Expression of the chicken and duck δ2-crystallin gene

X. Li, Ales Cvekl, J. Piatigorsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose. To understand the molecular basis for the high expression of the duck δ2-crystallin gene and the low expression of the chicken δ2 gene in the lens. Methods. Various δ2 promoter fragments were fused to the bacterial CAT reporter gene which was linked to 732 bp of intron 3 containing the chicken 62 enhancer (δ2E) in pSVOCAT. Chicken δEF1 element (or the comparable region from the duck 62 gene) was placed within the chicken αA -148/+77 promoter fragment between positions -96 and -56, which contained a polylinker sequence, and was fused to the CAT gene in p8CAT. Transfection tests were conducted in 14-day-old embryonic chicken lens epithelial cells. Transgenic mice were produced at the NEI Transgenic Facility. Results. The chicken 52 promoter construct comprising the whole spacer (-4.5 kbp/+46) gave about 3 times less CAT activity than the -308/+46 promoter construct in transfected embryonic chicken lens cells. The larger promoter fragment produced 2 lines of trangenic mice with lens-specific transgene expression, while the smaller promoter gave multiple lines with transgene expression in the lens and brain (Purkinje cells). Gel mobility tests showed that the -3509/-2930 and -1710/-1478 sequences in the spacer formed complexes with lens nuclear extract; the former gave 5 DNase I protected regions. Finally, in transfection tests the chicken δEF1 suppressed chicken αA promoter activity, while the comparable duck sequence, which has a single bp difference, did not. Conclusions. These data suggest (1) a lens and brain silencing action located in the spacer upstream of the chicken 62 gene and (2) that a mutation in the negative δEF1 element of the duck δ2E allows high expression in the lens.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInvestigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science
Volume37
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 15 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Crystallins
Ducks
Chickens
Lenses
Genes
Transgenes
Transfection
Purkinje Cells
Deoxyribonuclease I
Brain
Reporter Genes
Introns
Transgenic Mice
Gels
Epithelial Cells
Gene Expression
Mutation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Expression of the chicken and duck δ2-crystallin gene. / Li, X.; Cvekl, Ales; Piatigorsky, J.

In: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, 15.02.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c53dee360c32409baf9ff38a3d47fc17,
title = "Expression of the chicken and duck δ2-crystallin gene",
abstract = "Purpose. To understand the molecular basis for the high expression of the duck δ2-crystallin gene and the low expression of the chicken δ2 gene in the lens. Methods. Various δ2 promoter fragments were fused to the bacterial CAT reporter gene which was linked to 732 bp of intron 3 containing the chicken 62 enhancer (δ2E) in pSVOCAT. Chicken δEF1 element (or the comparable region from the duck 62 gene) was placed within the chicken αA -148/+77 promoter fragment between positions -96 and -56, which contained a polylinker sequence, and was fused to the CAT gene in p8CAT. Transfection tests were conducted in 14-day-old embryonic chicken lens epithelial cells. Transgenic mice were produced at the NEI Transgenic Facility. Results. The chicken 52 promoter construct comprising the whole spacer (-4.5 kbp/+46) gave about 3 times less CAT activity than the -308/+46 promoter construct in transfected embryonic chicken lens cells. The larger promoter fragment produced 2 lines of trangenic mice with lens-specific transgene expression, while the smaller promoter gave multiple lines with transgene expression in the lens and brain (Purkinje cells). Gel mobility tests showed that the -3509/-2930 and -1710/-1478 sequences in the spacer formed complexes with lens nuclear extract; the former gave 5 DNase I protected regions. Finally, in transfection tests the chicken δEF1 suppressed chicken αA promoter activity, while the comparable duck sequence, which has a single bp difference, did not. Conclusions. These data suggest (1) a lens and brain silencing action located in the spacer upstream of the chicken 62 gene and (2) that a mutation in the negative δEF1 element of the duck δ2E allows high expression in the lens.",
author = "X. Li and Ales Cvekl and J. Piatigorsky",
year = "1996",
month = "2",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expression of the chicken and duck δ2-crystallin gene

AU - Li, X.

AU - Cvekl, Ales

AU - Piatigorsky, J.

PY - 1996/2/15

Y1 - 1996/2/15

N2 - Purpose. To understand the molecular basis for the high expression of the duck δ2-crystallin gene and the low expression of the chicken δ2 gene in the lens. Methods. Various δ2 promoter fragments were fused to the bacterial CAT reporter gene which was linked to 732 bp of intron 3 containing the chicken 62 enhancer (δ2E) in pSVOCAT. Chicken δEF1 element (or the comparable region from the duck 62 gene) was placed within the chicken αA -148/+77 promoter fragment between positions -96 and -56, which contained a polylinker sequence, and was fused to the CAT gene in p8CAT. Transfection tests were conducted in 14-day-old embryonic chicken lens epithelial cells. Transgenic mice were produced at the NEI Transgenic Facility. Results. The chicken 52 promoter construct comprising the whole spacer (-4.5 kbp/+46) gave about 3 times less CAT activity than the -308/+46 promoter construct in transfected embryonic chicken lens cells. The larger promoter fragment produced 2 lines of trangenic mice with lens-specific transgene expression, while the smaller promoter gave multiple lines with transgene expression in the lens and brain (Purkinje cells). Gel mobility tests showed that the -3509/-2930 and -1710/-1478 sequences in the spacer formed complexes with lens nuclear extract; the former gave 5 DNase I protected regions. Finally, in transfection tests the chicken δEF1 suppressed chicken αA promoter activity, while the comparable duck sequence, which has a single bp difference, did not. Conclusions. These data suggest (1) a lens and brain silencing action located in the spacer upstream of the chicken 62 gene and (2) that a mutation in the negative δEF1 element of the duck δ2E allows high expression in the lens.

AB - Purpose. To understand the molecular basis for the high expression of the duck δ2-crystallin gene and the low expression of the chicken δ2 gene in the lens. Methods. Various δ2 promoter fragments were fused to the bacterial CAT reporter gene which was linked to 732 bp of intron 3 containing the chicken 62 enhancer (δ2E) in pSVOCAT. Chicken δEF1 element (or the comparable region from the duck 62 gene) was placed within the chicken αA -148/+77 promoter fragment between positions -96 and -56, which contained a polylinker sequence, and was fused to the CAT gene in p8CAT. Transfection tests were conducted in 14-day-old embryonic chicken lens epithelial cells. Transgenic mice were produced at the NEI Transgenic Facility. Results. The chicken 52 promoter construct comprising the whole spacer (-4.5 kbp/+46) gave about 3 times less CAT activity than the -308/+46 promoter construct in transfected embryonic chicken lens cells. The larger promoter fragment produced 2 lines of trangenic mice with lens-specific transgene expression, while the smaller promoter gave multiple lines with transgene expression in the lens and brain (Purkinje cells). Gel mobility tests showed that the -3509/-2930 and -1710/-1478 sequences in the spacer formed complexes with lens nuclear extract; the former gave 5 DNase I protected regions. Finally, in transfection tests the chicken δEF1 suppressed chicken αA promoter activity, while the comparable duck sequence, which has a single bp difference, did not. Conclusions. These data suggest (1) a lens and brain silencing action located in the spacer upstream of the chicken 62 gene and (2) that a mutation in the negative δEF1 element of the duck δ2E allows high expression in the lens.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750196945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750196945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

IS - 3

ER -