Management of the prostate and urethra in patients undergoing radical cystectomy

Brian K. McNeil, Mark P. Schoenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For individuals with muscle invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy has remained the gold standard for treatment. Due to the common post operative complaints in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder formation i.e. sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence, members of the urologic community have sought ways to ameliorate these side effects with prostate and urethra sparing surgery. This review pre-sents that topic based on the contemporary literature regarding the management of the prostate and urethra in men and women undergoing radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Prostate sparing cystectomy remains controversial. Those in favor of it emphasize sub-stantial improvements in functional outcomes and the effect that it could have on patients' quality of life. Those opposed to it cite increased oncologic risk and violation of the oncologic principle of en bloc excision of at-risk organs. The most current information related to this ongoing debate is presented and discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-144
Number of pages4
JournalCentral European Journal of Urology
Volume62
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cystectomy
Urethra
Prostate
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Organs at Risk
Literature
Muscles
Urinary Incontinence
Quality of Life
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Bladder cancer
  • Cystectomy
  • Prostate and urethra management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Management of the prostate and urethra in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. / McNeil, Brian K.; Schoenberg, Mark P.

In: Central European Journal of Urology, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2009, p. 141-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d7a1b6337ae4898839612d68a6019f2,
title = "Management of the prostate and urethra in patients undergoing radical cystectomy",
abstract = "For individuals with muscle invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy has remained the gold standard for treatment. Due to the common post operative complaints in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder formation i.e. sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence, members of the urologic community have sought ways to ameliorate these side effects with prostate and urethra sparing surgery. This review pre-sents that topic based on the contemporary literature regarding the management of the prostate and urethra in men and women undergoing radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Prostate sparing cystectomy remains controversial. Those in favor of it emphasize sub-stantial improvements in functional outcomes and the effect that it could have on patients' quality of life. Those opposed to it cite increased oncologic risk and violation of the oncologic principle of en bloc excision of at-risk organs. The most current information related to this ongoing debate is presented and discussed.",
keywords = "Bladder cancer, Cystectomy, Prostate and urethra management",
author = "McNeil, {Brian K.} and Schoenberg, {Mark P.}",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "141--144",
journal = "Central European Journal of Urology",
issn = "2080-4806",
publisher = "Panstwowy Zaklad Wydawnictw Lekarskich",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of the prostate and urethra in patients undergoing radical cystectomy

AU - McNeil, Brian K.

AU - Schoenberg, Mark P.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - For individuals with muscle invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy has remained the gold standard for treatment. Due to the common post operative complaints in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder formation i.e. sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence, members of the urologic community have sought ways to ameliorate these side effects with prostate and urethra sparing surgery. This review pre-sents that topic based on the contemporary literature regarding the management of the prostate and urethra in men and women undergoing radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Prostate sparing cystectomy remains controversial. Those in favor of it emphasize sub-stantial improvements in functional outcomes and the effect that it could have on patients' quality of life. Those opposed to it cite increased oncologic risk and violation of the oncologic principle of en bloc excision of at-risk organs. The most current information related to this ongoing debate is presented and discussed.

AB - For individuals with muscle invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy has remained the gold standard for treatment. Due to the common post operative complaints in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder formation i.e. sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence, members of the urologic community have sought ways to ameliorate these side effects with prostate and urethra sparing surgery. This review pre-sents that topic based on the contemporary literature regarding the management of the prostate and urethra in men and women undergoing radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Prostate sparing cystectomy remains controversial. Those in favor of it emphasize sub-stantial improvements in functional outcomes and the effect that it could have on patients' quality of life. Those opposed to it cite increased oncologic risk and violation of the oncologic principle of en bloc excision of at-risk organs. The most current information related to this ongoing debate is presented and discussed.

KW - Bladder cancer

KW - Cystectomy

KW - Prostate and urethra management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960671656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960671656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 141

EP - 144

JO - Central European Journal of Urology

JF - Central European Journal of Urology

SN - 2080-4806

IS - 3

ER -