Hypopharyngeal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea: Practice patterns, perceptions, and attitudes

Eric J. Kezirian, Heather M. Hussey, Scott E. Brietzke, Seth M. Cohen, Greg E. Davis, Jennifer J. Shin, Debra G. Weinberger, Michael D. Cabana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To characterize factors that surgeons perceive as affecting selection of procedures designed to treat hypopharyngeal obstruction in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to compare those factors among 2 groups of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) member surgeons. Study Design. Cross-sectional online survey. Subjects and Methods. AAO-HNS members with a selfidentified subspecialty interest either in sleep medicine or general otolaryngology were asked to complete an online survey, each respondent rated (5-point Likert scale) the perceived quality of their education and training and the role of specific factors in selection, both for procedure categories (eg, all hypopharyngeal) and individual procedures. Responses were examined for the entire group and for subgroups. Results. Response rate was 27% (163/610). Sixty-five percent of respondents rated their surgical OSA education and training during postgraduate continuing medical education (CME) courses as of high quality, compared with 39% for residency/fellowship and 4% for medical school (P< 0.01). For individual hypopharyngeal procedures, over 40% of respondents reported limited training (except for tongue radiofrequency), and over 30% raised concerns about scientific evidence and reimbursement. Surgeon personal experience suggested treatment benefits without clearly favoring individual procedures. Respondents noted that patients were reluctant to undergo procedures, despite treatment recommendations, particularly maxillomandibular advancement. The sleep medicine subgroup reported higher ratings for education and training quality, research evidence, and personal experience with hypopharyngeal procedures. Concerns about adequate education and training, the quality of research evidence, and reimbursement issues were major factors in procedure selection. Conclusion. Multiple factors affect procedure selection. Surgeons identify concerns regarding education and training and research evidence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)964-971
Number of pages8
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume147
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Otolaryngology
Education
Sleep
Neck
Head
Research
Medicine
Continuing Medical Education
Internship and Residency
Medical Schools
Tongue
Cross-Sectional Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Health services research
  • Sleep medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Hypopharyngeal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea : Practice patterns, perceptions, and attitudes. / Kezirian, Eric J.; Hussey, Heather M.; Brietzke, Scott E.; Cohen, Seth M.; Davis, Greg E.; Shin, Jennifer J.; Weinberger, Debra G.; Cabana, Michael D.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), Vol. 147, No. 5, 01.11.2012, p. 964-971.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kezirian, Eric J. ; Hussey, Heather M. ; Brietzke, Scott E. ; Cohen, Seth M. ; Davis, Greg E. ; Shin, Jennifer J. ; Weinberger, Debra G. ; Cabana, Michael D. / Hypopharyngeal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea : Practice patterns, perceptions, and attitudes. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States). 2012 ; Vol. 147, No. 5. pp. 964-971.
@article{d1a07b026d08418ab912a748e5368835,
title = "Hypopharyngeal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea: Practice patterns, perceptions, and attitudes",
abstract = "Objective. To characterize factors that surgeons perceive as affecting selection of procedures designed to treat hypopharyngeal obstruction in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to compare those factors among 2 groups of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) member surgeons. Study Design. Cross-sectional online survey. Subjects and Methods. AAO-HNS members with a selfidentified subspecialty interest either in sleep medicine or general otolaryngology were asked to complete an online survey, each respondent rated (5-point Likert scale) the perceived quality of their education and training and the role of specific factors in selection, both for procedure categories (eg, all hypopharyngeal) and individual procedures. Responses were examined for the entire group and for subgroups. Results. Response rate was 27{\%} (163/610). Sixty-five percent of respondents rated their surgical OSA education and training during postgraduate continuing medical education (CME) courses as of high quality, compared with 39{\%} for residency/fellowship and 4{\%} for medical school (P< 0.01). For individual hypopharyngeal procedures, over 40{\%} of respondents reported limited training (except for tongue radiofrequency), and over 30{\%} raised concerns about scientific evidence and reimbursement. Surgeon personal experience suggested treatment benefits without clearly favoring individual procedures. Respondents noted that patients were reluctant to undergo procedures, despite treatment recommendations, particularly maxillomandibular advancement. The sleep medicine subgroup reported higher ratings for education and training quality, research evidence, and personal experience with hypopharyngeal procedures. Concerns about adequate education and training, the quality of research evidence, and reimbursement issues were major factors in procedure selection. Conclusion. Multiple factors affect procedure selection. Surgeons identify concerns regarding education and training and research evidence.",
keywords = "Evidence-based medicine, Health services research, Sleep medicine",
author = "Kezirian, {Eric J.} and Hussey, {Heather M.} and Brietzke, {Scott E.} and Cohen, {Seth M.} and Davis, {Greg E.} and Shin, {Jennifer J.} and Weinberger, {Debra G.} and Cabana, {Michael D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0194599812453000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "964--971",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hypopharyngeal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea

