Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures

Berton R. Moed, Paul H. Yu, Konrad I. Gruson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment is a validated, well-designed, self-administered questionnaire that is useful for determining health status. The modified Merle d'Aubigné clinical hip score is the most generally accepted clinical grading system for evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and modified Merle d'Aubigné scores in evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients with an acetabular fracture met the criteria for inclusion in the present study, which included a minimum of two years of postoperative follow-up, a complete physical examination with use of the Merle d'Aubigné score, and successful completion of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire. Patients were stratified according to a number of factors, including the type of fracture and whether the fracture was an isolated injury or was part of a multiple-injury complex. The mean duration of follow-up was five years (range, two to seventeen years). Results: The mean modified Merle d'Aubigné score was 16.8 (range, 9 to 18), and the mean Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was 24.9 (range, 0 to 79). The Spearman correlation coefficient between the Merle d'Aubigné score and the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was -0.61 (p < 0.0001). Stratification of the patients did not alter these overall results. However, the presence or absence of associated injuries was a significant factor for the Merle d'Aubigné score (p = 0.03). In addition, the Merle d'Aubigné score data were asymmetric, demonstrating a ceiling effect. Conclusions: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for these patients were relatively high compared with those for the normal population, indicating that complete return to a preinjury functional level is uncommon despite a good-to-excellent Merle d'Aubigné clinical score. Furthermore, the ceiling effect demonstrated by the Merle d'Aubigné score (despite its high correlation with the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score) limits its usefulness as a method for evaluating the outcome of treatment of acetabular fractures. There have been few published clinical studies in which the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score has been used as an outcome measure, and reference values are lacking. The present study provides initial guideline reference values for use in the evaluation of patients following an acetabular fracture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1879-1883
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A
Volume85
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reference Values
Multiple Trauma
Wounds and Injuries
Health Status
Physical Examination
Hip
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines
Therapeutics
Population
Surveys and Questionnaires
Clinical Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures. / Moed, Berton R.; Yu, Paul H.; Gruson, Konrad I.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A, Vol. 85, No. 10, 01.10.2003, p. 1879-1883.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moed, Berton R. ; Yu, Paul H. ; Gruson, Konrad I. / Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series A. 2003 ; Vol. 85, No. 10. pp. 1879-1883.
@article{32b9607290b84c369c92db52c70108ff,
title = "Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures",
abstract = "Background: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment is a validated, well-designed, self-administered questionnaire that is useful for determining health status. The modified Merle d'Aubign{\'e} clinical hip score is the most generally accepted clinical grading system for evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and modified Merle d'Aubign{\'e} scores in evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients with an acetabular fracture met the criteria for inclusion in the present study, which included a minimum of two years of postoperative follow-up, a complete physical examination with use of the Merle d'Aubign{\'e} score, and successful completion of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire. Patients were stratified according to a number of factors, including the type of fracture and whether the fracture was an isolated injury or was part of a multiple-injury complex. The mean duration of follow-up was five years (range, two to seventeen years). Results: The mean modified Merle d'Aubign{\'e} score was 16.8 (range, 9 to 18), and the mean Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was 24.9 (range, 0 to 79). The Spearman correlation coefficient between the Merle d'Aubign{\'e} score and the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was -0.61 (p < 0.0001). Stratification of the patients did not alter these overall results. However, the presence or absence of associated injuries was a significant factor for the Merle d'Aubign{\'e} score (p = 0.03). In addition, the Merle d'Aubign{\'e} score data were asymmetric, demonstrating a ceiling effect. Conclusions: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for these patients were relatively high compared with those for the normal population, indicating that complete return to a preinjury functional level is uncommon despite a good-to-excellent Merle d'Aubign{\'e} clinical score. Furthermore, the ceiling effect demonstrated by the Merle d'Aubign{\'e} score (despite its high correlation with the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score) limits its usefulness as a method for evaluating the outcome of treatment of acetabular fractures. There have been few published clinical studies in which the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score has been used as an outcome measure, and reference values are lacking. The present study provides initial guideline reference values for use in the evaluation of patients following an acetabular fracture.",
author = "Moed, {Berton R.} and Yu, {Paul H.} and Gruson, {Konrad I.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "1879--1883",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional outcomes of acetabular fractures

AU - Moed, Berton R.

