Predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping following brief motivational interviewing among patients with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis

Michael V. Pantalon, Mary K. Murphy, Declan T. Barry, Meaghan Lavery, Arthur John Swanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Non-adherence to psychiatric and substance abuse treatment recommendations, especially with regard to aftercare outpatient appointment-keeping following hospitalizations, exacts a high cost on mental health spending and prevents patients from receiving therapeutic doses of treatment. Our primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between potential predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping among a group of adult patients immediately following hospitalization for severe psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis. Methods: Candidate predictors and moderator variables included demographics, psychiatric status, psychiatric symptom severity, and inpatient group adherence, while aftercare appointment-keeping was defined as attendance at the first aftercare appointment. Participants were 121 adult inpatients with a psychiatric disorder or dual diagnosis originally enrolled in an earlier randomized controlled trial comparing standard treatment with standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing for increasing adherence. Results: Results indicated that, across treatment conditions, those who were female, did not have dual diagnosis, were older (older than 33 years), and were less educated (high school) attended their first aftercare appointment at significantly higher rates than their counterparts. A treatment-by-gender interaction was noted, where only men were significantly more likely to keep their first aftercare appointment if they received standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing, compared to standard treatment alone (OR = 9.58, p < .001). Conclusions: Findings suggest that gender, dual diagnosis status, age and education may be an important predictors of aftercare treatment adherence and that gender may be a moderator of motivational interviewing among individuals with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-51
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Dual Diagnosis
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Dual (Psychiatry) Diagnosis
Motivational Interviewing
Aftercare
Mental Disorders
Appointments and Schedules
Psychiatry
Therapeutics
Inpatients
Hospitalization
Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers
Substance-Related Disorders
Mental Health
Outpatients
Randomized Controlled Trials
Demography

Keywords

  • Adherence-enhancement intervention
  • Gender differences
  • Motivational interviewing
  • Treatment adherence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping following brief motivational interviewing among patients with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis. / Pantalon, Michael V.; Murphy, Mary K.; Barry, Declan T.; Lavery, Meaghan; Swanson, Arthur John.

In: Journal of Dual Diagnosis, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2014, p. 44-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c9a1a770da1140cda43c9ef4aa965883,
title = "Predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping following brief motivational interviewing among patients with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis",
abstract = "Objective: Non-adherence to psychiatric and substance abuse treatment recommendations, especially with regard to aftercare outpatient appointment-keeping following hospitalizations, exacts a high cost on mental health spending and prevents patients from receiving therapeutic doses of treatment. Our primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between potential predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping among a group of adult patients immediately following hospitalization for severe psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis. Methods: Candidate predictors and moderator variables included demographics, psychiatric status, psychiatric symptom severity, and inpatient group adherence, while aftercare appointment-keeping was defined as attendance at the first aftercare appointment. Participants were 121 adult inpatients with a psychiatric disorder or dual diagnosis originally enrolled in an earlier randomized controlled trial comparing standard treatment with standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing for increasing adherence. Results: Results indicated that, across treatment conditions, those who were female, did not have dual diagnosis, were older (older than 33 years), and were less educated (high school) attended their first aftercare appointment at significantly higher rates than their counterparts. A treatment-by-gender interaction was noted, where only men were significantly more likely to keep their first aftercare appointment if they received standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing, compared to standard treatment alone (OR = 9.58, p < .001). Conclusions: Findings suggest that gender, dual diagnosis status, age and education may be an important predictors of aftercare treatment adherence and that gender may be a moderator of motivational interviewing among individuals with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis.",
keywords = "Adherence-enhancement intervention, Gender differences, Motivational interviewing, Treatment adherence",
author = "Pantalon, {Michael V.} and Murphy, {Mary K.} and Barry, {Declan T.} and Meaghan Lavery and Swanson, {Arthur John}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/15504263.2013.867785",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "44--51",
journal = "Journal of Dual Diagnosis",
issn = "1550-4263",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping following brief motivational interviewing among patients with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis

AU - Pantalon, Michael V.

AU - Murphy, Mary K.

AU - Barry, Declan T.

AU - Lavery, Meaghan

AU - Swanson, Arthur John

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective: Non-adherence to psychiatric and substance abuse treatment recommendations, especially with regard to aftercare outpatient appointment-keeping following hospitalizations, exacts a high cost on mental health spending and prevents patients from receiving therapeutic doses of treatment. Our primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between potential predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping among a group of adult patients immediately following hospitalization for severe psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis. Methods: Candidate predictors and moderator variables included demographics, psychiatric status, psychiatric symptom severity, and inpatient group adherence, while aftercare appointment-keeping was defined as attendance at the first aftercare appointment. Participants were 121 adult inpatients with a psychiatric disorder or dual diagnosis originally enrolled in an earlier randomized controlled trial comparing standard treatment with standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing for increasing adherence. Results: Results indicated that, across treatment conditions, those who were female, did not have dual diagnosis, were older (older than 33 years), and were less educated (high school) attended their first aftercare appointment at significantly higher rates than their counterparts. A treatment-by-gender interaction was noted, where only men were significantly more likely to keep their first aftercare appointment if they received standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing, compared to standard treatment alone (OR = 9.58, p < .001). Conclusions: Findings suggest that gender, dual diagnosis status, age and education may be an important predictors of aftercare treatment adherence and that gender may be a moderator of motivational interviewing among individuals with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis.

AB - Objective: Non-adherence to psychiatric and substance abuse treatment recommendations, especially with regard to aftercare outpatient appointment-keeping following hospitalizations, exacts a high cost on mental health spending and prevents patients from receiving therapeutic doses of treatment. Our primary objective was to evaluate the relationship between potential predictors and moderators of aftercare appointment-keeping among a group of adult patients immediately following hospitalization for severe psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis. Methods: Candidate predictors and moderator variables included demographics, psychiatric status, psychiatric symptom severity, and inpatient group adherence, while aftercare appointment-keeping was defined as attendance at the first aftercare appointment. Participants were 121 adult inpatients with a psychiatric disorder or dual diagnosis originally enrolled in an earlier randomized controlled trial comparing standard treatment with standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing for increasing adherence. Results: Results indicated that, across treatment conditions, those who were female, did not have dual diagnosis, were older (older than 33 years), and were less educated (high school) attended their first aftercare appointment at significantly higher rates than their counterparts. A treatment-by-gender interaction was noted, where only men were significantly more likely to keep their first aftercare appointment if they received standard treatment plus brief motivational interviewing, compared to standard treatment alone (OR = 9.58, p < .001). Conclusions: Findings suggest that gender, dual diagnosis status, age and education may be an important predictors of aftercare treatment adherence and that gender may be a moderator of motivational interviewing among individuals with psychiatric disorders or dual diagnosis.

KW - Adherence-enhancement intervention

KW - Gender differences

KW - Motivational interviewing

KW - Treatment adherence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898491245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898491245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15504263.2013.867785

DO - 10.1080/15504263.2013.867785

M3 - Article

C2 - 25392061

AN - SCOPUS:84898491245

VL - 10

SP - 44

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Dual Diagnosis

JF - Journal of Dual Diagnosis

SN - 1550-4263

IS - 1

ER -