T2 - Practice patterns, perceptions, and attitudes

AU - Kezirian, Eric J.

AU - Hussey, Heather M.

AU - Brietzke, Scott E.

AU - Cohen, Seth M.

AU - Davis, Greg E.

AU - Shin, Jennifer J.

AU - Weinberger, Debra G.

AU - Cabana, Michael D.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Objective. To characterize factors that surgeons perceive as affecting selection of procedures designed to treat hypopharyngeal obstruction in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to compare those factors among 2 groups of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) member surgeons. Study Design. Cross-sectional online survey. Subjects and Methods. AAO-HNS members with a selfidentified subspecialty interest either in sleep medicine or general otolaryngology were asked to complete an online survey, each respondent rated (5-point Likert scale) the perceived quality of their education and training and the role of specific factors in selection, both for procedure categories (eg, all hypopharyngeal) and individual procedures. Responses were examined for the entire group and for subgroups. Results. Response rate was 27% (163/610). Sixty-five percent of respondents rated their surgical OSA education and training during postgraduate continuing medical education (CME) courses as of high quality, compared with 39% for residency/fellowship and 4% for medical school (P< 0.01). For individual hypopharyngeal procedures, over 40% of respondents reported limited training (except for tongue radiofrequency), and over 30% raised concerns about scientific evidence and reimbursement. Surgeon personal experience suggested treatment benefits without clearly favoring individual procedures. Respondents noted that patients were reluctant to undergo procedures, despite treatment recommendations, particularly maxillomandibular advancement. The sleep medicine subgroup reported higher ratings for education and training quality, research evidence, and personal experience with hypopharyngeal procedures. Concerns about adequate education and training, the quality of research evidence, and reimbursement issues were major factors in procedure selection. Conclusion. Multiple factors affect procedure selection. Surgeons identify concerns regarding education and training and research evidence.

AB - Objective. To characterize factors that surgeons perceive as affecting selection of procedures designed to treat hypopharyngeal obstruction in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and to compare those factors among 2 groups of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) member surgeons. Study Design. Cross-sectional online survey. Subjects and Methods. AAO-HNS members with a selfidentified subspecialty interest either in sleep medicine or general otolaryngology were asked to complete an online survey, each respondent rated (5-point Likert scale) the perceived quality of their education and training and the role of specific factors in selection, both for procedure categories (eg, all hypopharyngeal) and individual procedures. Responses were examined for the entire group and for subgroups. Results. Response rate was 27% (163/610). Sixty-five percent of respondents rated their surgical OSA education and training during postgraduate continuing medical education (CME) courses as of high quality, compared with 39% for residency/fellowship and 4% for medical school (P< 0.01). For individual hypopharyngeal procedures, over 40% of respondents reported limited training (except for tongue radiofrequency), and over 30% raised concerns about scientific evidence and reimbursement. Surgeon personal experience suggested treatment benefits without clearly favoring individual procedures. Respondents noted that patients were reluctant to undergo procedures, despite treatment recommendations, particularly maxillomandibular advancement. The sleep medicine subgroup reported higher ratings for education and training quality, research evidence, and personal experience with hypopharyngeal procedures. Concerns about adequate education and training, the quality of research evidence, and reimbursement issues were major factors in procedure selection. Conclusion. Multiple factors affect procedure selection. Surgeons identify concerns regarding education and training and research evidence.

KW - Evidence-based medicine

KW - Health services research

KW - Sleep medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872030724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872030724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0194599812453000

DO - 10.1177/0194599812453000

M3 - Article

C2 - 22753614

AN - SCOPUS:84872030724

VL - 147

SP - 964

EP - 971

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 5

ER -