Ethical challenges in implementation research

Ruth Macklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Implementation research is increasingly common in developing countries as a way of studying the introduction to the population of health interventions that have been proven to be effective elsewhere. Implementation studies are often conducted as cluster randomized trials, a design that raises ethical and conceptual questions different from those in conventional randomized controlled trials. It is often unclear who the subjects of the research are, informed consent may be difficult or impossible to obtain and controversy surrounds the use of comparison clusters that provide substandard care to the population where the research is carried out. An examination of protocols for this type of research reveals uncertainty on the part of researchers themselves about whom or what they are studying and from whom (if anyone) informed consent is required.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)86-93
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health Ethics
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Informed Consent
Research
Population
Developing Countries
Uncertainty
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Ethical challenges in implementation research. / Macklin, Ruth.

In: Public Health Ethics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2014, p. 86-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Macklin, Ruth. / Ethical challenges in implementation research. In: Public Health Ethics. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 86-93.
@article{7ca3652d31344719a49d293bcf31d1b1,
title = "Ethical challenges in implementation research",
abstract = "Implementation research is increasingly common in developing countries as a way of studying the introduction to the population of health interventions that have been proven to be effective elsewhere. Implementation studies are often conducted as cluster randomized trials, a design that raises ethical and conceptual questions different from those in conventional randomized controlled trials. It is often unclear who the subjects of the research are, informed consent may be difficult or impossible to obtain and controversy surrounds the use of comparison clusters that provide substandard care to the population where the research is carried out. An examination of protocols for this type of research reveals uncertainty on the part of researchers themselves about whom or what they are studying and from whom (if anyone) informed consent is required.",
author = "Ruth Macklin",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1093/phe/phu003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "86--93",
journal = "Public Health Ethics",
issn = "1754-9973",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical challenges in implementation research

AU - Macklin, Ruth

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Implementation research is increasingly common in developing countries as a way of studying the introduction to the population of health interventions that have been proven to be effective elsewhere. Implementation studies are often conducted as cluster randomized trials, a design that raises ethical and conceptual questions different from those in conventional randomized controlled trials. It is often unclear who the subjects of the research are, informed consent may be difficult or impossible to obtain and controversy surrounds the use of comparison clusters that provide substandard care to the population where the research is carried out. An examination of protocols for this type of research reveals uncertainty on the part of researchers themselves about whom or what they are studying and from whom (if anyone) informed consent is required.

AB - Implementation research is increasingly common in developing countries as a way of studying the introduction to the population of health interventions that have been proven to be effective elsewhere. Implementation studies are often conducted as cluster randomized trials, a design that raises ethical and conceptual questions different from those in conventional randomized controlled trials. It is often unclear who the subjects of the research are, informed consent may be difficult or impossible to obtain and controversy surrounds the use of comparison clusters that provide substandard care to the population where the research is carried out. An examination of protocols for this type of research reveals uncertainty on the part of researchers themselves about whom or what they are studying and from whom (if anyone) informed consent is required.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896955742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896955742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/phe/phu003

DO - 10.1093/phe/phu003

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 86

EP - 93

JO - Public Health Ethics

JF - Public Health Ethics

SN - 1754-9973

IS - 1

ER -