Preparedness of Ob/Gyn residents for fellowship training in gynecologic oncology

David W. Doo, Matthew Powell, Akiva Novetsky, Jeanelle Sheeder, Saketh R. Guntupalli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Residency training in obstetrics and gynecology is being challenged by increasingly stringent regulations and decreased operative experience. We sought to determine the perception of preparedness of incoming gynecologic oncology fellows for advanced surgical training in gynecologic oncology. An online survey was sent to gynecologic oncologists involved in fellowship training in the United States. They were asked to evaluate their most recent incoming clinical fellows in the domains of professionalism, level of independence/graduated responsibility, psychomotor ability, clinical evaluation and management, and academia and scholarship using a standard Likert-style scale. The response rate among attending physicians was 40% (n = 105/260) and 61% (n = 28/46) for program directors. Of those who participated, 49% reported that their incoming fellows could not independently perform a hysterectomy, 59% reported that they could not independently perform 30 min of a major procedure, 40% reported that they could not control bleeding, 40% reported that they could not recognize anatomy and tissue planes, and 58% reported that they could not dissect tissue planes. Fellows lacked an understanding of pathophysiology, treatment recommendations, and the ability to identify and treat critically ill patients. In the academic domain, respondents agreed that fellows were deficient in the areas of protocol design (54%), statistical analysis (54%), and manuscript writing (65%). These results suggest that general Ob/Gyn residency is ineffective in preparing fellows for advanced training in gynecologic oncology and should prompt a revision of the goals and objectives of resident education to correct these deficiencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-60
Number of pages6
JournalGynecologic Oncology Case Reports
Volume12
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Internship and Residency
Manuscripts
Hysterectomy
Gynecology
Critical Illness
Obstetrics
Anatomy
Hemorrhage
Physicians
Education
Surveys and Questionnaires
Therapeutics
Oncologists
Professionalism

Keywords

  • Electronic survey
  • Fellowship training
  • Gynecologic oncology
  • Residency training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Preparedness of Ob/Gyn residents for fellowship training in gynecologic oncology. / Doo, David W.; Powell, Matthew; Novetsky, Akiva; Sheeder, Jeanelle; Guntupalli, Saketh R.

In: Gynecologic Oncology Case Reports, Vol. 12, 01.04.2015, p. 55-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Doo, David W. ; Powell, Matthew ; Novetsky, Akiva ; Sheeder, Jeanelle ; Guntupalli, Saketh R. / Preparedness of Ob/Gyn residents for fellowship training in gynecologic oncology. In: Gynecologic Oncology Case Reports. 2015 ; Vol. 12. pp. 55-60.
@article{46bd5db764584510861829a476a9b0a3,
title = "Preparedness of Ob/Gyn residents for fellowship training in gynecologic oncology",
abstract = "Residency training in obstetrics and gynecology is being challenged by increasingly stringent regulations and decreased operative experience. We sought to determine the perception of preparedness of incoming gynecologic oncology fellows for advanced surgical training in gynecologic oncology. An online survey was sent to gynecologic oncologists involved in fellowship training in the United States. They were asked to evaluate their most recent incoming clinical fellows in the domains of professionalism, level of independence/graduated responsibility, psychomotor ability, clinical evaluation and management, and academia and scholarship using a standard Likert-style scale. The response rate among attending physicians was 40{\%} (n = 105/260) and 61{\%} (n = 28/46) for program directors. Of those who participated, 49{\%} reported that their incoming fellows could not independently perform a hysterectomy, 59{\%} reported that they could not independently perform 30 min of a major procedure, 40{\%} reported that they could not control bleeding, 40{\%} reported that they could not recognize anatomy and tissue planes, and 58{\%} reported that they could not dissect tissue planes. Fellows lacked an understanding of pathophysiology, treatment recommendations, and the ability to identify and treat critically ill patients. In the academic domain, respondents agreed that fellows were deficient in the areas of protocol design (54{\%}), statistical analysis (54{\%}), and manuscript writing (65{\%}). These results suggest that general Ob/Gyn residency is ineffective in preparing fellows for advanced training in gynecologic oncology and should prompt a revision of the goals and objectives of resident education to correct these deficiencies.",
keywords = "Electronic survey, Fellowship training, Gynecologic oncology, Residency training",
author = "Doo, {David W.} and Matthew Powell and Akiva Novetsky and Jeanelle Sheeder and Guntupalli, {Saketh R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gore.2015.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "55--60",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology Case Reports",
issn = "2211-338X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preparedness of Ob/Gyn residents for fellowship training in gynecologic oncology

