Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6

Discography for patient selection

Jason C. Eck, Alok Sharan, Daniel K. Resnick, William C. Watters, Zoher Ghogawala, Andrew T. Dailey, Pravee N V Mummaneni, Michael W. Groff, Jeffrey C. Wang, Tanvir F. Choudhri, Sanjay S. Dhall, Michael G. Kaiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Identifying the etiology of pain for patients suffering from chronic low-back pain remains problematic. Noninvasive imaging modalities, used in isolation, have not consistently provided sufficient evidence to support performance of a lumbar fusion. Provocative testing has been used as an adjunct in this assessment, either alone or in combination with other modalities, to enhance the diagnostic capabilities when evaluating patients with low-back pain. There have been a limited number of studies investigating this topic since the publication of the original guidelines. Based primarily on retrospective studies, discography, as a stand-alone test, is not recommended to formulate treatment strategies for patients with low-back pain. A single randomized cohort study demonstrated an improved potential of discoblock over discography as a predictor of success following lumbar fusion. It is therefore recommended that discoblock be considered as a diagnostic option. There is a possibility, based on a matched cohort study, that an association exists between progression of degenerative disc disease and the performance of a provocative discogram. It is therefore recommended that patients be counseled regarding this potential development prior to undergoing discography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-41
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Patient Selection
Spine
Low Back Pain
Guidelines
Cohort Studies
Publications
Retrospective Studies
Pain
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Discoblock
  • Discography
  • Fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6 : Discography for patient selection. / Eck, Jason C.; Sharan, Alok; Resnick, Daniel K.; Watters, William C.; Ghogawala, Zoher; Dailey, Andrew T.; Mummaneni, Pravee N V; Groff, Michael W.; Wang, Jeffrey C.; Choudhri, Tanvir F.; Dhall, Sanjay S.; Kaiser, Michael G.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 37-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eck, JC, Sharan, A, Resnick, DK, Watters, WC, Ghogawala, Z, Dailey, AT, Mummaneni, PNV, Groff, MW, Wang, JC, Choudhri, TF, Dhall, SS & Kaiser, MG 2014, 'Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: Discography for patient selection', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37-41. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14269
Eck, Jason C. ; Sharan, Alok ; Resnick, Daniel K. ; Watters, William C. ; Ghogawala, Zoher ; Dailey, Andrew T. ; Mummaneni, Pravee N V ; Groff, Michael W. ; Wang, Jeffrey C. ; Choudhri, Tanvir F. ; Dhall, Sanjay S. ; Kaiser, Michael G. / Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6 : Discography for patient selection. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 37-41.
@article{c1c6b44a9ce24c61be0c738d2f0565b9,
title = "Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6: Discography for patient selection",
abstract = "Identifying the etiology of pain for patients suffering from chronic low-back pain remains problematic. Noninvasive imaging modalities, used in isolation, have not consistently provided sufficient evidence to support performance of a lumbar fusion. Provocative testing has been used as an adjunct in this assessment, either alone or in combination with other modalities, to enhance the diagnostic capabilities when evaluating patients with low-back pain. There have been a limited number of studies investigating this topic since the publication of the original guidelines. Based primarily on retrospective studies, discography, as a stand-alone test, is not recommended to formulate treatment strategies for patients with low-back pain. A single randomized cohort study demonstrated an improved potential of discoblock over discography as a predictor of success following lumbar fusion. It is therefore recommended that discoblock be considered as a diagnostic option. There is a possibility, based on a matched cohort study, that an association exists between progression of degenerative disc disease and the performance of a provocative discogram. It is therefore recommended that patients be counseled regarding this potential development prior to undergoing discography.",
keywords = "Discoblock, Discography, Fusion, Lumbar spine, Practice guidelines",
author = "Eck, {Jason C.} and Alok Sharan and Resnick, {Daniel K.} and Watters, {William C.} and Zoher Ghogawala and Dailey, {Andrew T.} and Mummaneni, {Pravee N V} and Groff, {Michael W.} and Wang, {Jeffrey C.} and Choudhri, {Tanvir F.} and Dhall, {Sanjay S.} and Kaiser, {Michael G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14269",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "37--41",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 6

T2 - Discography for patient selection

AU - Eck, Jason C.

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Resnick, Daniel K.

AU - Watters, William C.

AU - Ghogawala, Zoher

AU - Dailey, Andrew T.

AU - Mummaneni, Pravee N V

AU - Groff, Michael W.

AU - Wang, Jeffrey C.

AU - Choudhri, Tanvir F.

AU - Dhall, Sanjay S.

AU - Kaiser, Michael G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Identifying the etiology of pain for patients suffering from chronic low-back pain remains problematic. Noninvasive imaging modalities, used in isolation, have not consistently provided sufficient evidence to support performance of a lumbar fusion. Provocative testing has been used as an adjunct in this assessment, either alone or in combination with other modalities, to enhance the diagnostic capabilities when evaluating patients with low-back pain. There have been a limited number of studies investigating this topic since the publication of the original guidelines. Based primarily on retrospective studies, discography, as a stand-alone test, is not recommended to formulate treatment strategies for patients with low-back pain. A single randomized cohort study demonstrated an improved potential of discoblock over discography as a predictor of success following lumbar fusion. It is therefore recommended that discoblock be considered as a diagnostic option. There is a possibility, based on a matched cohort study, that an association exists between progression of degenerative disc disease and the performance of a provocative discogram. It is therefore recommended that patients be counseled regarding this potential development prior to undergoing discography.

AB - Identifying the etiology of pain for patients suffering from chronic low-back pain remains problematic. Noninvasive imaging modalities, used in isolation, have not consistently provided sufficient evidence to support performance of a lumbar fusion. Provocative testing has been used as an adjunct in this assessment, either alone or in combination with other modalities, to enhance the diagnostic capabilities when evaluating patients with low-back pain. There have been a limited number of studies investigating this topic since the publication of the original guidelines. Based primarily on retrospective studies, discography, as a stand-alone test, is not recommended to formulate treatment strategies for patients with low-back pain. A single randomized cohort study demonstrated an improved potential of discoblock over discography as a predictor of success following lumbar fusion. It is therefore recommended that discoblock be considered as a diagnostic option. There is a possibility, based on a matched cohort study, that an association exists between progression of degenerative disc disease and the performance of a provocative discogram. It is therefore recommended that patients be counseled regarding this potential development prior to undergoing discography.

KW - Discoblock

KW - Discography

KW - Fusion

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903896542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903896542&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14269

DO - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14269

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 37

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 1

ER -