Otolaryngologist and pediatric oncologist perspectives on the role of fine needle aspiration in diagnosing pediatric head and neck masses

L. Roth, S. Moerdler, Daniel A. Weiser, L. Douglas, J. Gill, M. Roth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine how otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children and adolescents. Methods: We designed an electronic 28-question survey consisting of 4 clinical cases and one referral case varying by patient age, history, and physical exam findings. The survey was sent anonymously to pediatric oncologists and otolaryngologists at institutions in the United States and Canada. Results: Two hundred and thirty one pediatric oncologists (29.4%) and 87 otolaryngologists (39.5%) completed the survey. Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to recommend performing an FNA than oncologists in all four cases; less than 7% of pediatric oncologists recommended FNA for head and neck mass evaluation. Of providers who recommended FNA, otolaryngologists were more likely to do so because of diagnostic yield when compared to pediatric oncologists. However, when referred a patient with an FNA demonstrating non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the majority of pediatric oncologists (73.6%) and otolaryngologists (78.7%) would complete the staging work-up and begin treatment. If the same patient was referred with an FNA that demonstrated non-specific inflammation, most oncologists (91.0%) and otolaryngologists (94.4%) would biopsy the mass. Conclusion: Otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children, yet they both would recommend treating a patient with a positive FNA. This highlights important differences in the diagnostic process depending on which provider sees the patient first. Further studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity are needed to determine the true diagnostic yield of FNAs in the assessment of head and neck masses in children and adolescents, especially with increasing need for molecular and genomic profiling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-40
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume121
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Fine Needle Biopsy
Neck
Head
Pediatrics
Otolaryngologists
Oncologists
Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Canada
Referral and Consultation
History
Inflammation
Biopsy
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Fine needle aspiration
  • Head and neck mass
  • Lymphadenopathy
  • Pediatric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Otolaryngologist and pediatric oncologist perspectives on the role of fine needle aspiration in diagnosing pediatric head and neck masses. / Roth, L.; Moerdler, S.; Weiser, Daniel A.; Douglas, L.; Gill, J.; Roth, M.

In: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 121, 01.06.2019, p. 34-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1aa9fed8967741f9a862d3eb8072c75b,
title = "Otolaryngologist and pediatric oncologist perspectives on the role of fine needle aspiration in diagnosing pediatric head and neck masses",
abstract = "Objective: To determine how otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children and adolescents. Methods: We designed an electronic 28-question survey consisting of 4 clinical cases and one referral case varying by patient age, history, and physical exam findings. The survey was sent anonymously to pediatric oncologists and otolaryngologists at institutions in the United States and Canada. Results: Two hundred and thirty one pediatric oncologists (29.4{\%}) and 87 otolaryngologists (39.5{\%}) completed the survey. Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to recommend performing an FNA than oncologists in all four cases; less than 7{\%} of pediatric oncologists recommended FNA for head and neck mass evaluation. Of providers who recommended FNA, otolaryngologists were more likely to do so because of diagnostic yield when compared to pediatric oncologists. However, when referred a patient with an FNA demonstrating non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the majority of pediatric oncologists (73.6{\%}) and otolaryngologists (78.7{\%}) would complete the staging work-up and begin treatment. If the same patient was referred with an FNA that demonstrated non-specific inflammation, most oncologists (91.0{\%}) and otolaryngologists (94.4{\%}) would biopsy the mass. Conclusion: Otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children, yet they both would recommend treating a patient with a positive FNA. This highlights important differences in the diagnostic process depending on which provider sees the patient first. Further studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity are needed to determine the true diagnostic yield of FNAs in the assessment of head and neck masses in children and adolescents, especially with increasing need for molecular and genomic profiling.",
keywords = "Fine needle aspiration, Head and neck mass, Lymphadenopathy, Pediatric",
author = "L. Roth and S. Moerdler and Weiser, {Daniel A.} and L. Douglas and J. Gill and M. Roth",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "121",
pages = "34--40",
journal = "International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "0165-5876",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Otolaryngologist and pediatric oncologist perspectives on the role of fine needle aspiration in diagnosing pediatric head and neck masses

AU - Roth, L.

AU - Moerdler, S.

AU - Weiser, Daniel A.

AU - Douglas, L.

AU - Gill, J.

AU - Roth, M.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Objective: To determine how otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children and adolescents. Methods: We designed an electronic 28-question survey consisting of 4 clinical cases and one referral case varying by patient age, history, and physical exam findings. The survey was sent anonymously to pediatric oncologists and otolaryngologists at institutions in the United States and Canada. Results: Two hundred and thirty one pediatric oncologists (29.4%) and 87 otolaryngologists (39.5%) completed the survey. Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to recommend performing an FNA than oncologists in all four cases; less than 7% of pediatric oncologists recommended FNA for head and neck mass evaluation. Of providers who recommended FNA, otolaryngologists were more likely to do so because of diagnostic yield when compared to pediatric oncologists. However, when referred a patient with an FNA demonstrating non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the majority of pediatric oncologists (73.6%) and otolaryngologists (78.7%) would complete the staging work-up and begin treatment. If the same patient was referred with an FNA that demonstrated non-specific inflammation, most oncologists (91.0%) and otolaryngologists (94.4%) would biopsy the mass. Conclusion: Otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children, yet they both would recommend treating a patient with a positive FNA. This highlights important differences in the diagnostic process depending on which provider sees the patient first. Further studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity are needed to determine the true diagnostic yield of FNAs in the assessment of head and neck masses in children and adolescents, especially with increasing need for molecular and genomic profiling.

AB - Objective: To determine how otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children and adolescents. Methods: We designed an electronic 28-question survey consisting of 4 clinical cases and one referral case varying by patient age, history, and physical exam findings. The survey was sent anonymously to pediatric oncologists and otolaryngologists at institutions in the United States and Canada. Results: Two hundred and thirty one pediatric oncologists (29.4%) and 87 otolaryngologists (39.5%) completed the survey. Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to recommend performing an FNA than oncologists in all four cases; less than 7% of pediatric oncologists recommended FNA for head and neck mass evaluation. Of providers who recommended FNA, otolaryngologists were more likely to do so because of diagnostic yield when compared to pediatric oncologists. However, when referred a patient with an FNA demonstrating non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the majority of pediatric oncologists (73.6%) and otolaryngologists (78.7%) would complete the staging work-up and begin treatment. If the same patient was referred with an FNA that demonstrated non-specific inflammation, most oncologists (91.0%) and otolaryngologists (94.4%) would biopsy the mass. Conclusion: Otolaryngologists and pediatric oncologists differ in their initial approach to diagnosing head and neck masses in children, yet they both would recommend treating a patient with a positive FNA. This highlights important differences in the diagnostic process depending on which provider sees the patient first. Further studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity are needed to determine the true diagnostic yield of FNAs in the assessment of head and neck masses in children and adolescents, especially with increasing need for molecular and genomic profiling.

KW - Fine needle aspiration

KW - Head and neck mass

KW - Lymphadenopathy

KW - Pediatric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062573622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062573622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.03.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 30861425

AN - SCOPUS:85062573622

VL - 121

SP - 34

EP - 40

JO - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 0165-5876

ER -