Is dedicated chest CT needed in addition to PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric oncology patients?

Sarah Z. Goodman, Jeremy Rosenblum, Ibrahim Tuna, Jeffrey M. Levsky, Rosanna Ricafort, Benjamin Taragin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the computed tomography (CT) portion of a positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, at lower dose without breath holding, as compared to diagnostic chest CT (dCTC), performed at regular dose with breath holding, and question the necessity of both for patient care in pediatric oncology. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 46 pediatric patients with histologically proven malignant tumors that had a total of 119 scans. Results: A total of 29 discrepancies were found between dCTC and PET/CT reports. Conclusion: In the evaluation of metastatic thoracic disease in pediatric oncology patients, the non-breath holding CT portion of PET/CT has sensitivity and specificity that approaches dCTC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)794-798
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume39
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breath Holding
Thorax
Tomography
Pediatrics
Thoracic Diseases
Patient Care
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Imaging
  • Oncology
  • Pediatric
  • PET/CT
  • Utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Is dedicated chest CT needed in addition to PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric oncology patients? / Goodman, Sarah Z.; Rosenblum, Jeremy; Tuna, Ibrahim; Levsky, Jeffrey M.; Ricafort, Rosanna; Taragin, Benjamin.

In: Clinical Imaging, Vol. 39, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. 794-798.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodman, Sarah Z. ; Rosenblum, Jeremy ; Tuna, Ibrahim ; Levsky, Jeffrey M. ; Ricafort, Rosanna ; Taragin, Benjamin. / Is dedicated chest CT needed in addition to PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric oncology patients?. In: Clinical Imaging. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 5. pp. 794-798.
@article{d25b2216cc5b47b2a90502f193498890,
title = "Is dedicated chest CT needed in addition to PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric oncology patients?",
abstract = "Purpose: To assess the computed tomography (CT) portion of a positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, at lower dose without breath holding, as compared to diagnostic chest CT (dCTC), performed at regular dose with breath holding, and question the necessity of both for patient care in pediatric oncology. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 46 pediatric patients with histologically proven malignant tumors that had a total of 119 scans. Results: A total of 29 discrepancies were found between dCTC and PET/CT reports. Conclusion: In the evaluation of metastatic thoracic disease in pediatric oncology patients, the non-breath holding CT portion of PET/CT has sensitivity and specificity that approaches dCTC.",
keywords = "Imaging, Oncology, Pediatric, PET/CT, Utilization",
author = "Goodman, {Sarah Z.} and Jeremy Rosenblum and Ibrahim Tuna and Levsky, {Jeffrey M.} and Rosanna Ricafort and Benjamin Taragin",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.05.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "794--798",
journal = "Clinical Imaging",
issn = "0899-7071",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is dedicated chest CT needed in addition to PET/CT for evaluation of pediatric oncology patients?

AU - Goodman, Sarah Z.

AU - Rosenblum, Jeremy

AU - Tuna, Ibrahim

AU - Levsky, Jeffrey M.

AU - Ricafort, Rosanna

AU - Taragin, Benjamin

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Purpose: To assess the computed tomography (CT) portion of a positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, at lower dose without breath holding, as compared to diagnostic chest CT (dCTC), performed at regular dose with breath holding, and question the necessity of both for patient care in pediatric oncology. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 46 pediatric patients with histologically proven malignant tumors that had a total of 119 scans. Results: A total of 29 discrepancies were found between dCTC and PET/CT reports. Conclusion: In the evaluation of metastatic thoracic disease in pediatric oncology patients, the non-breath holding CT portion of PET/CT has sensitivity and specificity that approaches dCTC.

AB - Purpose: To assess the computed tomography (CT) portion of a positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, at lower dose without breath holding, as compared to diagnostic chest CT (dCTC), performed at regular dose with breath holding, and question the necessity of both for patient care in pediatric oncology. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 46 pediatric patients with histologically proven malignant tumors that had a total of 119 scans. Results: A total of 29 discrepancies were found between dCTC and PET/CT reports. Conclusion: In the evaluation of metastatic thoracic disease in pediatric oncology patients, the non-breath holding CT portion of PET/CT has sensitivity and specificity that approaches dCTC.

KW - Imaging

KW - Oncology

KW - Pediatric

KW - PET/CT

KW - Utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940449855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940449855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 794

EP - 798

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

SN - 0899-7071

IS - 5

ER -