Is dedicated chest CT needed in addition to PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric oncology patients?

Sarah Z. Goodman, Jeremy Rosenblum, Ibrahim Tuna, Jeffrey M. Levsky, Rosanna Ricafort, Benjamin Taragin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the computed tomography (CT) portion of a positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, at lower dose without breath holding, as compared to diagnostic chest CT (dCTC), performed at regular dose with breath holding, and question the necessity of both for patient care in pediatric oncology. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 46 pediatric patients with histologically proven malignant tumors that had a total of 119 scans. Results: A total of 29 discrepancies were found between dCTC and PET/CT reports. Conclusion: In the evaluation of metastatic thoracic disease in pediatric oncology patients, the non-breath holding CT portion of PET/CT has sensitivity and specificity that approaches dCTC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)794-798
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Keywords

  • Imaging
  • Oncology
  • PET/CT
  • Pediatric
  • Utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is dedicated chest CT needed in addition to PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric oncology patients?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this