Improving the quality of primary care by optimizing implementation research reporting

The StaRI Group

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The potential of implementation research in understanding strategies for changing practice is undermined by poor reporting, leaving readers unable to replicate such strategies and unclear whether they apply in the context of their practice. These challenges are particularly pertinent in the complex, diverse world of primary care. The recently published Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) provides a framework for comprehensive reporting of implementation research. A key concept is the consideration and reporting in “dual strands”: on the one hand, the implementation strategy and on the other, the evidence-based intervention. Other requirements are full descriptions of context, strategies and interventions (and how the strategies were adopted or adapted), and evaluation methods, which will require flexible interpretation of journal limit constraints or innovative approaches to supplementary information. The choice is between accepting the unsatisfactory status quo or adopting strategies to improve reporting with a view to optimizing the potential of implementation research to advance primary care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)484-487
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Primary Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Implementation Science, Primary Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Improving the quality of primary care by optimizing implementation research reporting. / The StaRI Group.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 484-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{857acf14c04749ae8f9773dd9f499e16,
title = "Improving the quality of primary care by optimizing implementation research reporting",
abstract = "The potential of implementation research in understanding strategies for changing practice is undermined by poor reporting, leaving readers unable to replicate such strategies and unclear whether they apply in the context of their practice. These challenges are particularly pertinent in the complex, diverse world of primary care. The recently published Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) provides a framework for comprehensive reporting of implementation research. A key concept is the consideration and reporting in “dual strands”: on the one hand, the implementation strategy and on the other, the evidence-based intervention. Other requirements are full descriptions of context, strategies and interventions (and how the strategies were adopted or adapted), and evaluation methods, which will require flexible interpretation of journal limit constraints or innovative approaches to supplementary information. The choice is between accepting the unsatisfactory status quo or adopting strategies to improve reporting with a view to optimizing the potential of implementation research to advance primary care.",
keywords = "Implementation Science, Primary Health Care",
author = "{The StaRI Group} and Gonzalo Grandes and Hilary Pinnock and Andrew Bazemore and Paul Meissner",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170195",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "484--487",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the quality of primary care by optimizing implementation research reporting

AU - The StaRI Group

AU - Grandes, Gonzalo

AU - Pinnock, Hilary

AU - Bazemore, Andrew

AU - Meissner, Paul

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - The potential of implementation research in understanding strategies for changing practice is undermined by poor reporting, leaving readers unable to replicate such strategies and unclear whether they apply in the context of their practice. These challenges are particularly pertinent in the complex, diverse world of primary care. The recently published Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) provides a framework for comprehensive reporting of implementation research. A key concept is the consideration and reporting in “dual strands”: on the one hand, the implementation strategy and on the other, the evidence-based intervention. Other requirements are full descriptions of context, strategies and interventions (and how the strategies were adopted or adapted), and evaluation methods, which will require flexible interpretation of journal limit constraints or innovative approaches to supplementary information. The choice is between accepting the unsatisfactory status quo or adopting strategies to improve reporting with a view to optimizing the potential of implementation research to advance primary care.

AB - The potential of implementation research in understanding strategies for changing practice is undermined by poor reporting, leaving readers unable to replicate such strategies and unclear whether they apply in the context of their practice. These challenges are particularly pertinent in the complex, diverse world of primary care. The recently published Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) provides a framework for comprehensive reporting of implementation research. A key concept is the consideration and reporting in “dual strands”: on the one hand, the implementation strategy and on the other, the evidence-based intervention. Other requirements are full descriptions of context, strategies and interventions (and how the strategies were adopted or adapted), and evaluation methods, which will require flexible interpretation of journal limit constraints or innovative approaches to supplementary information. The choice is between accepting the unsatisfactory status quo or adopting strategies to improve reporting with a view to optimizing the potential of implementation research to advance primary care.

KW - Implementation Science, Primary Health Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047368295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047368295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170195

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170195

M3 - Article

C2 - 29743231

AN - SCOPUS:85047368295

VL - 31

SP - 484

EP - 487

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 3

ER -