Improving Medical Student Feedback With a Clinical Encounter Card

Philip O. Ozuah, Marina Reznik, Larrie Greenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We previously developed a Clinical Encounter Card (CEC) for use in medical student feedback. However, no prior studies have investigated the effectiveness of the CEC. The objective of our study was to determine whether use of the CEC would increase medical students' perception of the feedback they received. Methods: We conducted a time-series repeated-measures experimental study at a pediatric clerkship site. The study included a crossover design with experimental and control arms. Third-year medical students on the ambulatory rotations were the experimental arm, and inpatient students were the control arm. Students and faculty in the experimental arm received the CEC, which listed 7 feedback domains: history and interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, management plan, and professionalism. We used a 10-point Likert-type scale to record responses of students weekly regarding their perceptions of having received feedback in the 7 domains. Multivariate analysis of variance for repeat measures tested mean differences in continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U rank order sum tested ordinal rank differences. Results: We received 504 reports from students regarding the feedback they received. We found statistically significant improvements in 6 feedback domains for experimental subjects: history/interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, and management plan. There was no improvement in feedback received about professionalism. Conclusions: Use of the CEC resulted in students' perceiving increased feedback as evidenced by significant improvements in several medical student feedback domains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)449-452
Number of pages4
JournalAmbulatory Pediatrics
Volume7
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Medical Students
Students
Physical Examination
History
Cross-Over Studies
Inpatients
Analysis of Variance
Multivariate Analysis
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Clinical Encounter Card
  • feedback
  • medical students
  • perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Improving Medical Student Feedback With a Clinical Encounter Card. / Ozuah, Philip O.; Reznik, Marina; Greenberg, Larrie.

In: Ambulatory Pediatrics, Vol. 7, No. 6, 11.2007, p. 449-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de19078a09a346f7b5de4e9759d2a69a,
title = "Improving Medical Student Feedback With a Clinical Encounter Card",
abstract = "Objective: We previously developed a Clinical Encounter Card (CEC) for use in medical student feedback. However, no prior studies have investigated the effectiveness of the CEC. The objective of our study was to determine whether use of the CEC would increase medical students' perception of the feedback they received. Methods: We conducted a time-series repeated-measures experimental study at a pediatric clerkship site. The study included a crossover design with experimental and control arms. Third-year medical students on the ambulatory rotations were the experimental arm, and inpatient students were the control arm. Students and faculty in the experimental arm received the CEC, which listed 7 feedback domains: history and interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, management plan, and professionalism. We used a 10-point Likert-type scale to record responses of students weekly regarding their perceptions of having received feedback in the 7 domains. Multivariate analysis of variance for repeat measures tested mean differences in continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U rank order sum tested ordinal rank differences. Results: We received 504 reports from students regarding the feedback they received. We found statistically significant improvements in 6 feedback domains for experimental subjects: history/interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, and management plan. There was no improvement in feedback received about professionalism. Conclusions: Use of the CEC resulted in students' perceiving increased feedback as evidenced by significant improvements in several medical student feedback domains.",
keywords = "Clinical Encounter Card, feedback, medical students, perception",
author = "Ozuah, {Philip O.} and Marina Reznik and Larrie Greenberg",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ambp.2007.07.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "449--452",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving Medical Student Feedback With a Clinical Encounter Card

AU - Ozuah, Philip O.

AU - Reznik, Marina

AU - Greenberg, Larrie

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Objective: We previously developed a Clinical Encounter Card (CEC) for use in medical student feedback. However, no prior studies have investigated the effectiveness of the CEC. The objective of our study was to determine whether use of the CEC would increase medical students' perception of the feedback they received. Methods: We conducted a time-series repeated-measures experimental study at a pediatric clerkship site. The study included a crossover design with experimental and control arms. Third-year medical students on the ambulatory rotations were the experimental arm, and inpatient students were the control arm. Students and faculty in the experimental arm received the CEC, which listed 7 feedback domains: history and interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, management plan, and professionalism. We used a 10-point Likert-type scale to record responses of students weekly regarding their perceptions of having received feedback in the 7 domains. Multivariate analysis of variance for repeat measures tested mean differences in continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U rank order sum tested ordinal rank differences. Results: We received 504 reports from students regarding the feedback they received. We found statistically significant improvements in 6 feedback domains for experimental subjects: history/interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, and management plan. There was no improvement in feedback received about professionalism. Conclusions: Use of the CEC resulted in students' perceiving increased feedback as evidenced by significant improvements in several medical student feedback domains.

AB - Objective: We previously developed a Clinical Encounter Card (CEC) for use in medical student feedback. However, no prior studies have investigated the effectiveness of the CEC. The objective of our study was to determine whether use of the CEC would increase medical students' perception of the feedback they received. Methods: We conducted a time-series repeated-measures experimental study at a pediatric clerkship site. The study included a crossover design with experimental and control arms. Third-year medical students on the ambulatory rotations were the experimental arm, and inpatient students were the control arm. Students and faculty in the experimental arm received the CEC, which listed 7 feedback domains: history and interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, management plan, and professionalism. We used a 10-point Likert-type scale to record responses of students weekly regarding their perceptions of having received feedback in the 7 domains. Multivariate analysis of variance for repeat measures tested mean differences in continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney U rank order sum tested ordinal rank differences. Results: We received 504 reports from students regarding the feedback they received. We found statistically significant improvements in 6 feedback domains for experimental subjects: history/interviewing, physical examination, oral presentation, written notes, patient assessment, and management plan. There was no improvement in feedback received about professionalism. Conclusions: Use of the CEC resulted in students' perceiving increased feedback as evidenced by significant improvements in several medical student feedback domains.

KW - Clinical Encounter Card

KW - feedback

KW - medical students

KW - perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35848948881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35848948881&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.07.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 17996839

AN - SCOPUS:35848948881

VL - 7

SP - 449

EP - 452

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 6

ER -