AU - Doo, David W.

AU - Powell, Matthew

AU - Novetsky, Akiva

AU - Sheeder, Jeanelle

AU - Guntupalli, Saketh R.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Residency training in obstetrics and gynecology is being challenged by increasingly stringent regulations and decreased operative experience. We sought to determine the perception of preparedness of incoming gynecologic oncology fellows for advanced surgical training in gynecologic oncology. An online survey was sent to gynecologic oncologists involved in fellowship training in the United States. They were asked to evaluate their most recent incoming clinical fellows in the domains of professionalism, level of independence/graduated responsibility, psychomotor ability, clinical evaluation and management, and academia and scholarship using a standard Likert-style scale. The response rate among attending physicians was 40% (n = 105/260) and 61% (n = 28/46) for program directors. Of those who participated, 49% reported that their incoming fellows could not independently perform a hysterectomy, 59% reported that they could not independently perform 30 min of a major procedure, 40% reported that they could not control bleeding, 40% reported that they could not recognize anatomy and tissue planes, and 58% reported that they could not dissect tissue planes. Fellows lacked an understanding of pathophysiology, treatment recommendations, and the ability to identify and treat critically ill patients. In the academic domain, respondents agreed that fellows were deficient in the areas of protocol design (54%), statistical analysis (54%), and manuscript writing (65%). These results suggest that general Ob/Gyn residency is ineffective in preparing fellows for advanced training in gynecologic oncology and should prompt a revision of the goals and objectives of resident education to correct these deficiencies.

AB - Residency training in obstetrics and gynecology is being challenged by increasingly stringent regulations and decreased operative experience. We sought to determine the perception of preparedness of incoming gynecologic oncology fellows for advanced surgical training in gynecologic oncology. An online survey was sent to gynecologic oncologists involved in fellowship training in the United States. They were asked to evaluate their most recent incoming clinical fellows in the domains of professionalism, level of independence/graduated responsibility, psychomotor ability, clinical evaluation and management, and academia and scholarship using a standard Likert-style scale. The response rate among attending physicians was 40% (n = 105/260) and 61% (n = 28/46) for program directors. Of those who participated, 49% reported that their incoming fellows could not independently perform a hysterectomy, 59% reported that they could not independently perform 30 min of a major procedure, 40% reported that they could not control bleeding, 40% reported that they could not recognize anatomy and tissue planes, and 58% reported that they could not dissect tissue planes. Fellows lacked an understanding of pathophysiology, treatment recommendations, and the ability to identify and treat critically ill patients. In the academic domain, respondents agreed that fellows were deficient in the areas of protocol design (54%), statistical analysis (54%), and manuscript writing (65%). These results suggest that general Ob/Gyn residency is ineffective in preparing fellows for advanced training in gynecologic oncology and should prompt a revision of the goals and objectives of resident education to correct these deficiencies.

KW - Electronic survey

KW - Fellowship training

KW - Gynecologic oncology

KW - Residency training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964845057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964845057&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gore.2015.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.gore.2015.03.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964845057

VL - 12

SP - 55

EP - 60

JO - Gynecologic Oncology Case Reports

JF - Gynecologic Oncology Case Reports

SN - 2211-338X

ER -