Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in New York City: The Pre-Hospital Arrest Survival Evaluation (PHASE) Study

Gary Lombardi, E. John Gallagher, Gennis Paul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

398 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City and to compare this with other urban, suburban, and rural areas. —Observational cohort study. —New York City. —Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring between October 1, 1990, and April 1, 1991. —Trained paramedics performed immediate postarrest interviews with care providers, using a standardized questionnaire. —Entry criteria, elapsed time intervals, and nodal events conformed to Utstein recommendations. The single target end point was death or discharge home. —Of 3243 consecutive cardiac arrests on which resuscitation was attempted, 2329 (72%) met entry criteria as primary cardiac events. Overall survival was 1.4% (99% confidence interval [CI], 0.9% to 2.3%). No patients were lost to follow-up. Survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation was 5.3% (99% CI, 2.9% to 8.8%). Using survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation for intersystem comparison, our survival rate was similar to that of Chicago, III (4.0%; 99% CI, 1.9% to 7.5%; P=.41), the only other large city on which data were available. However, it was significantly lower than that reported from midsized urban/suburban areas (33.0%; 99% CI, 30.4% to 35.6%; P<.0001) and suburban/rural areas (12.6%; 99% CI, 8.9% to 16.3%; P<.0001). Survival rate among arrests occurring after arrival of emergency medical services personnel (8.5%; 99% CI, 4.7% to 14.0%) was comparable with Chicago (6.6%; 99% CI, 3.3% to 11.5%; P=.41) but markedly lower than King County, Washington (36%; 99% CI, 28.6% to 43.8%; P<.0001). —Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City was poor. This was partly attributable to lengthy elapsed time intervals at every step in the chain of survival. However, examination of survival among arrests occurring after emergency medical services arrival suggests that other features may predispose residents of large cities to higher cardiac arrest mortality than individuals living in more suburban or rural settings. Since half the US population resides in large metropolitan areas, this represents a public health problem of considerable magnitude. (JAMA. 1994;271:678-683).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)678-683
Number of pages6
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume271
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Confidence Intervals
Survival
Emergency Medical Services
Ventricular Fibrillation
Heart Arrest
Survival Rate
Allied Health Personnel
Lost to Follow-Up
Resuscitation
Observational Studies
Cohort Studies
Public Health
Interviews
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in New York City : The Pre-Hospital Arrest Survival Evaluation (PHASE) Study. / Lombardi, Gary; Gallagher, E. John; Paul, Gennis.

In: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 271, No. 9, 02.03.1994, p. 678-683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{250f0d87ec81441b9ae0a93c68884355,
title = "Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in New York City: The Pre-Hospital Arrest Survival Evaluation (PHASE) Study",
abstract = "To determine survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City and to compare this with other urban, suburban, and rural areas. —Observational cohort study. —New York City. —Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring between October 1, 1990, and April 1, 1991. —Trained paramedics performed immediate postarrest interviews with care providers, using a standardized questionnaire. —Entry criteria, elapsed time intervals, and nodal events conformed to Utstein recommendations. The single target end point was death or discharge home. —Of 3243 consecutive cardiac arrests on which resuscitation was attempted, 2329 (72{\%}) met entry criteria as primary cardiac events. Overall survival was 1.4{\%} (99{\%} confidence interval [CI], 0.9{\%} to 2.3{\%}). No patients were lost to follow-up. Survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation was 5.3{\%} (99{\%} CI, 2.9{\%} to 8.8{\%}). Using survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation for intersystem comparison, our survival rate was similar to that of Chicago, III (4.0{\%}; 99{\%} CI, 1.9{\%} to 7.5{\%}; P=.41), the only other large city on which data were available. However, it was significantly lower than that reported from midsized urban/suburban areas (33.0{\%}; 99{\%} CI, 30.4{\%} to 35.6{\%}; P<.0001) and suburban/rural areas (12.6{\%}; 99{\%} CI, 8.9{\%} to 16.3{\%}; P<.0001). Survival rate among arrests occurring after arrival of emergency medical services personnel (8.5{\%}; 99{\%} CI, 4.7{\%} to 14.0{\%}) was comparable with Chicago (6.6{\%}; 99{\%} CI, 3.3{\%} to 11.5{\%}; P=.41) but markedly lower than King County, Washington (36{\%}; 99{\%} CI, 28.6{\%} to 43.8{\%}; P<.0001). —Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City was poor. This was partly attributable to lengthy elapsed time intervals at every step in the chain of survival. However, examination of survival among arrests occurring after emergency medical services arrival suggests that other features may predispose residents of large cities to higher cardiac arrest mortality than individuals living in more suburban or rural settings. Since half the US population resides in large metropolitan areas, this represents a public health problem of considerable magnitude. (JAMA. 1994;271:678-683).",
author = "Gary Lombardi and Gallagher, {E. John} and Gennis Paul",
year = "1994",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1001/jama.1994.03510330056034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "271",
pages = "678--683",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcome of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in New York City

