TY - JOUR
T1 - Informed consent for maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening in an inner city population
T2 - how informed is it?
AU - Freda, M. C.
AU - DeVore, N.
AU - Valentine-Adams, N.
AU - Bombard, A.
AU - Merkatz, I. R.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine if women who received information from a provider and viewed a videotape about maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) screening understood enough to sign informed consent. DESIGN: A prospective qualitative design using tape recorded interviews of women who were provided information regarding MSAFP testing from a provider and from viewing a videotape. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-three inner city pregnant women (58% Hispanic, 39% African-American, 3% white). RESULTS: Two women answered all questions correctly; no one answered all questions incorrectly. Sixty-two percent correctly answered "What is MSAFP?" Sixteen percent thought "something has to be taken from my belly" for the test. Fifty-nine percent understood that children with spina bifida could have difficulty walking or urinary problems. Seventy-two percent thought their infant would be healthy in all respects if the test was negative. Only 45% could describe the follow-up to a positive test. Eighty percent planned to have the test. Many misconceptions were apparent, and for some knowledge items, as many as 80% of the women answered incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining truly informed consent for a complex test is not a simple process. Participants met a few, but not all, of the criteria for informed consent. Women understood that the test was voluntary, but their comprehension of the meaning and implication of a positive test results was deficient. Despite this, they signed the informed consent document. The larger question of just how much comprehension is required to consider a woman "informed" has not been answered.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine if women who received information from a provider and viewed a videotape about maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP) screening understood enough to sign informed consent. DESIGN: A prospective qualitative design using tape recorded interviews of women who were provided information regarding MSAFP testing from a provider and from viewing a videotape. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-three inner city pregnant women (58% Hispanic, 39% African-American, 3% white). RESULTS: Two women answered all questions correctly; no one answered all questions incorrectly. Sixty-two percent correctly answered "What is MSAFP?" Sixteen percent thought "something has to be taken from my belly" for the test. Fifty-nine percent understood that children with spina bifida could have difficulty walking or urinary problems. Seventy-two percent thought their infant would be healthy in all respects if the test was negative. Only 45% could describe the follow-up to a positive test. Eighty percent planned to have the test. Many misconceptions were apparent, and for some knowledge items, as many as 80% of the women answered incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining truly informed consent for a complex test is not a simple process. Participants met a few, but not all, of the criteria for informed consent. Women understood that the test was voluntary, but their comprehension of the meaning and implication of a positive test results was deficient. Despite this, they signed the informed consent document. The larger question of just how much comprehension is required to consider a woman "informed" has not been answered.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031602583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031602583&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02597.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02597.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 9475134
AN - SCOPUS:0031602583
SN - 0884-2175
VL - 27
SP - 99
EP - 106
JO - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
JF - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
IS - 1
ER -