Incidence, predictors and outcomes of valve-in-valve TAVI: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Francesca Giordana, Francesco Bruno, Federico Conrotto, Andrea Saglietto, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo, Walter Grosso Marra, Danny Dvir, John Webb, Augusto D'Onofrio, Daniele Camboni, Herko Grubitzsch, Alison Duncan, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Stefan Toggweiler, Azeem Latib, Roberto Nerla, Stefano Salizzoni, Michele La Torre, Anna Trompeo, Maurizio D'AmicoMauro Rinaldi, Gaetano De Ferrari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aims: Surgical aortic valve replacement has been the treatment of choice for patients with aortic valve disease before the arrival of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI), although limited by degeneration of the bioprosthesis. “Redo” intervention itself is burdened by high risk of complications and valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVI could be a valid strategy of redo for patients with comorbidities. Methods and results: Two independent reviewers screened all studies investigating patients undergoing ViV TAVI. Mortality at 30 days and at 1 year was the primary end point. Of 286 studies identified, 26 articles were included in this review with a total of 1448 patients. Median age was 78.8 years, 57.7% male. Median STS score and Logistic EuroSCORE were 9.4% and 31.3% respectively. Stenosis (45%) was the leading cause of prosthesis failure. Transfemoral approach was preferred (76%), with a prevalence of balloon expandable valves (73.3%). Mean follow up was 376 days. Overall and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days was 6.5% and 5.5% respectively, while at 1 year it was 14.5% and 8.9% respectively. At meta-regression analysis study year (p <.001), Logistic EuroSCORE (p <.01) and valve diameter ≤ 21 mm (p <.05) at 30 days, and stenosis as reason for failure (p =.05) at 1 year were identified as possible predictors of survival. Conclusions: ViV TAVI offers a valid strategy to treat high risk patients with a failure of bioprosthesis with satisfying results in terms of short and mid-term mortality. Future studies are needed to find predictors of long term survival and outcomes in lower risk patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)64-69
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume316
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Aortic stenosis
  • Heart team
  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  • Valve-in-valve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incidence, predictors and outcomes of valve-in-valve TAVI: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this