T2 - The Pre-Hospital Arrest Survival Evaluation (PHASE) Study

AU - Lombardi, Gary

AU - Gallagher, E. John

AU - Paul, Gennis

PY - 1994/3/2

Y1 - 1994/3/2

N2 - To determine survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City and to compare this with other urban, suburban, and rural areas. —Observational cohort study. —New York City. —Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring between October 1, 1990, and April 1, 1991. —Trained paramedics performed immediate postarrest interviews with care providers, using a standardized questionnaire. —Entry criteria, elapsed time intervals, and nodal events conformed to Utstein recommendations. The single target end point was death or discharge home. —Of 3243 consecutive cardiac arrests on which resuscitation was attempted, 2329 (72%) met entry criteria as primary cardiac events. Overall survival was 1.4% (99% confidence interval [CI], 0.9% to 2.3%). No patients were lost to follow-up. Survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation was 5.3% (99% CI, 2.9% to 8.8%). Using survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation for intersystem comparison, our survival rate was similar to that of Chicago, III (4.0%; 99% CI, 1.9% to 7.5%; P=.41), the only other large city on which data were available. However, it was significantly lower than that reported from midsized urban/suburban areas (33.0%; 99% CI, 30.4% to 35.6%; P<.0001) and suburban/rural areas (12.6%; 99% CI, 8.9% to 16.3%; P<.0001). Survival rate among arrests occurring after arrival of emergency medical services personnel (8.5%; 99% CI, 4.7% to 14.0%) was comparable with Chicago (6.6%; 99% CI, 3.3% to 11.5%; P=.41) but markedly lower than King County, Washington (36%; 99% CI, 28.6% to 43.8%; P<.0001). —Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City was poor. This was partly attributable to lengthy elapsed time intervals at every step in the chain of survival. However, examination of survival among arrests occurring after emergency medical services arrival suggests that other features may predispose residents of large cities to higher cardiac arrest mortality than individuals living in more suburban or rural settings. Since half the US population resides in large metropolitan areas, this represents a public health problem of considerable magnitude. (JAMA. 1994;271:678-683).

AB - To determine survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City and to compare this with other urban, suburban, and rural areas. —Observational cohort study. —New York City. —Consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring between October 1, 1990, and April 1, 1991. —Trained paramedics performed immediate postarrest interviews with care providers, using a standardized questionnaire. —Entry criteria, elapsed time intervals, and nodal events conformed to Utstein recommendations. The single target end point was death or discharge home. —Of 3243 consecutive cardiac arrests on which resuscitation was attempted, 2329 (72%) met entry criteria as primary cardiac events. Overall survival was 1.4% (99% confidence interval [CI], 0.9% to 2.3%). No patients were lost to follow-up. Survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation was 5.3% (99% CI, 2.9% to 8.8%). Using survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation for intersystem comparison, our survival rate was similar to that of Chicago, III (4.0%; 99% CI, 1.9% to 7.5%; P=.41), the only other large city on which data were available. However, it was significantly lower than that reported from midsized urban/suburban areas (33.0%; 99% CI, 30.4% to 35.6%; P<.0001) and suburban/rural areas (12.6%; 99% CI, 8.9% to 16.3%; P<.0001). Survival rate among arrests occurring after arrival of emergency medical services personnel (8.5%; 99% CI, 4.7% to 14.0%) was comparable with Chicago (6.6%; 99% CI, 3.3% to 11.5%; P=.41) but markedly lower than King County, Washington (36%; 99% CI, 28.6% to 43.8%; P<.0001). —Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City was poor. This was partly attributable to lengthy elapsed time intervals at every step in the chain of survival. However, examination of survival among arrests occurring after emergency medical services arrival suggests that other features may predispose residents of large cities to higher cardiac arrest mortality than individuals living in more suburban or rural settings. Since half the US population resides in large metropolitan areas, this represents a public health problem of considerable magnitude. (JAMA. 1994;271:678-683).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028084488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028084488&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.1994.03510330056034

DO - 10.1001/jama.1994.03510330056034

M3 - Article

C2 - 8309030

AN - SCOPUS:0028084488

VL - 271

SP - 678

EP - 683

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 9

ER -