Hoarseness evaluation

A transatlantic survey of laryngeal experts

Babak Sadoughi, Marvin P. Fried, Lucian Sulica, Andrew Blitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis Hoarseness is a symptom of laryngeal dysfunction, without an existing consensus regarding its appropriate evaluation. A survey of laryngeal specialists is proposed to establish expert opinion on the methodology for evaluation of hoarseness, and to identify divergence of opinion regarding appropriate management. Study Design Cross-sectional survey. Methods A 13-item questionnaire was submitted electronically to the membership of the American Laryngological Association, the American Broncho-Esophagological Association, and the European Laryngological Society. Responses were collated anonymously and subjected to cross-tabulated data analysis. Results A total of 195 responses were included for review. The majority of respondents identified themselves as laryngologists/phoniatricians (54.9%). Two-thirds (64.1%) of the providers dedicated more than 25% of their practice to voice management, and 48.8% managed more than 10 dysphonic patients weekly. Most respondents defined hoarseness and dysphonia as symptoms and not diseases. The panel recommended a mandated time to laryngoscopy of 1 week to 1 month from the onset of symptoms for most acutely dysphonic patients, regardless of risk factors for malignancy, while it was not advised to defer laryngoscopy beyond 2 months of symptom persistence in any situation. A majority (96.2%) felt that an otolaryngologist ought to perform the initial laryngoscopy of a newly hoarse patient. Conclusion This survey demonstrates an agreement to expedite specialized laryngeal visualization for cases of hoarseness not subsiding within 1 month, and exemplifies controversies stemming from a recently published clinical practice guideline. Ongoing research and practice evaluation will contribute to set forth improved standards of care and to appropriately counsel dysphonic patients. Level of Evidence 5. Laryngoscope, 124:221-226, 2014

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)221-226
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume124
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Hoarseness
Laryngoscopy
Laryngoscopes
Dysphonia
Expert Testimony
Standard of Care
Practice Guidelines
Cross-Sectional Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • dysphonia
  • guideline
  • Hoarseness
  • laryngoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Hoarseness evaluation : A transatlantic survey of laryngeal experts. / Sadoughi, Babak; Fried, Marvin P.; Sulica, Lucian; Blitzer, Andrew.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 124, No. 1, 2014, p. 221-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sadoughi, Babak ; Fried, Marvin P. ; Sulica, Lucian ; Blitzer, Andrew. / Hoarseness evaluation : A transatlantic survey of laryngeal experts. In: Laryngoscope. 2014 ; Vol. 124, No. 1. pp. 221-226.
@article{ad0b194e31884cfb8f4671938e837eec,
title = "Hoarseness evaluation: A transatlantic survey of laryngeal experts",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis Hoarseness is a symptom of laryngeal dysfunction, without an existing consensus regarding its appropriate evaluation. A survey of laryngeal specialists is proposed to establish expert opinion on the methodology for evaluation of hoarseness, and to identify divergence of opinion regarding appropriate management. Study Design Cross-sectional survey. Methods A 13-item questionnaire was submitted electronically to the membership of the American Laryngological Association, the American Broncho-Esophagological Association, and the European Laryngological Society. Responses were collated anonymously and subjected to cross-tabulated data analysis. Results A total of 195 responses were included for review. The majority of respondents identified themselves as laryngologists/phoniatricians (54.9{\%}). Two-thirds (64.1{\%}) of the providers dedicated more than 25{\%} of their practice to voice management, and 48.8{\%} managed more than 10 dysphonic patients weekly. Most respondents defined hoarseness and dysphonia as symptoms and not diseases. The panel recommended a mandated time to laryngoscopy of 1 week to 1 month from the onset of symptoms for most acutely dysphonic patients, regardless of risk factors for malignancy, while it was not advised to defer laryngoscopy beyond 2 months of symptom persistence in any situation. A majority (96.2{\%}) felt that an otolaryngologist ought to perform the initial laryngoscopy of a newly hoarse patient. Conclusion This survey demonstrates an agreement to expedite specialized laryngeal visualization for cases of hoarseness not subsiding within 1 month, and exemplifies controversies stemming from a recently published clinical practice guideline. Ongoing research and practice evaluation will contribute to set forth improved standards of care and to appropriately counsel dysphonic patients. Level of Evidence 5. Laryngoscope, 124:221-226, 2014",
keywords = "dysphonia, guideline, Hoarseness, laryngoscopy",
author = "Babak Sadoughi and Fried, {Marvin P.} and Lucian Sulica and Andrew Blitzer",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/lary.24178",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "124",
pages = "221--226",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hoarseness evaluation

T2 - A transatlantic survey of laryngeal experts

AU - Sadoughi, Babak

AU - Fried, Marvin P.

