Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation

An operation without increased morbidity

Peter Nau, W. Scott Melvin, Vimal K. Narula, P. Mark Bloomston, E. Christopher Ellison, Peter Muscarella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. The advent of minimally invasive techniques was marked by a paradigm shift towards the use of laparoscopy for benign distal pancreatic masses. Herein we describe one center's experience with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed for all distal pancreatectomies completed laparoscopically from 1999 to 2009. Outcomes from those cases completed with a concurrent splenectomy were compared to the spleen-preserving procedures. Results. Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Seven had spleen-conserving operations. There was no difference in the mean estimated blood loss (316 versus 285mL, P=.5) or operative time (179 versus 170minutes, P=.9). The mean tumor size was not significantly different (3.1 versus 2.2cm, P=.9). There was no difference in the average hospital stay (7.1 versus 7.0 days, P=.7). Complications in the spleen-preserving group included one iatrogenic colon injury, two pancreatic fistulas, and two cases of iatrogenic diabetes. In the splenectomy group, two developed respiratory failure, three acquired iatrogenic diabetes, and two suffered pancreatic fistulas (71 versus 41, P=.4). Conclusions. The laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe operation with a low morbidity. Splenic conservation does not significantly increase the morbidity of the procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number846340
JournalGastroenterology Research and Practice
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pancreatectomy
Morbidity
Pancreatic Fistula
Spleen
Splenectomy
Operative Time
Respiratory Insufficiency
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Colon
Wounds and Injuries
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology
  • Hepatology

Cite this

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation : An operation without increased morbidity. / Nau, Peter; Melvin, W. Scott; Narula, Vimal K.; Bloomston, P. Mark; Ellison, E. Christopher; Muscarella, Peter.

In: Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1f6b1c15232548b1b2d12b1870c12d3e,
title = "Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation: An operation without increased morbidity",
abstract = "Objectives. The advent of minimally invasive techniques was marked by a paradigm shift towards the use of laparoscopy for benign distal pancreatic masses. Herein we describe one center's experience with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed for all distal pancreatectomies completed laparoscopically from 1999 to 2009. Outcomes from those cases completed with a concurrent splenectomy were compared to the spleen-preserving procedures. Results. Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Seven had spleen-conserving operations. There was no difference in the mean estimated blood loss (316 versus 285mL, P=.5) or operative time (179 versus 170minutes, P=.9). The mean tumor size was not significantly different (3.1 versus 2.2cm, P=.9). There was no difference in the average hospital stay (7.1 versus 7.0 days, P=.7). Complications in the spleen-preserving group included one iatrogenic colon injury, two pancreatic fistulas, and two cases of iatrogenic diabetes. In the splenectomy group, two developed respiratory failure, three acquired iatrogenic diabetes, and two suffered pancreatic fistulas (71 versus 41, P=.4). Conclusions. The laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe operation with a low morbidity. Splenic conservation does not significantly increase the morbidity of the procedure.",
author = "Peter Nau and Melvin, {W. Scott} and Narula, {Vimal K.} and Bloomston, {P. Mark} and Ellison, {E. Christopher} and Peter Muscarella",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1155/2009/846340",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Gastroenterology Research and Practice",
issn = "1687-6121",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic conservation

T2 - An operation without increased morbidity

AU - Nau, Peter

AU - Melvin, W. Scott

AU - Narula, Vimal K.

AU - Bloomston, P. Mark

AU - Ellison, E. Christopher

AU - Muscarella, Peter

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Objectives. The advent of minimally invasive techniques was marked by a paradigm shift towards the use of laparoscopy for benign distal pancreatic masses. Herein we describe one center's experience with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed for all distal pancreatectomies completed laparoscopically from 1999 to 2009. Outcomes from those cases completed with a concurrent splenectomy were compared to the spleen-preserving procedures. Results. Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Seven had spleen-conserving operations. There was no difference in the mean estimated blood loss (316 versus 285mL, P=.5) or operative time (179 versus 170minutes, P=.9). The mean tumor size was not significantly different (3.1 versus 2.2cm, P=.9). There was no difference in the average hospital stay (7.1 versus 7.0 days, P=.7). Complications in the spleen-preserving group included one iatrogenic colon injury, two pancreatic fistulas, and two cases of iatrogenic diabetes. In the splenectomy group, two developed respiratory failure, three acquired iatrogenic diabetes, and two suffered pancreatic fistulas (71 versus 41, P=.4). Conclusions. The laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe operation with a low morbidity. Splenic conservation does not significantly increase the morbidity of the procedure.

AB - Objectives. The advent of minimally invasive techniques was marked by a paradigm shift towards the use of laparoscopy for benign distal pancreatic masses. Herein we describe one center's experience with laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed for all distal pancreatectomies completed laparoscopically from 1999 to 2009. Outcomes from those cases completed with a concurrent splenectomy were compared to the spleen-preserving procedures. Results. Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Seven had spleen-conserving operations. There was no difference in the mean estimated blood loss (316 versus 285mL, P=.5) or operative time (179 versus 170minutes, P=.9). The mean tumor size was not significantly different (3.1 versus 2.2cm, P=.9). There was no difference in the average hospital stay (7.1 versus 7.0 days, P=.7). Complications in the spleen-preserving group included one iatrogenic colon injury, two pancreatic fistulas, and two cases of iatrogenic diabetes. In the splenectomy group, two developed respiratory failure, three acquired iatrogenic diabetes, and two suffered pancreatic fistulas (71 versus 41, P=.4). Conclusions. The laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a safe operation with a low morbidity. Splenic conservation does not significantly increase the morbidity of the procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73549108124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73549108124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2009/846340

DO - 10.1155/2009/846340

M3 - Article

JO - Gastroenterology Research and Practice

JF - Gastroenterology Research and Practice

SN - 1687-6121

M1 - 846340

ER -