Preparing Houston: Lessons Learned, Future Directions

Mohammad Madjid, Parsa Mirhaji, Scott Lillibridge, Ward Casscells

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

On September 11, 2001, Al Qaeda terrorists committed a savage act against humanity when they used domestic jetliners to crash into buildings in New York City and Washington, DC, killing thousands of people. In October 2001, coming on the heels of this savagery was another act of barbarity, this time using anthrax, not jetliners, to take innocent lives. Each incident demonstrates the vulnerability of an open society, and Americans are left to wonder how such acts can be prevented. Now, Al Qaeda operatives are reportedly regrouping, recruiting, and changing their tactics to distribute money and messages to operatives around the world. Many experts believe that terrorist attacks are inevitable. No city is immune from attack, and no city is fully prepared to handle the residual impact of a potentially ravaging biological or chemical attack. A survey conducted by the Cable News Network (CNN) in January 2002, studied 30 major US cities, ranking them based on 6 statistical indices of vulnerability. Thirteen cities were deemed better prepared than Houston, 10 were in a similar state of preparedness, and only 6 were less prepared than Houston. Here, we discuss the measures which have taken place in Houston to make it a safer place and which plans are needed for future. Houston experience can be used as a model to develop similar plans for other cities nation-wide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
EditorsE.M. Carapezza
Pages139-145
Number of pages7
Volume5071
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes
EventSensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C31) Technologies for Homeland Defense and Law Enforcement II - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: Apr 21 2003Apr 25 2003

Other

OtherSensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C31) Technologies for Homeland Defense and Law Enforcement II
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period4/21/034/25/03

Fingerprint

Houston (TX)
Chemical attack
lessons learned
Cables
attack
vulnerability
chemical attack
tactics
crashes
news
ranking
messages
cables

Keywords

  • Biosecurity
  • Disaster Preparedness
  • Houston
  • Mass Casualty Events
  • Terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Madjid, M., Mirhaji, P., Lillibridge, S., & Casscells, W. (2003). Preparing Houston: Lessons Learned, Future Directions. In E. M. Carapezza (Ed.), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (Vol. 5071, pp. 139-145) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.517220

Preparing Houston : Lessons Learned, Future Directions. / Madjid, Mohammad; Mirhaji, Parsa; Lillibridge, Scott; Casscells, Ward.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. ed. / E.M. Carapezza. Vol. 5071 2003. p. 139-145.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Madjid, M, Mirhaji, P, Lillibridge, S & Casscells, W 2003, Preparing Houston: Lessons Learned, Future Directions. in EM Carapezza (ed.), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. vol. 5071, pp. 139-145, Sensors, and Command, Control, Communications, and Intelligence (C31) Technologies for Homeland Defense and Law Enforcement II, Orlando, FL, United States, 4/21/03. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.517220
Madjid M, Mirhaji P, Lillibridge S, Casscells W. Preparing Houston: Lessons Learned, Future Directions. In Carapezza EM, editor, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 5071. 2003. p. 139-145 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.517220
Madjid, Mohammad ; Mirhaji, Parsa ; Lillibridge, Scott ; Casscells, Ward. / Preparing Houston : Lessons Learned, Future Directions. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. editor / E.M. Carapezza. Vol. 5071 2003. pp. 139-145
@inproceedings{3dbfb37863614232a8e7f7e52c17e160,
title = "Preparing Houston: Lessons Learned, Future Directions",
abstract = "On September 11, 2001, Al Qaeda terrorists committed a savage act against humanity when they used domestic jetliners to crash into buildings in New York City and Washington, DC, killing thousands of people. In October 2001, coming on the heels of this savagery was another act of barbarity, this time using anthrax, not jetliners, to take innocent lives. Each incident demonstrates the vulnerability of an open society, and Americans are left to wonder how such acts can be prevented. Now, Al Qaeda operatives are reportedly regrouping, recruiting, and changing their tactics to distribute money and messages to operatives around the world. Many experts believe that terrorist attacks are inevitable. No city is immune from attack, and no city is fully prepared to handle the residual impact of a potentially ravaging biological or chemical attack. A survey conducted by the Cable News Network (CNN) in January 2002, studied 30 major US cities, ranking them based on 6 statistical indices of vulnerability. Thirteen cities were deemed better prepared than Houston, 10 were in a similar state of preparedness, and only 6 were less prepared than Houston. Here, we discuss the measures which have taken place in Houston to make it a safer place and which plans are needed for future. Houston experience can be used as a model to develop similar plans for other cities nation-wide.",
keywords = "Biosecurity, Disaster Preparedness, Houston, Mass Casualty Events, Terrorism",
author = "Mohammad Madjid and Parsa Mirhaji and Scott Lillibridge and Ward Casscells",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1117/12.517220",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5071",
pages = "139--145",
editor = "E.M. Carapezza",
booktitle = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Preparing Houston

T2 - Lessons Learned, Future Directions

AU - Madjid, Mohammad

AU - Mirhaji, Parsa

AU - Lillibridge, Scott

AU - Casscells, Ward

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - On September 11, 2001, Al Qaeda terrorists committed a savage act against humanity when they used domestic jetliners to crash into buildings in New York City and Washington, DC, killing thousands of people. In October 2001, coming on the heels of this savagery was another act of barbarity, this time using anthrax, not jetliners, to take innocent lives. Each incident demonstrates the vulnerability of an open society, and Americans are left to wonder how such acts can be prevented. Now, Al Qaeda operatives are reportedly regrouping, recruiting, and changing their tactics to distribute money and messages to operatives around the world. Many experts believe that terrorist attacks are inevitable. No city is immune from attack, and no city is fully prepared to handle the residual impact of a potentially ravaging biological or chemical attack. A survey conducted by the Cable News Network (CNN) in January 2002, studied 30 major US cities, ranking them based on 6 statistical indices of vulnerability. Thirteen cities were deemed better prepared than Houston, 10 were in a similar state of preparedness, and only 6 were less prepared than Houston. Here, we discuss the measures which have taken place in Houston to make it a safer place and which plans are needed for future. Houston experience can be used as a model to develop similar plans for other cities nation-wide.

AB - On September 11, 2001, Al Qaeda terrorists committed a savage act against humanity when they used domestic jetliners to crash into buildings in New York City and Washington, DC, killing thousands of people. In October 2001, coming on the heels of this savagery was another act of barbarity, this time using anthrax, not jetliners, to take innocent lives. Each incident demonstrates the vulnerability of an open society, and Americans are left to wonder how such acts can be prevented. Now, Al Qaeda operatives are reportedly regrouping, recruiting, and changing their tactics to distribute money and messages to operatives around the world. Many experts believe that terrorist attacks are inevitable. No city is immune from attack, and no city is fully prepared to handle the residual impact of a potentially ravaging biological or chemical attack. A survey conducted by the Cable News Network (CNN) in January 2002, studied 30 major US cities, ranking them based on 6 statistical indices of vulnerability. Thirteen cities were deemed better prepared than Houston, 10 were in a similar state of preparedness, and only 6 were less prepared than Houston. Here, we discuss the measures which have taken place in Houston to make it a safer place and which plans are needed for future. Houston experience can be used as a model to develop similar plans for other cities nation-wide.

KW - Biosecurity

KW - Disaster Preparedness

KW - Houston

KW - Mass Casualty Events

KW - Terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642556902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642556902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.517220

DO - 10.1117/12.517220

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:1642556902

VL - 5071

SP - 139

EP - 145

BT - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

A2 - Carapezza, E.M.

ER -