Motor cortex extirpation (1886-1950): The influence of Sir Victor Horsley

Joel A. Vilensky, Sid Gilman, Tze Ching Tan, Peter Mc L Black, Edward R. Laws, James Tait Goodrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To delineate Sir Victor Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who subsequently reported (through 1950) on the effects of motor cortex extirpation surgery. METHODS: We used the available literature to divide Horsley's influence into five categories, i.e., direct trainee, via a trainee or colleague, via personal contact and publications, via publications only, and no evidence of influence. RESULTS: Of 15 later neurosurgeons who reported results through 1950, the numbers corresponding to the five categories were 1, 6, 2, 3, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who performed motor cortex extirpation surgery was primarily indirect, with most influence occurring via trainees of his students or colleagues. Although indirectly associated with Horsley, Paul Bucy was his truest disciple.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1484-1488
Number of pages5
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume51
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Motor Cortex
Publications
Students
Neurosurgeons

Keywords

  • Extirpation surgery
  • Motor cortex
  • Victor Horsley

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Motor cortex extirpation (1886-1950) : The influence of Sir Victor Horsley. / Vilensky, Joel A.; Gilman, Sid; Tan, Tze Ching; Black, Peter Mc L; Laws, Edward R.; Goodrich, James Tait.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 51, No. 6, 01.12.2002, p. 1484-1488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vilensky, Joel A. ; Gilman, Sid ; Tan, Tze Ching ; Black, Peter Mc L ; Laws, Edward R. ; Goodrich, James Tait. / Motor cortex extirpation (1886-1950) : The influence of Sir Victor Horsley. In: Neurosurgery. 2002 ; Vol. 51, No. 6. pp. 1484-1488.
@article{4eb6f80fb7b54b9b9e22b894b44d3993,
title = "Motor cortex extirpation (1886-1950): The influence of Sir Victor Horsley",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To delineate Sir Victor Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who subsequently reported (through 1950) on the effects of motor cortex extirpation surgery. METHODS: We used the available literature to divide Horsley's influence into five categories, i.e., direct trainee, via a trainee or colleague, via personal contact and publications, via publications only, and no evidence of influence. RESULTS: Of 15 later neurosurgeons who reported results through 1950, the numbers corresponding to the five categories were 1, 6, 2, 3, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who performed motor cortex extirpation surgery was primarily indirect, with most influence occurring via trainees of his students or colleagues. Although indirectly associated with Horsley, Paul Bucy was his truest disciple.",
keywords = "Extirpation surgery, Motor cortex, Victor Horsley",
author = "Vilensky, {Joel A.} and Sid Gilman and Tan, {Tze Ching} and Black, {Peter Mc L} and Laws, {Edward R.} and Goodrich, {James Tait}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00006123-200212000-00020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1484--1488",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor cortex extirpation (1886-1950)

T2 - The influence of Sir Victor Horsley

AU - Vilensky, Joel A.

AU - Gilman, Sid

AU - Tan, Tze Ching

AU - Black, Peter Mc L

AU - Laws, Edward R.

AU - Goodrich, James Tait

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To delineate Sir Victor Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who subsequently reported (through 1950) on the effects of motor cortex extirpation surgery. METHODS: We used the available literature to divide Horsley's influence into five categories, i.e., direct trainee, via a trainee or colleague, via personal contact and publications, via publications only, and no evidence of influence. RESULTS: Of 15 later neurosurgeons who reported results through 1950, the numbers corresponding to the five categories were 1, 6, 2, 3, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who performed motor cortex extirpation surgery was primarily indirect, with most influence occurring via trainees of his students or colleagues. Although indirectly associated with Horsley, Paul Bucy was his truest disciple.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To delineate Sir Victor Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who subsequently reported (through 1950) on the effects of motor cortex extirpation surgery. METHODS: We used the available literature to divide Horsley's influence into five categories, i.e., direct trainee, via a trainee or colleague, via personal contact and publications, via publications only, and no evidence of influence. RESULTS: Of 15 later neurosurgeons who reported results through 1950, the numbers corresponding to the five categories were 1, 6, 2, 3, and 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Horsley's influence on neurosurgeons who performed motor cortex extirpation surgery was primarily indirect, with most influence occurring via trainees of his students or colleagues. Although indirectly associated with Horsley, Paul Bucy was his truest disciple.

KW - Extirpation surgery

KW - Motor cortex

KW - Victor Horsley

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036956974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036956974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00006123-200212000-00020

DO - 10.1097/00006123-200212000-00020

M3 - Article

C2 - 12445355

AN - SCOPUS:0036956974

VL - 51

SP - 1484

EP - 1488

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 6

ER -