AU - Sulica, Lucian

AU - Blitzer, Andrew

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis Hoarseness is a symptom of laryngeal dysfunction, without an existing consensus regarding its appropriate evaluation. A survey of laryngeal specialists is proposed to establish expert opinion on the methodology for evaluation of hoarseness, and to identify divergence of opinion regarding appropriate management. Study Design Cross-sectional survey. Methods A 13-item questionnaire was submitted electronically to the membership of the American Laryngological Association, the American Broncho-Esophagological Association, and the European Laryngological Society. Responses were collated anonymously and subjected to cross-tabulated data analysis. Results A total of 195 responses were included for review. The majority of respondents identified themselves as laryngologists/phoniatricians (54.9%). Two-thirds (64.1%) of the providers dedicated more than 25% of their practice to voice management, and 48.8% managed more than 10 dysphonic patients weekly. Most respondents defined hoarseness and dysphonia as symptoms and not diseases. The panel recommended a mandated time to laryngoscopy of 1 week to 1 month from the onset of symptoms for most acutely dysphonic patients, regardless of risk factors for malignancy, while it was not advised to defer laryngoscopy beyond 2 months of symptom persistence in any situation. A majority (96.2%) felt that an otolaryngologist ought to perform the initial laryngoscopy of a newly hoarse patient. Conclusion This survey demonstrates an agreement to expedite specialized laryngeal visualization for cases of hoarseness not subsiding within 1 month, and exemplifies controversies stemming from a recently published clinical practice guideline. Ongoing research and practice evaluation will contribute to set forth improved standards of care and to appropriately counsel dysphonic patients. Level of Evidence 5. Laryngoscope, 124:221-226, 2014

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis Hoarseness is a symptom of laryngeal dysfunction, without an existing consensus regarding its appropriate evaluation. A survey of laryngeal specialists is proposed to establish expert opinion on the methodology for evaluation of hoarseness, and to identify divergence of opinion regarding appropriate management. Study Design Cross-sectional survey. Methods A 13-item questionnaire was submitted electronically to the membership of the American Laryngological Association, the American Broncho-Esophagological Association, and the European Laryngological Society. Responses were collated anonymously and subjected to cross-tabulated data analysis. Results A total of 195 responses were included for review. The majority of respondents identified themselves as laryngologists/phoniatricians (54.9%). Two-thirds (64.1%) of the providers dedicated more than 25% of their practice to voice management, and 48.8% managed more than 10 dysphonic patients weekly. Most respondents defined hoarseness and dysphonia as symptoms and not diseases. The panel recommended a mandated time to laryngoscopy of 1 week to 1 month from the onset of symptoms for most acutely dysphonic patients, regardless of risk factors for malignancy, while it was not advised to defer laryngoscopy beyond 2 months of symptom persistence in any situation. A majority (96.2%) felt that an otolaryngologist ought to perform the initial laryngoscopy of a newly hoarse patient. Conclusion This survey demonstrates an agreement to expedite specialized laryngeal visualization for cases of hoarseness not subsiding within 1 month, and exemplifies controversies stemming from a recently published clinical practice guideline. Ongoing research and practice evaluation will contribute to set forth improved standards of care and to appropriately counsel dysphonic patients. Level of Evidence 5. Laryngoscope, 124:221-226, 2014

KW - dysphonia

KW - guideline

KW - Hoarseness

KW - laryngoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895847813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895847813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.24178

DO - 10.1002/lary.24178

M3 - Article

VL - 124

SP - 221

EP - 226

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 1

ER -