Minimally invasive surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Vishal Sarwahi, Jonathan J. Horn, Preethi M. Kulkarni, Adam L. Wollowick, Yungtai Lo, Melanie Gambassi, Terry D. Amaral

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: This is a retrospective controlled study. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to the standard open posterior approach (PSF). Summary of Background Data: MIS approaches offer the potential to reduce soft-tissue trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical-site infection. Thus far, MIS has been successfully utilized for the surgical correction of multilevel spine pathology in adults. It is not yet known if these results can be replicated in the surgical management of AIS. Materials and Methods: Seven MIS patients were compared with 15 PSF patients using minimum 2-year follow-up data. Parameters studied included preoperative patient and deformity characteristics, perioperative details, extent of deformity correction, and complications. Data were compared using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Results: The MIS and PSF groups were similar for all preoperative characteristics collected (P>0.05). MIS patients had fewer fixation points (P=0.015), but a longer median operative time (P=0.011). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) (P=0.051), EBL/fixation point (P=0.204), or amount of fluids administered (P=0.888). Postoperative recovery did not differ between the 2 groups in number of intensive care unit days (P=0.362), length of hospital stay (P=0.472), time to mobilization (P=1.00), Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (P=0.698), or patient-controlled analgesia (P=1.00). The MIS technique had similar deformity correction, screw placement accuracy, and fusion status when compared with the PSF group. MIS patients had lower blood transfusion rate (P=0.02), shorter fusion (P=0.046) and fewer pedicle screws (P=0.015). Conclusions: The short-term advantages seen in MIS for adult scoliosis were not as obvious in our series. We found similar deformity correction and adequate fusion, however shortcomings related to learning curve, and instrumentation persist. MIS surgery is an innovative treatment for AIS that is technically feasible with significantly lower transfusion rate, shorter fusion lenghts and lesser pedicle screw fixation. Despite these advanatges, its role in AIS is currently difficut to define.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)331-340
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Spine Surgery
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Scoliosis
Length of Stay
Surgical Wound Infection
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Learning Curve
Pain Measurement
Operative Time
Blood Transfusion
Intensive Care Units
Spine
Retrospective Studies
Pathology
Safety

Keywords

  • adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • pedicle screw instrumentation
  • posterior spinal fusion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Sarwahi, V., Horn, J. J., Kulkarni, P. M., Wollowick, A. L., Lo, Y., Gambassi, M., & Amaral, T. D. (2016). Minimally invasive surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Clinical Spine Surgery, 29(8), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000106

Minimally invasive surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. / Sarwahi, Vishal; Horn, Jonathan J.; Kulkarni, Preethi M.; Wollowick, Adam L.; Lo, Yungtai; Gambassi, Melanie; Amaral, Terry D.

In: Clinical Spine Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 8, 01.10.2016, p. 331-340.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sarwahi, V, Horn, JJ, Kulkarni, PM, Wollowick, AL, Lo, Y, Gambassi, M & Amaral, TD 2016, 'Minimally invasive surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis', Clinical Spine Surgery, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000106
Sarwahi, Vishal ; Horn, Jonathan J. ; Kulkarni, Preethi M. ; Wollowick, Adam L. ; Lo, Yungtai ; Gambassi, Melanie ; Amaral, Terry D. / Minimally invasive surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In: Clinical Spine Surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 8. pp. 331-340.
@article{f8fff6307282408f8e0c137af37875aa,
title = "Minimally invasive surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis",
abstract = "Study Design: This is a retrospective controlled study. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to the standard open posterior approach (PSF). Summary of Background Data: MIS approaches offer the potential to reduce soft-tissue trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical-site infection. Thus far, MIS has been successfully utilized for the surgical correction of multilevel spine pathology in adults. It is not yet known if these results can be replicated in the surgical management of AIS. Materials and Methods: Seven MIS patients were compared with 15 PSF patients using minimum 2-year follow-up data. Parameters studied included preoperative patient and deformity characteristics, perioperative details, extent of deformity correction, and complications. Data were compared using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Results: The MIS and PSF groups were similar for all preoperative characteristics collected (P>0.05). MIS patients had fewer fixation points (P=0.015), but a longer median operative time (P=0.011). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) (P=0.051), EBL/fixation point (P=0.204), or amount of fluids administered (P=0.888). Postoperative recovery did not differ between the 2 groups in number of intensive care unit days (P=0.362), length of hospital stay (P=0.472), time to mobilization (P=1.00), Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (P=0.698), or patient-controlled analgesia (P=1.00). The MIS technique had similar deformity correction, screw placement accuracy, and fusion status when compared with the PSF group. MIS patients had lower blood transfusion rate (P=0.02), shorter fusion (P=0.046) and fewer pedicle screws (P=0.015). Conclusions: The short-term advantages seen in MIS for adult scoliosis were not as obvious in our series. We found similar deformity correction and adequate fusion, however shortcomings related to learning curve, and instrumentation persist. MIS surgery is an innovative treatment for AIS that is technically feasible with significantly lower transfusion rate, shorter fusion lenghts and lesser pedicle screw fixation. Despite these advanatges, its role in AIS is currently difficut to define.",
keywords = "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, minimally invasive surgery, pedicle screw instrumentation, posterior spinal fusion",
author = "Vishal Sarwahi and Horn, {Jonathan J.} and Kulkarni, {Preethi M.} and Wollowick, {Adam L.} and Yungtai Lo and Melanie Gambassi and Amaral, {Terry D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BSD.0000000000000106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "331--340",
journal = "Clinical Spine Surgery",
issn = "2380-0186",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

