Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2

Assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion

Zoher Ghogawala, Daniel K. Resnick, William C. Watters, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Andrew T. Dailey, Tanvir F. Choudhri, Jason C. Eck, Alok Sharan, Michael W. Groff, Jeffrey C. Wang, Sanjay S. Dhall, Michael G. Kaiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assessment of functional patient-reported outcome following lumbar spinal fusion continues to be essential for comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for patients presenting with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. When assessing functional outcome in patients being treated with lumbar spinal fusion, a reliable, valid, and responsive outcomes instrument such as the Oswestry Disability Index should be used. The SF-36 and the SF-12 have emerged as dominant measures of general health-related quality of life. Research has established the minimum clinically important difference for major functional outcomes measures, and this should be considered when assessing clinical outcome. The results of recent studies suggest that a patient's pretreatment psychological state is a major independent variable that affects the ability to detect change in functional outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-13
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Neurosurgery: Spine
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Spinal Fusion
Spine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines
Quality of Life
Psychology
Research
Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Keywords

  • Fusion
  • Lumbar spine
  • Practice guidelines
  • Treatment outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery
  • Neurology

Cite this

Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2 : Assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion. / Ghogawala, Zoher; Resnick, Daniel K.; Watters, William C.; Mummaneni, Praveen V.; Dailey, Andrew T.; Choudhri, Tanvir F.; Eck, Jason C.; Sharan, Alok; Groff, Michael W.; Wang, Jeffrey C.; Dhall, Sanjay S.; Kaiser, Michael G.

In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 7-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ghogawala, Z, Resnick, DK, Watters, WC, Mummaneni, PV, Dailey, AT, Choudhri, TF, Eck, JC, Sharan, A, Groff, MW, Wang, JC, Dhall, SS & Kaiser, MG 2014, 'Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2: Assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 7-13. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14258
Ghogawala, Zoher ; Resnick, Daniel K. ; Watters, William C. ; Mummaneni, Praveen V. ; Dailey, Andrew T. ; Choudhri, Tanvir F. ; Eck, Jason C. ; Sharan, Alok ; Groff, Michael W. ; Wang, Jeffrey C. ; Dhall, Sanjay S. ; Kaiser, Michael G. / Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2 : Assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion. In: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 7-13.
@article{6c1e7240bbb44e9fb5c97b5e672f9280,
title = "Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2: Assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion",
abstract = "Assessment of functional patient-reported outcome following lumbar spinal fusion continues to be essential for comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for patients presenting with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. When assessing functional outcome in patients being treated with lumbar spinal fusion, a reliable, valid, and responsive outcomes instrument such as the Oswestry Disability Index should be used. The SF-36 and the SF-12 have emerged as dominant measures of general health-related quality of life. Research has established the minimum clinically important difference for major functional outcomes measures, and this should be considered when assessing clinical outcome. The results of recent studies suggest that a patient's pretreatment psychological state is a major independent variable that affects the ability to detect change in functional outcome.",
keywords = "Fusion, Lumbar spine, Practice guidelines, Treatment outcomes",
author = "Zoher Ghogawala and Resnick, {Daniel K.} and Watters, {William C.} and Mummaneni, {Praveen V.} and Dailey, {Andrew T.} and Choudhri, {Tanvir F.} and Eck, {Jason C.} and Alok Sharan and Groff, {Michael W.} and Wang, {Jeffrey C.} and Dhall, {Sanjay S.} and Kaiser, {Michael G.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14258",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "7--13",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine",
issn = "1547-5654",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 2

T2 - Assessment of functional outcome following lumbar fusion

AU - Ghogawala, Zoher

AU - Resnick, Daniel K.

AU - Watters, William C.

AU - Mummaneni, Praveen V.

AU - Dailey, Andrew T.

AU - Choudhri, Tanvir F.

AU - Eck, Jason C.

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Groff, Michael W.

AU - Wang, Jeffrey C.

AU - Dhall, Sanjay S.

AU - Kaiser, Michael G.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Assessment of functional patient-reported outcome following lumbar spinal fusion continues to be essential for comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for patients presenting with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. When assessing functional outcome in patients being treated with lumbar spinal fusion, a reliable, valid, and responsive outcomes instrument such as the Oswestry Disability Index should be used. The SF-36 and the SF-12 have emerged as dominant measures of general health-related quality of life. Research has established the minimum clinically important difference for major functional outcomes measures, and this should be considered when assessing clinical outcome. The results of recent studies suggest that a patient's pretreatment psychological state is a major independent variable that affects the ability to detect change in functional outcome.

AB - Assessment of functional patient-reported outcome following lumbar spinal fusion continues to be essential for comparing the effectiveness of different treatments for patients presenting with degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. When assessing functional outcome in patients being treated with lumbar spinal fusion, a reliable, valid, and responsive outcomes instrument such as the Oswestry Disability Index should be used. The SF-36 and the SF-12 have emerged as dominant measures of general health-related quality of life. Research has established the minimum clinically important difference for major functional outcomes measures, and this should be considered when assessing clinical outcome. The results of recent studies suggest that a patient's pretreatment psychological state is a major independent variable that affects the ability to detect change in functional outcome.

KW - Fusion

KW - Lumbar spine

KW - Practice guidelines

KW - Treatment outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903885427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903885427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14258

DO - 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14258

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 7

EP - 13

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine

SN - 1547-5654

IS - 1

ER -