Gender differences in the balance of healthy elderly as demonstrated by dynamic posturography

L. Wolfson, R. Whipple, Carol A. Derby, P. Amerman, L. Nashner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

111 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Prior studies indicate that older women fall more often than men although there is no evidence of gender-based balance differences. Using a force platform, we measured the effects of restricted sensory input and support surface movement to detect gender differences in balance. Methods. Healthy, elderly community dwellers (N = 234, mean age = 76 ± 5 years, 52% female) were administered the following perturbations on the balance platform. The platform and/or visual surround were fixed or tilted proportionally to the subject's sway with the eyes open or closed, forward or backward horizontal translations, and toes-up and toes-down rotations. Results. Gender-based balance differences were not present during quiet standing, or when the support surface or visual input were manipulated separately. Women swayed and lost their balance more than men when the surface was sway-referenced while vision was compromised, but by the third trial their sway control was comparable to the men. Women also initially lost their balance more frequently than men during toes-up and -down rotations, and compared to men continued to lose their balance more often during repeated toes-up rotations. Finally, women developed less angular momentum than men in response to forward platform rotations. Discussion. Elderly women show impairments of balance when simultaneously deprived of visual and somatosensory inputs or during a backwards destabilization. Since there is little evidence for a CNS source for such gender differences, biomechanical origins (e.g., dorsiflexion strength and range of motion) are a more likely cause. Limited postural control of women under conditions stressing balance may explain their greater frequency of falling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournals of Gerontology
Volume49
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Toes
Accidental Falls
Articular Range of Motion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aging

Cite this

Gender differences in the balance of healthy elderly as demonstrated by dynamic posturography. / Wolfson, L.; Whipple, R.; Derby, Carol A.; Amerman, P.; Nashner, L.

In: Journals of Gerontology, Vol. 49, No. 4, 1994.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da092650cb5a494b8d0c94ff1aad507c,
title = "Gender differences in the balance of healthy elderly as demonstrated by dynamic posturography",
abstract = "Background. Prior studies indicate that older women fall more often than men although there is no evidence of gender-based balance differences. Using a force platform, we measured the effects of restricted sensory input and support surface movement to detect gender differences in balance. Methods. Healthy, elderly community dwellers (N = 234, mean age = 76 ± 5 years, 52{\%} female) were administered the following perturbations on the balance platform. The platform and/or visual surround were fixed or tilted proportionally to the subject's sway with the eyes open or closed, forward or backward horizontal translations, and toes-up and toes-down rotations. Results. Gender-based balance differences were not present during quiet standing, or when the support surface or visual input were manipulated separately. Women swayed and lost their balance more than men when the surface was sway-referenced while vision was compromised, but by the third trial their sway control was comparable to the men. Women also initially lost their balance more frequently than men during toes-up and -down rotations, and compared to men continued to lose their balance more often during repeated toes-up rotations. Finally, women developed less angular momentum than men in response to forward platform rotations. Discussion. Elderly women show impairments of balance when simultaneously deprived of visual and somatosensory inputs or during a backwards destabilization. Since there is little evidence for a CNS source for such gender differences, biomechanical origins (e.g., dorsiflexion strength and range of motion) are a more likely cause. Limited postural control of women under conditions stressing balance may explain their greater frequency of falling.",
author = "L. Wolfson and R. Whipple and Derby, {Carol A.} and P. Amerman and L. Nashner",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
journal = "Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences",
issn = "0022-1422",
publisher = "Gerontological Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in the balance of healthy elderly as demonstrated by dynamic posturography

AU - Wolfson, L.

AU - Whipple, R.

AU - Derby, Carol A.

AU - Amerman, P.

AU - Nashner, L.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Background. Prior studies indicate that older women fall more often than men although there is no evidence of gender-based balance differences. Using a force platform, we measured the effects of restricted sensory input and support surface movement to detect gender differences in balance. Methods. Healthy, elderly community dwellers (N = 234, mean age = 76 ± 5 years, 52% female) were administered the following perturbations on the balance platform. The platform and/or visual surround were fixed or tilted proportionally to the subject's sway with the eyes open or closed, forward or backward horizontal translations, and toes-up and toes-down rotations. Results. Gender-based balance differences were not present during quiet standing, or when the support surface or visual input were manipulated separately. Women swayed and lost their balance more than men when the surface was sway-referenced while vision was compromised, but by the third trial their sway control was comparable to the men. Women also initially lost their balance more frequently than men during toes-up and -down rotations, and compared to men continued to lose their balance more often during repeated toes-up rotations. Finally, women developed less angular momentum than men in response to forward platform rotations. Discussion. Elderly women show impairments of balance when simultaneously deprived of visual and somatosensory inputs or during a backwards destabilization. Since there is little evidence for a CNS source for such gender differences, biomechanical origins (e.g., dorsiflexion strength and range of motion) are a more likely cause. Limited postural control of women under conditions stressing balance may explain their greater frequency of falling.

AB - Background. Prior studies indicate that older women fall more often than men although there is no evidence of gender-based balance differences. Using a force platform, we measured the effects of restricted sensory input and support surface movement to detect gender differences in balance. Methods. Healthy, elderly community dwellers (N = 234, mean age = 76 ± 5 years, 52% female) were administered the following perturbations on the balance platform. The platform and/or visual surround were fixed or tilted proportionally to the subject's sway with the eyes open or closed, forward or backward horizontal translations, and toes-up and toes-down rotations. Results. Gender-based balance differences were not present during quiet standing, or when the support surface or visual input were manipulated separately. Women swayed and lost their balance more than men when the surface was sway-referenced while vision was compromised, but by the third trial their sway control was comparable to the men. Women also initially lost their balance more frequently than men during toes-up and -down rotations, and compared to men continued to lose their balance more often during repeated toes-up rotations. Finally, women developed less angular momentum than men in response to forward platform rotations. Discussion. Elderly women show impairments of balance when simultaneously deprived of visual and somatosensory inputs or during a backwards destabilization. Since there is little evidence for a CNS source for such gender differences, biomechanical origins (e.g., dorsiflexion strength and range of motion) are a more likely cause. Limited postural control of women under conditions stressing balance may explain their greater frequency of falling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028359035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028359035&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 49

JO - Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences

JF - Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences

SN - 0022-1422

IS - 4

ER -