AU - Yu, Paul H.

AU - Gruson, Konrad I.

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - Background: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment is a validated, well-designed, self-administered questionnaire that is useful for determining health status. The modified Merle d'Aubigné clinical hip score is the most generally accepted clinical grading system for evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and modified Merle d'Aubigné scores in evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients with an acetabular fracture met the criteria for inclusion in the present study, which included a minimum of two years of postoperative follow-up, a complete physical examination with use of the Merle d'Aubigné score, and successful completion of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire. Patients were stratified according to a number of factors, including the type of fracture and whether the fracture was an isolated injury or was part of a multiple-injury complex. The mean duration of follow-up was five years (range, two to seventeen years). Results: The mean modified Merle d'Aubigné score was 16.8 (range, 9 to 18), and the mean Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was 24.9 (range, 0 to 79). The Spearman correlation coefficient between the Merle d'Aubigné score and the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was -0.61 (p < 0.0001). Stratification of the patients did not alter these overall results. However, the presence or absence of associated injuries was a significant factor for the Merle d'Aubigné score (p = 0.03). In addition, the Merle d'Aubigné score data were asymmetric, demonstrating a ceiling effect. Conclusions: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for these patients were relatively high compared with those for the normal population, indicating that complete return to a preinjury functional level is uncommon despite a good-to-excellent Merle d'Aubigné clinical score. Furthermore, the ceiling effect demonstrated by the Merle d'Aubigné score (despite its high correlation with the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score) limits its usefulness as a method for evaluating the outcome of treatment of acetabular fractures. There have been few published clinical studies in which the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score has been used as an outcome measure, and reference values are lacking. The present study provides initial guideline reference values for use in the evaluation of patients following an acetabular fracture.

AB - Background: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment is a validated, well-designed, self-administered questionnaire that is useful for determining health status. The modified Merle d'Aubigné clinical hip score is the most generally accepted clinical grading system for evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment and modified Merle d'Aubigné scores in evaluating the results of acetabular fracture treatment. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients with an acetabular fracture met the criteria for inclusion in the present study, which included a minimum of two years of postoperative follow-up, a complete physical examination with use of the Merle d'Aubigné score, and successful completion of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire. Patients were stratified according to a number of factors, including the type of fracture and whether the fracture was an isolated injury or was part of a multiple-injury complex. The mean duration of follow-up was five years (range, two to seventeen years). Results: The mean modified Merle d'Aubigné score was 16.8 (range, 9 to 18), and the mean Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was 24.9 (range, 0 to 79). The Spearman correlation coefficient between the Merle d'Aubigné score and the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score was -0.61 (p < 0.0001). Stratification of the patients did not alter these overall results. However, the presence or absence of associated injuries was a significant factor for the Merle d'Aubigné score (p = 0.03). In addition, the Merle d'Aubigné score data were asymmetric, demonstrating a ceiling effect. Conclusions: The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment scores for these patients were relatively high compared with those for the normal population, indicating that complete return to a preinjury functional level is uncommon despite a good-to-excellent Merle d'Aubigné clinical score. Furthermore, the ceiling effect demonstrated by the Merle d'Aubigné score (despite its high correlation with the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score) limits its usefulness as a method for evaluating the outcome of treatment of acetabular fractures. There have been few published clinical studies in which the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment score has been used as an outcome measure, and reference values are lacking. The present study provides initial guideline reference values for use in the evaluation of patients following an acetabular fracture.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141889801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141889801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14563792

AN - SCOPUS:0141889801

VL - 85

SP - 1879

EP - 1883

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 10

ER -