Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome

A randomized primary care study

Patrick J. Raue, Herbert C. Schulberg, Moonseong Heo, Sibel Klimstra, Martha L. Bruce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The authors examined the association of treatment preferences with treatment initiation, adherence, and clinical outcome among nonsenior adult and senior primary care patients with depression. Methods: Sixty primary care participants meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were randomly assigned to receive treatment congruent or incongruent with their primary stated preference. Participants received either 20 weeks of escitalopram, with monitoring by a care manager, or 12 weekly sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy followed by two monthly booster sessions. Adherence to treatment and depression severity were reassessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Results: Participants expressed stronger preferences for psychotherapy than for antidepressant medication. Preference strength was a more sensitive measure of outcome than was congruence versus incongruence of preference with the assigned treatment. Across age groups, preference strength was significantly associated with treatment initiation and 12-week adherence rate but not with depression severity or remission. Conclusions: A continuous measure of preference strength may be a more useful measure in clinical practice than preferences per se. Future research should focus on whether and how greater facilitation of the treatment decision-making process between patient and clinician influences clinical outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-343
Number of pages7
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Depression
Psychotherapy
Therapeutics
Citalopram
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Antidepressive Agents
Decision Making
Age Groups
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome : A randomized primary care study. / Raue, Patrick J.; Schulberg, Herbert C.; Heo, Moonseong; Klimstra, Sibel; Bruce, Martha L.

In: Psychiatric Services, Vol. 60, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 337-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raue, Patrick J. ; Schulberg, Herbert C. ; Heo, Moonseong ; Klimstra, Sibel ; Bruce, Martha L. / Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome : A randomized primary care study. In: Psychiatric Services. 2009 ; Vol. 60, No. 3. pp. 337-343.
@article{0c6cfde9aa234db1aab074e56cdbaea5,
title = "Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome: A randomized primary care study",
abstract = "Objective: The authors examined the association of treatment preferences with treatment initiation, adherence, and clinical outcome among nonsenior adult and senior primary care patients with depression. Methods: Sixty primary care participants meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were randomly assigned to receive treatment congruent or incongruent with their primary stated preference. Participants received either 20 weeks of escitalopram, with monitoring by a care manager, or 12 weekly sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy followed by two monthly booster sessions. Adherence to treatment and depression severity were reassessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Results: Participants expressed stronger preferences for psychotherapy than for antidepressant medication. Preference strength was a more sensitive measure of outcome than was congruence versus incongruence of preference with the assigned treatment. Across age groups, preference strength was significantly associated with treatment initiation and 12-week adherence rate but not with depression severity or remission. Conclusions: A continuous measure of preference strength may be a more useful measure in clinical practice than preferences per se. Future research should focus on whether and how greater facilitation of the treatment decision-making process between patient and clinician influences clinical outcome.",
author = "Raue, {Patrick J.} and Schulberg, {Herbert C.} and Moonseong Heo and Sibel Klimstra and Bruce, {Martha L.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1176/appi.ps.60.3.337",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "337--343",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' depression treatment preferences and initiation, adherence, and outcome

T2 - A randomized primary care study

AU - Raue, Patrick J.

AU - Schulberg, Herbert C.

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Klimstra, Sibel

AU - Bruce, Martha L.

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Objective: The authors examined the association of treatment preferences with treatment initiation, adherence, and clinical outcome among nonsenior adult and senior primary care patients with depression. Methods: Sixty primary care participants meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were randomly assigned to receive treatment congruent or incongruent with their primary stated preference. Participants received either 20 weeks of escitalopram, with monitoring by a care manager, or 12 weekly sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy followed by two monthly booster sessions. Adherence to treatment and depression severity were reassessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Results: Participants expressed stronger preferences for psychotherapy than for antidepressant medication. Preference strength was a more sensitive measure of outcome than was congruence versus incongruence of preference with the assigned treatment. Across age groups, preference strength was significantly associated with treatment initiation and 12-week adherence rate but not with depression severity or remission. Conclusions: A continuous measure of preference strength may be a more useful measure in clinical practice than preferences per se. Future research should focus on whether and how greater facilitation of the treatment decision-making process between patient and clinician influences clinical outcome.

AB - Objective: The authors examined the association of treatment preferences with treatment initiation, adherence, and clinical outcome among nonsenior adult and senior primary care patients with depression. Methods: Sixty primary care participants meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression were randomly assigned to receive treatment congruent or incongruent with their primary stated preference. Participants received either 20 weeks of escitalopram, with monitoring by a care manager, or 12 weekly sessions of interpersonal psychotherapy followed by two monthly booster sessions. Adherence to treatment and depression severity were reassessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Results: Participants expressed stronger preferences for psychotherapy than for antidepressant medication. Preference strength was a more sensitive measure of outcome than was congruence versus incongruence of preference with the assigned treatment. Across age groups, preference strength was significantly associated with treatment initiation and 12-week adherence rate but not with depression severity or remission. Conclusions: A continuous measure of preference strength may be a more useful measure in clinical practice than preferences per se. Future research should focus on whether and how greater facilitation of the treatment decision-making process between patient and clinician influences clinical outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61749099487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61749099487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.60.3.337

DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.60.3.337

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 337

EP - 343

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 3

ER -