TY - JOUR
T1 - Most positive HIV western blot tests do not diagnose new cases in New York City
T2 - Implications for HIV testing programs
AU - Hanna, David B.
AU - Tsoi, Benjamin W.
AU - Begier, Elizabeth M.
PY - 2009/8/1
Y1 - 2009/8/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate HIV testing efforts based on surveillance data. METHODS:: We determined the contribution of new diagnoses to all positive confidential HIV-1 Western blotting conducted in New York City between 2004 and 2006 based on clinical history recorded in the HIV Surveillance Registry, by testing site type. RESULTS:: Of 31,504 positive Western blots reported and linked to Registry cases, 36.8% were new diagnoses and 63.2% were repeat positive tests. City health department clinics and private physicians' offices reported greater proportions of new diagnoses than other testing sites (64.4% and 58.3% vs. 31.1%). The percentage of positive tests at health department clinics that were new diagnoses increased from 59.8% in 2004 to 69.0% in 2006 (P = 0.001), coinciding with efforts to expand HIV testing. Repeat positive testers were significantly older, more likely to have an injection drug use history or AIDS, and less likely to be foreign-born. CONCLUSIONS:: Repeat testing of known HIV-infected persons is common and an inefficient use of HIV prevention resources when the purpose of testing is to diagnose previously unidentified infections. Initiatives to increase HIV testing should be evaluated routinely using surveillance data to determine the proportion of infected persons identified who are newly diagnosed.
AB - OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate HIV testing efforts based on surveillance data. METHODS:: We determined the contribution of new diagnoses to all positive confidential HIV-1 Western blotting conducted in New York City between 2004 and 2006 based on clinical history recorded in the HIV Surveillance Registry, by testing site type. RESULTS:: Of 31,504 positive Western blots reported and linked to Registry cases, 36.8% were new diagnoses and 63.2% were repeat positive tests. City health department clinics and private physicians' offices reported greater proportions of new diagnoses than other testing sites (64.4% and 58.3% vs. 31.1%). The percentage of positive tests at health department clinics that were new diagnoses increased from 59.8% in 2004 to 69.0% in 2006 (P = 0.001), coinciding with efforts to expand HIV testing. Repeat positive testers were significantly older, more likely to have an injection drug use history or AIDS, and less likely to be foreign-born. CONCLUSIONS:: Repeat testing of known HIV-infected persons is common and an inefficient use of HIV prevention resources when the purpose of testing is to diagnose previously unidentified infections. Initiatives to increase HIV testing should be evaluated routinely using surveillance data to determine the proportion of infected persons identified who are newly diagnosed.
KW - Case finding
KW - Evaluation studies
KW - HIV diagnostic tests
KW - Surveillance
KW - Western blotting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68449086885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68449086885&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a4488f
DO - 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a4488f
M3 - Article
C2 - 19430305
AN - SCOPUS:68449086885
SN - 1525-4135
VL - 51
SP - 609
EP - 614
JO - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology
JF - Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology
IS - 5
ER -