Optotype acuity and re-operation rate after unilateral cataract surgery during the first 6 months of life with or without IOL implantation

Scott R. Lambert, M. Lynn, C. Drews-Botsch, L. DuBois, D. A. Plager, Norman B. Medow, M. E. Wilson, E. G. Buckley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To compare optotype acuities and re-operation rates in children corrected with a contact lens (CL) compared with an intraocular lens (IOL) following unilateral cataract extraction during infancy in a non-randomised, retrospective case series. Methods: 25 infants with a unilateral congenital cataract underwent cataract surgery with (IOL group, n = 12) or without (CL group, n = 13) IOL implantation when <7 months of age. Optotype acuities were assessed in 19 of these children at a mean age of 4.3 years (range 3.3-5.5 years). The number of re-operations were assessed in 21 children. Results: The visual acuity results were similar in the two treatment groups (p = 0.99); however, two of the four (50%) children in the IOL group compared with two of the seven (28%) children in the CL group undergoing surgery during the first 6 weeks of life had 20/40 or better visual acuity. The children in the IOL group had more re-operations than the children in the CL group (mean 1.1 v 0.36). Most of the re-operations in the IOL group were membranectomies performed during the first year of life (median 8.0 months) whereas all of the re-operations in the CL group were the implantation of a secondary IOL later in childhood (mean 2.2 years). Conclusion: Optotype acuities were similar for the children corrected with a CL compared with IOL, while the children in the IOL group underwent more re-operations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1387-1390
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume88
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intraocular Lens Implantation
Intraocular Lenses
Cataract
Contact Lenses
Visual Acuity
Cataract Extraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Optotype acuity and re-operation rate after unilateral cataract surgery during the first 6 months of life with or without IOL implantation. / Lambert, Scott R.; Lynn, M.; Drews-Botsch, C.; DuBois, L.; Plager, D. A.; Medow, Norman B.; Wilson, M. E.; Buckley, E. G.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 88, No. 11, 11.2004, p. 1387-1390.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lambert, Scott R. ; Lynn, M. ; Drews-Botsch, C. ; DuBois, L. ; Plager, D. A. ; Medow, Norman B. ; Wilson, M. E. ; Buckley, E. G. / Optotype acuity and re-operation rate after unilateral cataract surgery during the first 6 months of life with or without IOL implantation. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2004 ; Vol. 88, No. 11. pp. 1387-1390.
@article{69ce4a6162ca4916b069a23766ca5a22,
title = "Optotype acuity and re-operation rate after unilateral cataract surgery during the first 6 months of life with or without IOL implantation",
abstract = "Aims: To compare optotype acuities and re-operation rates in children corrected with a contact lens (CL) compared with an intraocular lens (IOL) following unilateral cataract extraction during infancy in a non-randomised, retrospective case series. Methods: 25 infants with a unilateral congenital cataract underwent cataract surgery with (IOL group, n = 12) or without (CL group, n = 13) IOL implantation when <7 months of age. Optotype acuities were assessed in 19 of these children at a mean age of 4.3 years (range 3.3-5.5 years). The number of re-operations were assessed in 21 children. Results: The visual acuity results were similar in the two treatment groups (p = 0.99); however, two of the four (50{\%}) children in the IOL group compared with two of the seven (28{\%}) children in the CL group undergoing surgery during the first 6 weeks of life had 20/40 or better visual acuity. The children in the IOL group had more re-operations than the children in the CL group (mean 1.1 v 0.36). Most of the re-operations in the IOL group were membranectomies performed during the first year of life (median 8.0 months) whereas all of the re-operations in the CL group were the implantation of a secondary IOL later in childhood (mean 2.2 years). Conclusion: Optotype acuities were similar for the children corrected with a CL compared with IOL, while the children in the IOL group underwent more re-operations.",
author = "Lambert, {Scott R.} and M. Lynn and C. Drews-Botsch and L. DuBois and Plager, {D. A.} and Medow, {Norman B.} and Wilson, {M. E.} and Buckley, {E. G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1136/bjo.2004.045609",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "1387--1390",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optotype acuity and re-operation rate after unilateral cataract surgery during the first 6 months of life with or without IOL implantation

AU - Lambert, Scott R.

AU - Lynn, M.

AU - Drews-Botsch, C.

AU - DuBois, L.

AU - Plager, D. A.

AU - Medow, Norman B.

AU - Wilson, M. E.

AU - Buckley, E. G.

PY - 2004/11

Y1 - 2004/11

N2 - Aims: To compare optotype acuities and re-operation rates in children corrected with a contact lens (CL) compared with an intraocular lens (IOL) following unilateral cataract extraction during infancy in a non-randomised, retrospective case series. Methods: 25 infants with a unilateral congenital cataract underwent cataract surgery with (IOL group, n = 12) or without (CL group, n = 13) IOL implantation when <7 months of age. Optotype acuities were assessed in 19 of these children at a mean age of 4.3 years (range 3.3-5.5 years). The number of re-operations were assessed in 21 children. Results: The visual acuity results were similar in the two treatment groups (p = 0.99); however, two of the four (50%) children in the IOL group compared with two of the seven (28%) children in the CL group undergoing surgery during the first 6 weeks of life had 20/40 or better visual acuity. The children in the IOL group had more re-operations than the children in the CL group (mean 1.1 v 0.36). Most of the re-operations in the IOL group were membranectomies performed during the first year of life (median 8.0 months) whereas all of the re-operations in the CL group were the implantation of a secondary IOL later in childhood (mean 2.2 years). Conclusion: Optotype acuities were similar for the children corrected with a CL compared with IOL, while the children in the IOL group underwent more re-operations.

AB - Aims: To compare optotype acuities and re-operation rates in children corrected with a contact lens (CL) compared with an intraocular lens (IOL) following unilateral cataract extraction during infancy in a non-randomised, retrospective case series. Methods: 25 infants with a unilateral congenital cataract underwent cataract surgery with (IOL group, n = 12) or without (CL group, n = 13) IOL implantation when <7 months of age. Optotype acuities were assessed in 19 of these children at a mean age of 4.3 years (range 3.3-5.5 years). The number of re-operations were assessed in 21 children. Results: The visual acuity results were similar in the two treatment groups (p = 0.99); however, two of the four (50%) children in the IOL group compared with two of the seven (28%) children in the CL group undergoing surgery during the first 6 weeks of life had 20/40 or better visual acuity. The children in the IOL group had more re-operations than the children in the CL group (mean 1.1 v 0.36). Most of the re-operations in the IOL group were membranectomies performed during the first year of life (median 8.0 months) whereas all of the re-operations in the CL group were the implantation of a secondary IOL later in childhood (mean 2.2 years). Conclusion: Optotype acuities were similar for the children corrected with a CL compared with IOL, while the children in the IOL group underwent more re-operations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7044233033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7044233033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2004.045609

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2004.045609

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 1387

EP - 1390

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 11

ER -