neural development directly, not indirectly through E(spl)-C. During proneural enhancement, the Notch intracellular domain overcomes the repression of neural differentiation. Later, lateral inhibition restores the repression of neural development by a different mechanism, requiring E(spl)-C transcription. Thus, Notch restricts neurogenesis temporally to a narrow time interval between two modes of repression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)330-338
Number of pages9
JournalCurrent Biology
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 6 2001

Fingerprint

Notch Receptors
neurodevelopment
Transcription
Drosophila
transcription (genetics)
eyes
Presenilins
Signal transduction
receptors
neurogenesis
Neurogenesis
Metalloproteases
metalloproteinases
furrows
Epidermal Growth Factor
signal transduction
Signal Transduction
Up-Regulation
proteins
Ligands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Proneural enhancement by Notch overcomes suppressor-of-hairless repressor function in the developing Drosophila eye. / Li, Yanxia; Baker, Nicholas E.

In: Current Biology, Vol. 11, No. 5, 06.03.2001, p. 330-338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f1a5ef8003ab467cbde094ad985793d8,
title = "Proneural enhancement by Notch overcomes suppressor-of-hairless repressor function in the developing Drosophila eye",
abstract = "Background: The receptor protein Notch plays a conserved role in restricting neural-fate specification during lateral inhibition. Lateral inhibition requires the Notch intracellular domain to coactivate Su(H)-mediated transcription of the Enhancer-of-split Complex. During Drosophila eye development, Notch plays an additional role in promoting neural fate independently of Su(H) and E(spl)-C, and this finding suggests an alternative mechanism of Notch signal transduction. Results: We used genetic mosaics to analyze the proneural enhancement pathway. As in lateral inhibition, the metalloprotease Kuzbanian, the EGF repeat 12 region of the Notch extracellular domain, Presenilin, and the Notch intracellular domain were required. By contrast, proneural enhancement became constitutive in the absence of Su(H), and this led to premature differentiation and upregulation of the Atonal and Senseless proteins. Ectopic Notch signaling by Delta expression ahead of the morphogenetic furrow also caused premature differentiation. Conclusions: Proneural enhancement and lateral inhibition use similar ligand binding and receptor processing but differ in the nuclear role of Su(H). Prior to Notch signaling, Su(H) represses neural development directly, not indirectly through E(spl)-C. During proneural enhancement, the Notch intracellular domain overcomes the repression of neural differentiation. Later, lateral inhibition restores the repression of neural development by a different mechanism, requiring E(spl)-C transcription. Thus, Notch restricts neurogenesis temporally to a narrow time interval between two modes of repression.",
author = "Yanxia Li and Baker, {Nicholas E.}",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00093-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "330--338",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proneural enhancement by Notch overcomes suppressor-of-hairless repressor function in the developing Drosophila eye

AU - Li, Yanxia

AU - Baker, Nicholas E.

PY - 2001/3/6

Y1 - 2001/3/6

N2 - Background: The receptor protein Notch plays a conserved role in restricting neural-fate specification during lateral inhibition. Lateral inhibition requires the Notch intracellular domain to coactivate Su(H)-mediated transcription of the Enhancer-of-split Complex. During Drosophila eye development, Notch plays an additional role in promoting neural fate independently of Su(H) and E(spl)-C, and this finding suggests an alternative mechanism of Notch signal transduction. Results: We used genetic mosaics to analyze the proneural enhancement pathway. As in lateral inhibition, the metalloprotease Kuzbanian, the EGF repeat 12 region of the Notch extracellular domain, Presenilin, and the Notch intracellular domain were required. By contrast, proneural enhancement became constitutive in the absence of Su(H), and this led to premature differentiation and upregulation of the Atonal and Senseless proteins. Ectopic Notch signaling by Delta expression ahead of the morphogenetic furrow also caused premature differentiation. Conclusions: Proneural enhancement and lateral inhibition use similar ligand binding and receptor processing but differ in the nuclear role of Su(H). Prior to Notch signaling, Su(H) represses neural development directly, not indirectly through E(spl)-C. During proneural enhancement, the Notch intracellular domain overcomes the repression of neural differentiation. Later, lateral inhibition restores the repression of neural development by a different mechanism, requiring E(spl)-C transcription. Thus, Notch restricts neurogenesis temporally to a narrow time interval between two modes of repression.

AB - Background: The receptor protein Notch plays a conserved role in restricting neural-fate specification during lateral inhibition. Lateral inhibition requires the Notch intracellular domain to coactivate Su(H)-mediated transcription of the Enhancer-of-split Complex. During Drosophila eye development, Notch plays an additional role in promoting neural fate independently of Su(H) and E(spl)-C, and this finding suggests an alternative mechanism of Notch signal transduction. Results: We used genetic mosaics to analyze the proneural enhancement pathway. As in lateral inhibition, the metalloprotease Kuzbanian, the EGF repeat 12 region of the Notch extracellular domain, Presenilin, and the Notch intracellular domain were required. By contrast, proneural enhancement became constitutive in the absence of Su(H), and this led to premature differentiation and upregulation of the Atonal and Senseless proteins. Ectopic Notch signaling by Delta expression ahead of the morphogenetic furrow also caused premature differentiation. Conclusions: Proneural enhancement and lateral inhibition use similar ligand binding and receptor processing but differ in the nuclear role of Su(H). Prior to Notch signaling, Su(H) represses neural development directly, not indirectly through E(spl)-C. During proneural enhancement, the Notch intracellular domain overcomes the repression of neural differentiation. Later, lateral inhibition restores the repression of neural development by a different mechanism, requiring E(spl)-C transcription. Thus, Notch restricts neurogenesis temporally to a narrow time interval between two modes of repression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035814909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035814909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00093-8

DO - 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00093-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 11267869

AN - SCOPUS:0035814909

VL - 11

SP - 330

EP - 338

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 5

ER -