Neoreticularism and neuronal polarization

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Santiago Ramón y Cajal made immense contributions to neuroscience, and the era in which his work is cited is likely to be longer than that for any other present or future neuroscientist. This commentary notes that there is qualification to the doctrine that neurons are distinct entities rather than reticular. Namely, gap junctions provide a private pathway between coupled cells that, at an ultramicroscopic scale, can be considered cytoplasmic continuity. Cytoplasmic continuity permits, but does not require, conduction in either direction across an electrical synapse. Furthermore, sites of impulse initiation can differ in the same or different cells; there is no universal direction of impulse propagation and it may differ in the same cell under different conditions; thus, there are exceptions to the law of "dynamic polarization". Cajal leaves ample evidence in his writings that he would have no difficulty in accepting these very minor modifications to the vast body of his contributions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-201
Number of pages13
JournalProgress in Brain Research
Volume136
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Electrical Synapses
Gap Junctions
Neurosciences
Neurons
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Neoreticularism and neuronal polarization. / Bennett, Michael V. L.

In: Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 136, 2002, p. 189-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d022566f9b474374a28eb0ec8deaf68e,
title = "Neoreticularism and neuronal polarization",
abstract = "Santiago Ram{\'o}n y Cajal made immense contributions to neuroscience, and the era in which his work is cited is likely to be longer than that for any other present or future neuroscientist. This commentary notes that there is qualification to the doctrine that neurons are distinct entities rather than reticular. Namely, gap junctions provide a private pathway between coupled cells that, at an ultramicroscopic scale, can be considered cytoplasmic continuity. Cytoplasmic continuity permits, but does not require, conduction in either direction across an electrical synapse. Furthermore, sites of impulse initiation can differ in the same or different cells; there is no universal direction of impulse propagation and it may differ in the same cell under different conditions; thus, there are exceptions to the law of {"}dynamic polarization{"}. Cajal leaves ample evidence in his writings that he would have no difficulty in accepting these very minor modifications to the vast body of his contributions.",
author = "Bennett, {Michael V. L.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0079-6123(02)36017-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "189--201",
journal = "Progress in Brain Research",
issn = "0079-6123",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neoreticularism and neuronal polarization

AU - Bennett, Michael V. L.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Santiago Ramón y Cajal made immense contributions to neuroscience, and the era in which his work is cited is likely to be longer than that for any other present or future neuroscientist. This commentary notes that there is qualification to the doctrine that neurons are distinct entities rather than reticular. Namely, gap junctions provide a private pathway between coupled cells that, at an ultramicroscopic scale, can be considered cytoplasmic continuity. Cytoplasmic continuity permits, but does not require, conduction in either direction across an electrical synapse. Furthermore, sites of impulse initiation can differ in the same or different cells; there is no universal direction of impulse propagation and it may differ in the same cell under different conditions; thus, there are exceptions to the law of "dynamic polarization". Cajal leaves ample evidence in his writings that he would have no difficulty in accepting these very minor modifications to the vast body of his contributions.

AB - Santiago Ramón y Cajal made immense contributions to neuroscience, and the era in which his work is cited is likely to be longer than that for any other present or future neuroscientist. This commentary notes that there is qualification to the doctrine that neurons are distinct entities rather than reticular. Namely, gap junctions provide a private pathway between coupled cells that, at an ultramicroscopic scale, can be considered cytoplasmic continuity. Cytoplasmic continuity permits, but does not require, conduction in either direction across an electrical synapse. Furthermore, sites of impulse initiation can differ in the same or different cells; there is no universal direction of impulse propagation and it may differ in the same cell under different conditions; thus, there are exceptions to the law of "dynamic polarization". Cajal leaves ample evidence in his writings that he would have no difficulty in accepting these very minor modifications to the vast body of his contributions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036454731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036454731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)36017-5

DO - 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)36017-5

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 189

EP - 201

JO - Progress in Brain Research

JF - Progress in Brain Research

SN - 0079-6123

ER -