Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies.

Dean G. Lorich, David S. Geller, Jason H. Nielson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures has evolved over the past 80 years because of a better understanding of fracture anatomy, application of biomechanical principles, and novel technologic advances. Surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures is the current standard of care, with short-term goals of fracture stabilization and early patient mobilization and the long-term objective of restoring patients to their previous level of independence and function. Treatment for stable intertrochanteric hip fractures includes use of percutaneous intramedullary devices and open reduction and internal fixation using a sliding hip screw. To date, none of these devices has shown any clear clinical advantage over the dynamic hip screw. Intramedullary fixation has multiple theoretical advantages for the treatment of unstable fracture patterns; however, it remains unclear if ultimate functional outcome warrants the added expense of such treatment. For patients with a reverse obliquity fracture pattern, the advantage of the intramedullary construct has been shown.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)441-454
Number of pages14
JournalInstructional course lectures
Volume53
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hip Fractures
Hip
Therapeutics
Equipment and Supplies
Early Ambulation
Standard of Care
Anatomy

Cite this

Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures : management and current controversies. / Lorich, Dean G.; Geller, David S.; Nielson, Jason H.

In: Instructional course lectures, Vol. 53, 2004, p. 441-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de3203b4dac544a5a6a7cfe658e08313,
title = "Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures: management and current controversies.",
abstract = "The treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures has evolved over the past 80 years because of a better understanding of fracture anatomy, application of biomechanical principles, and novel technologic advances. Surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures is the current standard of care, with short-term goals of fracture stabilization and early patient mobilization and the long-term objective of restoring patients to their previous level of independence and function. Treatment for stable intertrochanteric hip fractures includes use of percutaneous intramedullary devices and open reduction and internal fixation using a sliding hip screw. To date, none of these devices has shown any clear clinical advantage over the dynamic hip screw. Intramedullary fixation has multiple theoretical advantages for the treatment of unstable fracture patterns; however, it remains unclear if ultimate functional outcome warrants the added expense of such treatment. For patients with a reverse obliquity fracture pattern, the advantage of the intramedullary construct has been shown.",
author = "Lorich, {Dean G.} and Geller, {David S.} and Nielson, {Jason H.}",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "441--454",
journal = "Instructional course lectures",
issn = "0065-6895",
publisher = "American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Osteoporotic pertrochanteric hip fractures

T2 - management and current controversies.

AU - Lorich, Dean G.

AU - Geller, David S.

AU - Nielson, Jason H.

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures has evolved over the past 80 years because of a better understanding of fracture anatomy, application of biomechanical principles, and novel technologic advances. Surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures is the current standard of care, with short-term goals of fracture stabilization and early patient mobilization and the long-term objective of restoring patients to their previous level of independence and function. Treatment for stable intertrochanteric hip fractures includes use of percutaneous intramedullary devices and open reduction and internal fixation using a sliding hip screw. To date, none of these devices has shown any clear clinical advantage over the dynamic hip screw. Intramedullary fixation has multiple theoretical advantages for the treatment of unstable fracture patterns; however, it remains unclear if ultimate functional outcome warrants the added expense of such treatment. For patients with a reverse obliquity fracture pattern, the advantage of the intramedullary construct has been shown.

AB - The treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures has evolved over the past 80 years because of a better understanding of fracture anatomy, application of biomechanical principles, and novel technologic advances. Surgical treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures is the current standard of care, with short-term goals of fracture stabilization and early patient mobilization and the long-term objective of restoring patients to their previous level of independence and function. Treatment for stable intertrochanteric hip fractures includes use of percutaneous intramedullary devices and open reduction and internal fixation using a sliding hip screw. To date, none of these devices has shown any clear clinical advantage over the dynamic hip screw. Intramedullary fixation has multiple theoretical advantages for the treatment of unstable fracture patterns; however, it remains unclear if ultimate functional outcome warrants the added expense of such treatment. For patients with a reverse obliquity fracture pattern, the advantage of the intramedullary construct has been shown.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342612710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342612710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15116633

AN - SCOPUS:2342612710

VL - 53

SP - 441

EP - 454

JO - Instructional course lectures

JF - Instructional course lectures

SN - 0065-6895

ER -