Preformed donor-specific antibodies and risk of antibody-mediated rejection in repeat renal transplantation

Demetra S. Tsapepas, Rodica Vasilescu, Bekir Tanriover, Yael Coppleson, Yelena Rekhtman, Mark A. Hardy, Geoffrey Dube, R. John Crew, Lloyd E. Ratner, David J. Cohen, Sumit Mohan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allograft outcomes in patients undergoing repeat renal transplantation are inferior compared to first-time transplant recipient outcomes. Donor-specific antibodies detected by solid-phase assays (DSA-SPA) may contribute to the worse prognosis. The influence of DSA-SPA on repeat renal transplantation outcomes has not been previously studied in detail. DESIGN: This study reports the findings in 174 patients who underwent repeat renal transplantation between years 2007 and 2012. These included 62 patients with preformed DSA-SPA detected by Luminex at the time of transplantation. Patients received standard and consistent immunosuppression and were monitored closely for evidence of rejection. Recipients who underwent desensitization were excluded from this analysis. Endpoints included development of biopsy-proven acute rejection and analysis of graft survival and function. RESULTS: Patients in the DSA-SPA-positive and DSA-SPA-negative groups received similar immunosuppression, and a similar proportion of recipients had a peak panel reactive antibody greater than 20%; the two groups differed with respect to human leukocyte antigen mismatches (4.7±1.1 vs. 4.1±1.7, P=0.024). Recipients with preformed DSA-SPA had higher rejection rates (54.8% vs. 34.8%, P=0.01), including higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (32.3% vs. 7.1%, P<0.001). Recipients who were DSA-SPA-positive and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM)-positive had a higher incidence of both AMR (OR 4.6, P=0.009) and of acute rejection (OR 3.57, P=0.02) as compared to those who were DSA-SPA-positive and FCXM-negative. Overall allograft survival was similar in the DSA-SPA-positive and DSA-SPA-negative groups (log-rank test=0.63, P=0.428). Differences in allograft function were detectable after 2 years (32.8±13.1 vs. 47±20.2 mL/min/1.73 m, P=0.023) and may be reflective of more AMR among DSA-SPA-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that DSA-SPA increases the overall risk of acute rejection but does not appear to adversely impact allograft survival during the early follow-up period. Close monitoring of renal function and early biopsy for AMR detection appear to allow for satisfactory short-term allograft outcomes in repeat transplant recipients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)642-647
Number of pages6
JournalTransplantation
Volume97
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 27 2014

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Donor-specific antibodies
  • Graft survival
  • Kidney transplantation
  • Outcomes
  • Rejection rates
  • Repeat transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Tsapepas, D. S., Vasilescu, R., Tanriover, B., Coppleson, Y., Rekhtman, Y., Hardy, M. A., ... Mohan, S. (2014). Preformed donor-specific antibodies and risk of antibody-mediated rejection in repeat renal transplantation. Transplantation, 97(6), 642-647. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TP.0000440954.14510.6a