Examining the Appropriateness and Motivations behind Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Department Visits

Maya Haasz, Daniel Ostro, Dennis Scolnik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives High patient volumes have a deleterious effect on care in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Our study assessed the motivation for PED visits that could have been assessed by a primary care physician. Methods We identified a convenience sample of patients presenting to the SickKids Hospital PED in June and July 2011 with a Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 or 5. Patients completed a forced answer yes/no survey describing potential motivators for visiting the PED. Visit appropriateness was determined by a modified version of the DeAngelis tool, an explicit criteria-based tool frequently used for this purpose. Results Of the included 635 patients with Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 and 5, 25% were truly inappropriate as per DeAngelis criteria. Of these, perceived expertise at the tertiary care hospital (93.1%) and ease of getting tests (80.8%) were the most common reasons behind PED presentation. Conclusions Patients presenting to our PED typically have primary care physicians; however, access to their physicians during off-hours and availability of off-site testing is limited. Public policy aimed at decreasing overcrowding in the PED should address these themes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)647-649
Number of pages3
JournalPediatric Emergency Care
Volume34
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Pediatrics
Triage
Primary Care Physicians
Pediatric Hospitals
Tertiary Healthcare
Public Policy
Tertiary Care Centers
Physicians

Keywords

  • inappropriate presentations
  • overcrowding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Examining the Appropriateness and Motivations behind Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Department Visits. / Haasz, Maya; Ostro, Daniel; Scolnik, Dennis.

In: Pediatric Emergency Care, Vol. 34, No. 9, 01.09.2018, p. 647-649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4bb6bf8412444a8b9beb2f22edbed031,
title = "Examining the Appropriateness and Motivations behind Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Department Visits",
abstract = "Objectives High patient volumes have a deleterious effect on care in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Our study assessed the motivation for PED visits that could have been assessed by a primary care physician. Methods We identified a convenience sample of patients presenting to the SickKids Hospital PED in June and July 2011 with a Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 or 5. Patients completed a forced answer yes/no survey describing potential motivators for visiting the PED. Visit appropriateness was determined by a modified version of the DeAngelis tool, an explicit criteria-based tool frequently used for this purpose. Results Of the included 635 patients with Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 and 5, 25{\%} were truly inappropriate as per DeAngelis criteria. Of these, perceived expertise at the tertiary care hospital (93.1{\%}) and ease of getting tests (80.8{\%}) were the most common reasons behind PED presentation. Conclusions Patients presenting to our PED typically have primary care physicians; however, access to their physicians during off-hours and availability of off-site testing is limited. Public policy aimed at decreasing overcrowding in the PED should address these themes.",
keywords = "inappropriate presentations, overcrowding",
author = "Maya Haasz and Daniel Ostro and Dennis Scolnik",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PEC.0000000000001598",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "647--649",
journal = "Pediatric Emergency Care",
issn = "0749-5161",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Appropriateness and Motivations behind Low-Acuity Pediatric Emergency Department Visits

AU - Haasz, Maya

AU - Ostro, Daniel

AU - Scolnik, Dennis

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Objectives High patient volumes have a deleterious effect on care in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Our study assessed the motivation for PED visits that could have been assessed by a primary care physician. Methods We identified a convenience sample of patients presenting to the SickKids Hospital PED in June and July 2011 with a Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 or 5. Patients completed a forced answer yes/no survey describing potential motivators for visiting the PED. Visit appropriateness was determined by a modified version of the DeAngelis tool, an explicit criteria-based tool frequently used for this purpose. Results Of the included 635 patients with Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 and 5, 25% were truly inappropriate as per DeAngelis criteria. Of these, perceived expertise at the tertiary care hospital (93.1%) and ease of getting tests (80.8%) were the most common reasons behind PED presentation. Conclusions Patients presenting to our PED typically have primary care physicians; however, access to their physicians during off-hours and availability of off-site testing is limited. Public policy aimed at decreasing overcrowding in the PED should address these themes.

AB - Objectives High patient volumes have a deleterious effect on care in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Our study assessed the motivation for PED visits that could have been assessed by a primary care physician. Methods We identified a convenience sample of patients presenting to the SickKids Hospital PED in June and July 2011 with a Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 or 5. Patients completed a forced answer yes/no survey describing potential motivators for visiting the PED. Visit appropriateness was determined by a modified version of the DeAngelis tool, an explicit criteria-based tool frequently used for this purpose. Results Of the included 635 patients with Paediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Score 4 and 5, 25% were truly inappropriate as per DeAngelis criteria. Of these, perceived expertise at the tertiary care hospital (93.1%) and ease of getting tests (80.8%) were the most common reasons behind PED presentation. Conclusions Patients presenting to our PED typically have primary care physicians; however, access to their physicians during off-hours and availability of off-site testing is limited. Public policy aimed at decreasing overcrowding in the PED should address these themes.

KW - inappropriate presentations

KW - overcrowding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053353754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053353754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001598

DO - 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001598

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 647

EP - 649

JO - Pediatric Emergency Care

JF - Pediatric Emergency Care

SN - 0749-5161

IS - 9

ER -