AU - Sarwahi, Vishal

AU - Horn, Jonathan J.

AU - Kulkarni, Preethi M.

AU - Wollowick, Adam L.

AU - Lo, Yungtai

AU - Gambassi, Melanie

AU - Amaral, Terry D.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Study Design: This is a retrospective controlled study. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to the standard open posterior approach (PSF). Summary of Background Data: MIS approaches offer the potential to reduce soft-tissue trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical-site infection. Thus far, MIS has been successfully utilized for the surgical correction of multilevel spine pathology in adults. It is not yet known if these results can be replicated in the surgical management of AIS. Materials and Methods: Seven MIS patients were compared with 15 PSF patients using minimum 2-year follow-up data. Parameters studied included preoperative patient and deformity characteristics, perioperative details, extent of deformity correction, and complications. Data were compared using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Results: The MIS and PSF groups were similar for all preoperative characteristics collected (P>0.05). MIS patients had fewer fixation points (P=0.015), but a longer median operative time (P=0.011). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) (P=0.051), EBL/fixation point (P=0.204), or amount of fluids administered (P=0.888). Postoperative recovery did not differ between the 2 groups in number of intensive care unit days (P=0.362), length of hospital stay (P=0.472), time to mobilization (P=1.00), Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (P=0.698), or patient-controlled analgesia (P=1.00). The MIS technique had similar deformity correction, screw placement accuracy, and fusion status when compared with the PSF group. MIS patients had lower blood transfusion rate (P=0.02), shorter fusion (P=0.046) and fewer pedicle screws (P=0.015). Conclusions: The short-term advantages seen in MIS for adult scoliosis were not as obvious in our series. We found similar deformity correction and adequate fusion, however shortcomings related to learning curve, and instrumentation persist. MIS surgery is an innovative treatment for AIS that is technically feasible with significantly lower transfusion rate, shorter fusion lenghts and lesser pedicle screw fixation. Despite these advanatges, its role in AIS is currently difficut to define.

AB - Study Design: This is a retrospective controlled study. Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) to the standard open posterior approach (PSF). Summary of Background Data: MIS approaches offer the potential to reduce soft-tissue trauma, intraoperative blood loss, and surgical-site infection. Thus far, MIS has been successfully utilized for the surgical correction of multilevel spine pathology in adults. It is not yet known if these results can be replicated in the surgical management of AIS. Materials and Methods: Seven MIS patients were compared with 15 PSF patients using minimum 2-year follow-up data. Parameters studied included preoperative patient and deformity characteristics, perioperative details, extent of deformity correction, and complications. Data were compared using Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Results: The MIS and PSF groups were similar for all preoperative characteristics collected (P>0.05). MIS patients had fewer fixation points (P=0.015), but a longer median operative time (P=0.011). There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) (P=0.051), EBL/fixation point (P=0.204), or amount of fluids administered (P=0.888). Postoperative recovery did not differ between the 2 groups in number of intensive care unit days (P=0.362), length of hospital stay (P=0.472), time to mobilization (P=1.00), Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (P=0.698), or patient-controlled analgesia (P=1.00). The MIS technique had similar deformity correction, screw placement accuracy, and fusion status when compared with the PSF group. MIS patients had lower blood transfusion rate (P=0.02), shorter fusion (P=0.046) and fewer pedicle screws (P=0.015). Conclusions: The short-term advantages seen in MIS for adult scoliosis were not as obvious in our series. We found similar deformity correction and adequate fusion, however shortcomings related to learning curve, and instrumentation persist. MIS surgery is an innovative treatment for AIS that is technically feasible with significantly lower transfusion rate, shorter fusion lenghts and lesser pedicle screw fixation. Despite these advanatges, its role in AIS is currently difficut to define.

KW - adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

KW - minimally invasive surgery

KW - pedicle screw instrumentation

KW - posterior spinal fusion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992143379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992143379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000106

DO - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000106

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 331

EP - 340

JO - Clinical Spine Surgery

JF - Clinical Spine Surgery

SN - 2380-0186

IS - 8

ER -